ng0 writes:
> Ludovic Courtès writes:
>
>> n...@we.make.ritual.n0.is skribis:
>>
>>> Ludovic Courtès writes:
>>
>> [...]
>>
I suppose TB contains a script that does all that, right? Would it work
to simply run it? If it invokes wget/curl, then this needs to be
replaced, but the
On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 08:59:32PM -0400, Mark H Weaver wrote:
> Leo Famulari writes:
> > If I push A-B-C with a signed HEAD immediately after somebody pushes a
> > forged D, won't it look like I vouch for D?
>
> This can't happen unless D is already in your local repo before you
> commit locally
David Craven writes:
> * gnu/packages/qemu.scm (qemu)[inputs]: Add SPICE and VIRGLRENDERER.
> [arguments]: Pass --enable-spice.
Unfortunately, 'spice' only builds successfully on x86_64, so with this
patch, i686 and armhf lose 'qemu'.
One problem is that 'spice' depends on 'usbredir', and 'usb
Ricardo Wurmus writes:
> Alex Vong writes:
>
>> I notice 'octave 4.0.2' has 'openssl@1.0.2h' as one of its inputs. As
>> far as I know, gplv3 is incompatible with openssl license
>> (https://people.gnome.org/~markmc/openssl-and-the-gpl.html).
>
> Looks like you’re right. Other projects add a sp
Leo Famulari writes:
> On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 06:50:30PM +0200, Andy Wingo wrote:
>> Why would you sign a commit if you don't attest to intermediate unsigned
>> commits?
>
> If I push A-B-C with a signed HEAD immediately after somebody pushes a
> forged D, won't it look like I vouch for D?
This
On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 05:57:43PM -0400, Mark H Weaver wrote:
> Andreas Enge writes:
>
> > On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 11:06:36AM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote:
> >> Also, I can do the guile-2.0 update that Ludovic requested.
> >
> > The patch fails to apply:
> >http://hydra.gnu.org:3000/build/14055
Andreas Enge writes:
> On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 11:06:36AM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote:
>> Also, I can do the guile-2.0 update that Ludovic requested.
>
> The patch fails to apply:
>http://hydra.gnu.org:3000/build/1405519/nixlog/1/tail-reload
> Hopefully it is not needed any more?
guile-arm-fix
On 16-08-03 04:03pm, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> We are pleased to announce the release of GNU Guix & GuixSD 0.11.0,
> representing 2,119 commits by 70 people over 4 months.
Thumbs up for the effort.
Would love to see some cross-fertilization between the projects.
--
Proudly written in Mutt with V
On 2016-07-26 04:19, Pjotr Prins wrote:
FOSDEM 2017 call for proposals has started:
https://fosdem.org/2017/news/2016-07-20-call-for-participation/
We need help with writing the proposal (we can build on last years
this time), we need help on selecting talks and we need help creating
the sche
On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 11:06:36AM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote:
> Also, I can do the guile-2.0 update that Ludovic requested.
The patch fails to apply:
http://hydra.gnu.org:3000/build/1405519/nixlog/1/tail-reload
Hopefully it is not needed any more?
Andreas
On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 08:42:46PM +, ng0 wrote:
> This is weird. I ran this 2 days ago with no failing tests.
> I'll see if I had an update I did not post.
This could also be a sign of non-determinism. As posted two days ago,
I had packages that failed on hydra, but built correctly locally.
S
Hi,
Andreas Enge writes:
> Hello,
>
> On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 01:52:49PM +, ng0 wrote:
>> This patch updates (input) of libextractor, adding some optional
>> dependencies we packaged already.
>
> thanks! I could not resist to order the inputs alphabetically, updated
> patch attached...
>
> U
> Or do you mean, test failures in only two packages, and the
> other ones are fine?
Yep that's what I meant. It mainly required setting env variables
and adding a xorgserver-start, dbus-launch phase to some packages
like has been done before. Sorry if it was unclear.
On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 04:08:37PM +0200, David Craven wrote:
> So all test failures except two are resolved.
> I think this is getting to a mergeable state
This sounds like a contradiction to me...
Or do you mean, test failures in only two packages, and the
other ones are fine?
Andreas
Hello,
On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 01:52:49PM +, ng0 wrote:
> This patch updates (input) of libextractor, adding some optional
> dependencies we packaged already.
thanks! I could not resist to order the inputs alphabetically, updated
patch attached...
