Re: [PATCH 3/4] gnu: Add python-paramunittest

> An issue has been started, and hopefully, we'll receive the answer soon. >From this thread https://github.com/rik0/ParamUnittest/issues/8 the author has finally chosen BSD-2. -- Frederick M. Muriithi

Re: [PATCH 5/5] gnu: Add python-sphinx-rtd-theme-0.1.9

On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 12:56:34PM +0300, Muriithi Frederick Muriuki wrote: > * gnu/packages/python.scm (python-sphinx-rtd-theme-0.1.9): New variable. Rather than creating another package, I'll try updating python-sphinx-rtd-theme to this newer version before I push. Hopefully the dependent packag

Re: [PATCH 1/5] gnu: Add python-mando-0.3.1

On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 12:56:30PM +0300, Muriithi Frederick Muriuki wrote: > * gnu/packages/python.scm (python-mando-0.3.1): New variable. Overall this patch series LGTM. Minor comments to follow... > +(define-public python-mando-0.3.1 Let's add a comment explaining why we have this older vers

Re: [PATCH 2/4] gnu: Add python-sphinx-1.5.2, python-sphinx-1.5.3

Pjotr Prins writes: > Are the messages showing up on debbugs? No. These were sent to “guix-devel”, not “guix-patches”. -- Ricardo GPG: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6 2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC https://elephly.net

Re: [PATCH 4/4] gnu: Add python-mando

On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 12:23:35PM +0300, Muriithi Frederick Muriuki wrote: > * gnu/packages/python.scm (python-mando): New variable. Thanks, looks good! I'll push this series (or a revision of it) after we get a timely response to the paramunittest licensing question. If there is not a timely r

Re: [PATCH 2/4] gnu: Add python-sphinx-1.5.2, python-sphinx-1.5.3

On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 11:11:00AM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote: > On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 06:32:49PM +0300, Frederick Muriithi wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 6:10 PM, Pjotr Prins > > wrote: > > > Hi Fred, > > > > > > Why do we need both versions? > > > > > > > We don't. I noticed there was a n

Re: [PATCH 2/4] gnu: Add python-sphinx-1.5.2, python-sphinx-1.5.3

On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 06:32:49PM +0300, Frederick Muriithi wrote: > On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 6:10 PM, Pjotr Prins > wrote: > > Hi Fred, > > > > Why do we need both versions? > > > > We don't. I noticed there was a newer version (1.5.3) while working on > version 1.5.2, and thought to just add i

Re: [PATCH 1/4] gnu: Add python-pytest-3.0.7

On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 06:29:04PM +0300, Frederick Muriithi wrote: > I don't really see a reason why not. I have to point out though, that when > writing the definition, I found python-pytest-2.9.2 also defined, with a > note that it's there until all packages can be upgraded to use a more > recen

A "busy beaver" approach to assisting package definition updates

Hello! David Thompson and I had the good fortune to be able to hang out with the esteemed Gerald Sussman in his office over tea. Topics were wide ranging, but one in particular has stuck in my mind as to how it could apply to Guix. What Sussman said is he thought version skew was a source of man

[Nicolas Cannasse] Re: Question about LICENSE file and overal license for neko project

This is a message for those wishing to package the neko project and components such as nekoc and nekoml. As I'm not a developer, this case is somewhat confusing to me, specially in regards to whether neko (virtual machine?) should have its license changed or not. I still didn't reply to them, but

Re: Shouldn't docbook-xml/xsl set XML_CATALOG_FILES?

Am 26.03.2017 um 22:13 schrieb Ludovic Courtès: > Now, what’s problematic, is that often users don’t install libxml2 > itself but rather tools that happen to be linked against libxml2. This > is where the problem is: . Hmm, well, in my case this occurred in a build-env

Re: Should synopsis handle texinfo markup?

Ludovic Courtès (2017-03-24 10:38 +0100) wrote: > Hi Alex, > > Sorry for the delay. No problem! My delays are longer :-) > Alex Kost skribis: > >> From 8d8a79d69619b68dd3a798e7456bfd871fcb8395 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >> From: Alex Kost >> Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2017 13:41:41 +0300 >> Subject: [PA