Unfortunately, it fails a test for me:
PASS:
On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 01:11:09PM +, ng0 wrote:
> Despite the misleading title (I included a forward of the original
> release message) this is a patch and it is quickly applied and build. I
> think we should keep up to date with crypto software like tor.
The patch title was good; pushed in 4
On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 12:57:54PM +0200, Andreas Enge wrote:
> a while ago, I packaged qjson, presumably as a prerequisite for some version
> of KDE. It needs Qt-4 and currently is not a dependency of anything.
> Are you okay with me deleting it from the distribution?
Done!
Andreas
On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 06:27:17PM +, ng0 wrote:
> Leo Famulari writes:
> > So the package is ready to merge?
>
> From my perspective yes. We have to add a smaller socks server/library
> than ghc-socks, when that is done I can add --with-socks. This patch
> clarifies this in a comment.
Great
Leo Famulari writes:
> On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 10:01:39PM +, ng0 wrote:
>> TL;DR: Guix on Gentoo, need testers with moar isolated Gentoo
>> VMs/systems. Don't blame me when it breaks your precious system, I said
>> I needed testers.
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Since Gentoo upstream decided to final
Hello,
On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 10:53:11AM +0200, Tomáš Čech wrote:
> * gnu/packages/bash.scm(bash-completion): Update to 2.3, add autoreconf
> phase, change origin to Github.
> * gnu/packages/patches/bash-completion-directories.patch: Rework - same
> purpose, different code.
just the quick st
> To follow-up on my last comment, I believe that qemu-minimal is used to
> build GuixSD VMs and disk images. So, that's the context in which to
> decide whether qemu-minimal needs spice / virglrenderer support.
I'll add spice and virglrenderer to the list of deleted packages for
qemu-minimal and
On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 08:37:30PM +0200, David Craven wrote:
> * gnu/packages/python.scm (python-ipaddress): New package.
> (python2-ipaddress): New package.
I believe we already have python2-ipaddress, although an older version.
Great news if you can update it and enable the tests!
Fixed. Can someone review and apply it?
From 7079fabc8eee8913df79346cd5747837a3262825 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: ng0
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2016 08:18:14 +
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add libunique.
* gnu/packages/gnome.scm (libunique): New variable.
---
gnu/packages/gnome.scm | 37
* gnu/packages/python.scm (python-url): New package.
(python2-url): New package.
---
gnu/packages/python.scm | 27 +++
1 file changed, 27 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/python.scm b/gnu/packages/python.scm
index b1ba8e5..4f2eba2 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/python.
* gnu/packages/python.scm (python-schematics): New package.
(python2-schematics): New package.
---
gnu/packages/python.scm | 29 +
1 file changed, 29 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/python.scm b/gnu/packages/python.scm
index 3eab007..2627dc8 100644
--- a/gnu/
* gnu/packages/python.scm (python-nltk): New package.
(python2-nltk): New package.
---
gnu/packages/python.scm | 21 +
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/python.scm b/gnu/packages/python.scm
index bea635c..c480bc4 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/python.scm
* gnu/packages/python.scm (define-module): Add import.
---
gnu/packages/python.scm | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/python.scm b/gnu/packages/python.scm
index 470bad8..fc52b6c 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/python.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/python.scm
@@ -46,6 +46,7 @@
* gnu/packages/python.scm (python-binaryornot): New package.
(python2-binaryornot): New package.
---
gnu/packages/python.scm | 29 +
1 file changed, 29 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/python.scm b/gnu/packages/python.scm
index fc52b6c..bea635c 100644
--- a/gn
* gnu/packages/python.scm (python-ipaddress): New package.
(python2-ipaddress): New package.
---
gnu/packages/python.scm | 21 +
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/python.scm b/gnu/packages/python.scm
index 4f2eba2..c8d169a 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/p
On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 08:28:35PM +0200, David Craven wrote:
> Ludo looked at them and asked me to resubmit, it's mainly adding the
> documentation and splitting a commit into two...
Okay, then I think it's good.
To follow-up on my last comment, I believe that qemu-minimal is used to
build GuixS
* gnu/packages/python.scm (python-publicsuffix2): New package.
(python2-publicsuffix2): New package.
---
gnu/packages/python.scm | 23 +++
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/python.scm b/gnu/packages/python.scm
index 4de5024..b1ba8e5 100644
--- a/gnu/
* gnu/packages/python.scm (python-sh): New package.
(python2-sh): New package.
---
gnu/packages/python.scm | 23 +++
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/python.scm b/gnu/packages/python.scm
index 3a1552d..3eab007 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/python.scm
++
* guix/import/utils.scm (define-module): guix licenses import uses a prefix.
(string->licenses): Add license: prefix to licenses.
(license->symbol): Add license: prefix to licenses. Return a symbol with the
prefix license:.
---
guix/import/utils.scm | 26 +-
1 file ch
* gnu/packages/python.scm (python-pymongo): New package.
(python2-pymongo): New package.
---
gnu/packages/python.scm | 22 ++
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/python.scm b/gnu/packages/python.scm
index c480bc4..3a1552d 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/pyth
* gnu/packages/python.scm (python-publicsuffix): New package.
(python2-publicsuffix): New package.
---
gnu/packages/python.scm | 24
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/python.scm b/gnu/packages/python.scm
index 2627dc8..4de5024 100644
--- a/gnu/p
On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 03:45:29PM +0200, David Craven wrote:
> * gnu/packages/qemu.scm (qemu)[inputs]: Add SPICE and VIRGLRENDERER.
> [arguments]: Pass --enable-spice.
Do spice and virglrenderer belong in qemu-minimal, or should they be
removed from it?
> ---
> gnu/packages/qemu.scm | 4
Ludo looked at them and asked me to resubmit, it's mainly adding the
documentation and splitting a commit into two...
Leo Famulari writes:
> On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 04:11:38PM +, ng0 wrote:
>> Leo Famulari writes:
>>
>> > On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 03:48:53PM +, ng0 wrote:
>> >> It looks like this is not complete yet:
>> >>
>> >> ng0@shadowwalker ~$ strace irc
>> >
>> > What should we be looking for in t
On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 08:12:29PM +0200, Andreas Enge wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 04:33:03PM +0200, David Craven wrote:
> > No comment means these patches are ok to merge?
>
> Or that nobody looked at them? :-)
> Unfortunately I have no service expertise; hopefully someone else
> can have a
PS: Okay to update the existing packages to the latest version, of course.
On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 04:36:01PM +0200, David Craven wrote:
> Andreas, did you merge the qt-base patch yet?
Yes, commits 7972d8a2e98af6592050a37036c2c80a01358fcf
(and cce28b0c3ad14c42e08500bb51b23ba02ed449a2 and
2470d779c9105c7ac7d03bd27bd53da0548384c4).
> After I do some license auditing, is i
ng0 writes:
> Leo Famulari writes:
>
>> On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 02:57:10PM +, ng0 wrote:
>>> From 81f605a551a3cfcfe48fae27fd7aa5d9affa4bd2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>>> From: ng0
>>> Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2016 14:44:38 +
>>> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: gnurl: Update to 7.50.1.
>>>
>>> * gnu/packag
On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 04:33:03PM +0200, David Craven wrote:
> No comment means these patches are ok to merge?
Or that nobody looked at them? :-)
Unfortunately I have no service expertise; hopefully someone else
can have a look at this.
Andreas
On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 10:01:39PM +, ng0 wrote:
> TL;DR: Guix on Gentoo, need testers with moar isolated Gentoo
> VMs/systems. Don't blame me when it breaks your precious system, I said
> I needed testers.
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Since Gentoo upstream decided to finally solve their very old #355355
>
On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 04:11:38PM +, ng0 wrote:
> Leo Famulari writes:
>
> > On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 03:48:53PM +, ng0 wrote:
> >> It looks like this is not complete yet:
> >>
> >> ng0@shadowwalker ~$ strace irc
> >
> > What should we be looking for in this trace?
>
> Apparently nothin
On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 06:50:30PM +0200, Andy Wingo wrote:
> Why would you sign a commit if you don't attest to intermediate unsigned
> commits?
If I push A-B-C with a signed HEAD immediately after somebody pushes a
forged D, won't it look like I vouch for D? How could a 3rd party tell
whether D
On Fri 05 Aug 2016 16:59, Leo Famulari writes:
> On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 09:35:59AM +0200, Andy Wingo wrote:
>> Yeah. I guess I don't see see "author misattribution on unsigned
>> commits" as part of the threat model.
>>
>> My mental model is that if you have a signed commit A with unsigned
>>
Ricardo Wurmus writes:
> Ludovic Courtès writes:
>
>> Ricardo Wurmus skribis:
>>
>>> * guix/import/cran.scm (description->package): Return package
>>> dependencies in addition to generated package expression.
>>
>> What would you think of making it return a SRFI-41 stream of packages
>> inst
Leo Famulari writes:
> On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 03:48:53PM +, ng0 wrote:
>> It looks like this is not complete yet:
>>
>> ng0@shadowwalker ~$ strace irc
>
> What should we be looking for in this trace?
Apparently nothing because I did not rtfm enough.
...
export IRCSERVER="SSLIRC/chat.freen
Leo Famulari writes:
> On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 02:57:10PM +, ng0 wrote:
>> From 81f605a551a3cfcfe48fae27fd7aa5d9affa4bd2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: ng0
>> Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2016 14:44:38 +
>> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: gnurl: Update to 7.50.1.
>>
>> * gnu/packages/gnunet.scm (gnurl): U
On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 03:48:53PM +, ng0 wrote:
> It looks like this is not complete yet:
>
> ng0@shadowwalker ~$ strace irc
What should we be looking for in this trace?
On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 02:57:10PM +, ng0 wrote:
> From 81f605a551a3cfcfe48fae27fd7aa5d9affa4bd2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: ng0
> Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2016 14:44:38 +
> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: gnurl: Update to 7.50.1.
>
> * gnu/packages/gnunet.scm (gnurl): Update to 7.50.1.
> [configure-f
ng0 writes:
> ng0 writes:
>
>> Indeed, not needed. Fixed:
>
> Well.. now it is fixed. Last patch was wrong. Blame multi-multitasking.
>
> From 9b383fff3ea117f5de5a096fdef1dc22cca4dc5c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: ng0
> Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2016 19:31:23 +
> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add ircii.
On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 11:06:36AM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote:
> Also, I can do the guile-2.0 update that Ludovic requested.
This I pushed as bd21159eba2cce3ca7226faa4772df64df06605d
> Okay, thanks! But, shouldn't we merge master into python-updates first?
> The python-updates branch was rather ol
On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 02:13:08PM +0200, Andreas Enge wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 05:54:21PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 05:23:24PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote:
> > > I'd like to upgrade setuptools as well. I should have pushed a patch for
> > > that in an hour or so.
Andreas, did you merge the qt-base patch yet?
After I do some license auditing, is it ok to merge kde framework
tier1? Or do you prefer me to dump the patches on the mailinglist
again? =)
On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 11:10:39AM +0200, Vincent Legoll wrote:
> I'm doing an usb install in a VM, and I saw an error message
> during boot (of the usb image & of the installed system) from
> nscd, it says it cannot find /etc/resolv.conf
>
> After the first reboot the file is there though
>
> So
From 81f605a551a3cfcfe48fae27fd7aa5d9affa4bd2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: ng0
Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2016 14:44:38 +
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: gnurl: Update to 7.50.1.
* gnu/packages/gnunet.scm (gnurl): Update to 7.50.1.
[configure-flags]: Configure with --disable-smb.
Disable test1139.
---
gnu/pac
On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 09:35:59AM +0200, Andy Wingo wrote:
> Yeah. I guess I don't see see "author misattribution on unsigned
> commits" as part of the threat model.
>
> My mental model is that if you have a signed commit A with unsigned
> parents B, C, ..., that it's the person who signed commi
* guix/ui.scm (package->recutils): Format origin.
---
guix/ui.scm | 18 ++
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
diff --git a/guix/ui.scm b/guix/ui.scm
index 4d1b65c..e232548 100644
--- a/guix/ui.scm
+++ b/guix/ui.scm
@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
(define-module (guix ui)
#:use-module (guix ut
This updates gnurl to 7.50.1.
From 79d11083b763a3fb122bf57e094517e9b0376d79 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: ng0
Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2016 14:44:38 +
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: gnurl: Update to 7.50.1.
* gnu/packages/gnunet.scm (gnurl): Update to 7.50.1.
[configure-flags]: Configure with --disable-smb.
David Craven wrote:
> I aborted, since I realised that guix package -s doesn't include the
> source url and hash, which would be important for a testsuite...
IMHO, if the rec data is the only way to get to the packages data, the
source url would be rather essential to get in.
--
Cordially
Phili
No comment means these patches are ok to merge?
So now that 0.11.0 was merged can the update to mesa 12.0.0 go into
core-updates?
On Fri, 05 Aug 2016 15:47:50 +0200
Andy Wingo wrote:
> On Fri 05 Aug 2016 14:18, Julien Lepiller writes:
>
> > here is a patch that adds a service definition for openssh.
>
> Very nice!
>
> > + (let ((pid (primitive-fork)))
> > +(case pid
> > + ((0)
> > + (ex
On Fri 05 Aug 2016 14:18, Julien Lepiller writes:
> here is a patch that adds a service definition for openssh.
Very nice!
> + (let ((pid (primitive-fork)))
> +(case pid
> + ((0)
> + (execl (string-append #$openssh "/bin/ssh-keygen")
> + "ssh-key
Hello,
here is a patch that adds a service definition for openssh.
Regards,
Julien Lepiller>From 592ab25424b2685238e31a3e2473e31a45bea4e5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Julien Lepiller
Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2016 15:20:15 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] services: Add openssh
* gnu/packages/ssh.scm: Openssh re
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> n...@we.make.ritual.n0.is skribis:
>
>> Ludovic Courtès writes:
>
> [...]
>
>>> I suppose TB contains a script that does all that, right? Would it work
>>> to simply run it? If it invokes wget/curl, then this needs to be
>>> replaced, but the rest should be fine.
>>
>>
ng0 writes:
> Indeed, not needed. Fixed:
Well.. now it is fixed. Last patch was wrong. Blame multi-multitasking.
>From 9b383fff3ea117f5de5a096fdef1dc22cca4dc5c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: ng0
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2016 19:31:23 +
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add ircii.
* gnu/packages/irc.scm (irci
Despite the misleading title (I included a forward of the original
release message) this is a patch and it is quickly applied and build. I
think we should keep up to date with crypto software like tor.
Could someone please review this?
ng0 writes:
> Hi,
>
> this patch updates tor to 0.2.8.6.
>
>
Indeed, not needed. Fixed:
>From 1438e5654cfd5f4eb4141a42580bd73c716e7134 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: ng0
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2016 19:31:23 +
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add ircii.
* gnu/packages/irc.scm (ircii): New variable.
---
gnu/packages/irc.scm | 46
ng0 writes:
> Ricardo Wurmus writes:
>
>> Why is this needed? Did you try using #:configure-flags instead of
>> replacing the configure phase? You can refer to inputs with
>> “%build-inputs” there.
>>
>> ~~ Ricardo
>>
>
> Thanks, README made me try with ./configure --switches first.
> Fixed in
Ricardo Wurmus writes:
> Why is this needed? Did you try using #:configure-flags instead of
> replacing the configure phase? You can refer to inputs with
> “%build-inputs” there.
>
> ~~ Ricardo
>
Thanks, README made me try with ./configure --switches first.
Fixed in this version. I'm still tes
guix package prints its output in rec format. You can use recutils to process
the output.
Am 5. August 2016 13:04:49 MESZ, schrieb David Craven :
>I aborted, since I realised that guix package -s doesn't include the
>source url and hash, which would be important for a testsuite...
>
>Some interes
Hello,
Jan Synáček writes:
> I'm getting strange errors:
>
> ...
> HELP2MAN doc/guix-daemon.1
> help2man: can't get `--help' info from guix-daemon
> Try `--no-discard-stderr' if option outputs to stderr
> WARNING: 'help2man' is missing on your system.
> You should only need it if you mo
On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 05:54:21PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 05:23:24PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote:
> > I'd like to upgrade setuptools as well. I should have pushed a patch for
> > that in an hour or so.
> This is done. Hopefully it all works!
I added a jobset on hydra:
Alex Vong writes:
> John Darrington writes:
>
>> I would not be at all suprised if there were more incompatibilities like
>> this. Ought we not have a lint rule that checks this?
>>
> Indeed, in the short term, we could lint for special case, such that
> openssl appears as an input for an GPLv
ng0 writes:
> Ricardo Wurmus writes:
>
>> ng0 writes:
>>
>>> Thanks, in the new revision of the patch both issues you two found are
>>> fixed.
>>
>>> + (replace 'configure
>>> + (lambda* (#:key inputs outputs #:allow-other-keys)
>>> + (let ((out (assoc-ref outputs
I aborted, since I realised that guix package -s doesn't include the
source url and hash, which would be important for a testsuite...
Some interesting measurements:
guix package --list-available | grep -o --regex "^[a-zA-Z0-9-]*" | wc -l
3797
cat guix-metadata.txt | grep --regex "^name: .*$" | wc
* gnu/packages/node.scm (node): Update to 6.3.1.
---
gnu/packages/node.scm | 32 ++--
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/node.scm b/gnu/packages/node.scm
index 887ef93..4c98799 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/node.scm
+++ b/gnu/packag
Please disregard this patch,
I was a wee bit impatient with trying out git send-mail
- Jelle
2016-08-05 12:28 GMT+02:00 Jelle Licht :
> * gnu/packages/node.scm (node): Update to 6.3.1.
> ---
> gnu/packages/node.scm | 35 ---
> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 1
Ricardo Wurmus writes:
> ng0 writes:
>
>> Thanks, in the new revision of the patch both issues you two found are
>> fixed.
>
>> + (replace 'configure
>> + (lambda* (#:key inputs outputs #:allow-other-keys)
>> + (let ((out (assoc-ref outputs "out"))
>> +
* gnu/packages/node.scm (node): Update to 6.3.1.
---
gnu/packages/node.scm | 35 ---
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/node.scm b/gnu/packages/node.scm
index 887ef93..f62555e 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/node.scm
+++ b/gnu/pac
This should works, but it's pretty slow...
guix package --list-available | grep -o --regex "^[a-zA-Z0-9-]*" |
xargs -n1 guix package -s 1> guix-metadata.txt
time sh -c "guix package -s guix &> /dev/null"
sh -c "guix package -s guix &> /dev/null" 2.42s user 0.07s system
113% cpu 2.203 total
ng0 writes:
> This (my.notmuch) used to work for a long time and broke today:
>
> ng0@shadowwalker ~$ my.notmuch
> Tor mode activated. Every command will be torified for this shell.
> Segmentation fault
> Tor mode deactivated. Command will NOT go through Tor anymore.
>
> This is the same as:
>
>
Sorry for the reply to all...
Argh
Hello,
I'm doing an usb install in a VM, and I saw an error message
during boot (of the usb image & of the installed system) from
nscd, it says it cannot find /etc/resolv.conf
After the first reboot the file is there though
So this is probably not that important.
During the first guix pull & sy
John Darrington writes:
> I would not be at all suprised if there were more incompatibilities like
> this. Ought we not have a lint rule that checks this?
>
Indeed, in the short term, we could lint for special case, such that
openssl appears as an input for an GPLv[123](+) package.
In the lon
ng0 writes:
> John Darrington writes:
>
>> I would not be at all suprised if there were more incompatibilities like
>> this. Ought we not have a lint rule that checks this?
>>
>> J'
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 12:35:54AM +0800, Alex Vong wrote:
>> Hi guixes,
>>
>> First, cong
Hello,
I'm getting strange errors:
...
HELP2MAN doc/guix-daemon.1
help2man: can't get `--help' info from guix-daemon
Try `--no-discard-stderr' if option outputs to stderr
WARNING: 'help2man' is missing on your system.
You should only need it if you modified a dependency of a man page.
Erik Edrosa writes:
> Hello guix-devel,
>
> This is a patch to add guile-commonmark, a fully specified variant of
> Markdown written in pure Guile.
>
Hi Erik,
this is very nice! I didn’t know this existed.
The patch looked good and I tested it right away in a REPL. Pushed as
e28e74a518b03de
Erik Edrosa (2016-08-05 05:08 +0300) wrote:
> Hello guix-devel,
>
> This is a patch to add guile-commonmark, a fully specified variant of
> Markdown written in pure Guile.
>
> Thanks,
> Erik
>
> From 94785c022cf25e69bd7b46aa455c80fa5ea84989 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Erik Edrosa
> Date: Thu
On Thu 04 Aug 2016 22:05, Leo Famulari writes:
> On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 06:55:34PM +0200, Andy Wingo wrote:
>> On Thu 04 Aug 2016 18:44, Leo Famulari writes:
>>
>> > How would the rest of us distinguish between
>> >
>> > 1) a range of your commits with a signed HEAD
>> > 2) a range of your com
93 matches
Mail list logo
