alírio eyng writes:
> i suggested renaming:
> readline, libunistring, htslib, c-ares, json-c, icu4c, ...
> to:
> c-readline, c-unistring, c-hts, c-ares, c-json, c-icu, ...
>
> no replies, is that implicit agreement?
I strongly disagree with this as it makes things needlessly confusing,
in my op
i suggested renaming:
readline, libunistring, htslib, c-ares, json-c, icu4c, ...
to:
c-readline, c-unistring, c-hts, c-ares, c-json, c-icu, ...
no replies, is that implicit agreement?
On 05/01/2016 06:41 PM, Leo Famulari wrote:
> I wanted to make sure the updates to mock and unittest2 wouldn't break
> anything. No problems!
I also managed to rebuild a bunch of packages on my machine. I only
failed to rebuild those that required LaTeX because I ran out of disk
space :)
Cyril.
On 05/03/2016 08:25 PM, Efraim Flashner wrote:
> Based on the description, does it make sense to have a python- version
> and not just a python2- version?
It would make sense not to use funcsigs with Python 3.4+, but I think
some people might use it in Python 3 code, so it might end up being
requi
On 04/30/2016 11:33 PM, Leo Famulari wrote:
> As with python-cmd2, could you if setuptools is required for the
> python-3 variant?
>
So, I applied the following patch:
--- a/gnu/packages/python.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/python.scm
@@ -1520,8 +1520,7 @@ matching them against a list of media-ranges.
On 05/03/2016 08:19 PM, Efraim Flashner wrote:
> python2-unittest2 had a different url before than the python- version.
> Is it all using the same source now?
It seems to be working using the same source, so... :)
Cyril.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Hello Guix!
>
> Thanks to Siddhesh Poyarekar of glibc & co., Guix patches can now be
> tracked on this Patchwork instance:
>
> http://patchwork.sourceware.org/project/guix/list/
Awesome, thanks!
> Actions can be taken on the Web interface, provided you
Pretty trivial change, just updated the version number and verified the
new hash.
Thanks,
--
Alex Griffin
From 54368a6f82aa0567c670fc72de1c9924470ace7d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alex Griffin
Date: Thu, 5 May 2016 18:25:45 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: wesnoth: Update to 1.12.5.
---
gnu/pack
On Thu, May 5, 2016, at 05:34 PM, Efraim Flashner wrote:
> I'm totally not a lawyer, but I believe officially and legally any
> change you make is yours and needs/should have a copyright line.
> On the other side, I believe that if you make a change and don't
> attach your name to it then it's as i
On Thu, May 05, 2016 at 10:17:36AM -0500, Alex Griffin wrote:
> Also, is this a large enough change that I should I have added my name
> to the copyright notice? I have a few more patches nearly ready to
> submit once I figure out this process, and I'm wondering what the
> threshold is. What if all
On Thu, May 05, 2016 at 09:52:32AM -0500, Alex Griffin wrote:
> Hello Guixlings,
>
> One thing I think the Guix project should do is work with the
> reproducible builds folks to publish a document explaining the issues
> involved with self-hosted compilers. It should encourage language
> communiti
Talk is at
http://www.ustream.tv/recorded/86424059 start @ 38 min.
On Thu, May 05, 2016 at 06:34:25PM +0200, Pjotr Prins wrote:
> On Thu, May 05, 2016 at 03:27:24PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> > Pjotr Prins skribis:
> >
> > > I am presenting GNU Guix in a lightning talk at Dconf
> > > (http
Hello,
I'm a new Guix user and I created a package for Seren, a P2P VoIP
conference program which uses Opus as codec.
I would like to thank the for helping me on IRC.
--
FrafraFrom ecffe90a83f8ae0dddef49cfb115e28b854b5d62 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Francesco Frassinelli
Date: Thu, 5 May 201
Ludovic Courtès (2016-05-05 17:58 +0300) wrote:
> Leo Famulari skribis:
>
>> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 10:23:19PM +0200, Hartmut Goebel wrote:
>>> * gnu/pyckages/python.csm (wrap-python3): Create symlinks for
>>> pip and python-config, too.
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>> +++ b/gnu/packages/python.scm
>>> -
On Thu, May 05, 2016 at 03:27:24PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Pjotr Prins skribis:
>
> > I am presenting GNU Guix in a lightning talk at Dconf
> > (http://dconf.org/2016/schedule/). The slides are here:
> >
> > http://biobeat.org/dconf2016.pdf
>
> Nice slides, it’s good that you’re talkin
Also, is this a large enough change that I should I have added my name
to the copyright notice? I have a few more patches nearly ready to
submit once I figure out this process, and I'm wondering what the
threshold is. What if all I do is update a version number+hash?
Thanks,
--
Alex Griffin
On T
Jelle Licht writes:
> I have taken the liberty to try my hand at finishing this, as I figured
> it would be a good way for me to get more familiar with 'the Guix way'
> of packaging things.
Thanks!
Also, could you please use this email address for further CC
things (I tend to avoid them complete
There's really no reason for other programs to need to see your bash
prompt, so I removed a couple `export` keywords from the default bashrc.
--
Alex Griffin
From 597c788a6604bcd84a24a469d92c1fbd47f4bedb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alex Griffin
Date: Thu, 5 May 2016 09:59:03 -0500
Subject: [PA
Leo Famulari skribis:
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 10:23:19PM +0200, Hartmut Goebel wrote:
>> * gnu/pyckages/python.csm (wrap-python3): Create symlinks for
>> pip and python-config, too.
>
> [...]
>
>> +++ b/gnu/packages/python.scm
>> - `("python3" ,"pydoc3" ,"idle3")
>> -
Jan Nieuwenhuizen skribis:
> From e3d01e6075ece0269131fb35cd560c05d37a586e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Jan Nieuwenhuizen
> Date: Tue, 3 May 2016 18:48:40 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH 6a/10] gnu: Add libiconv.
>
> * gnu/packages/base.scm (libiconv): New variable.
Pushed with minor changes, notab
Hello Guixlings,
One thing I think the Guix project should do is work with the
reproducible builds folks to publish a document explaining the issues
involved with self-hosted compilers. It should encourage language
communities to continuously maintain some way to build their language
starting from
On Thu, May 5, 2016, at 08:35 AM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>
> Yeah it’s OK to do it in the order: write the package bootstrapped from
> the binary blob, and then work on bootstrapping it from OCaml.
I do not think that bootstrapping Rust from OCaml is a practical goal.
When you guys have talked a
Efraim Flashner skribis:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 12:04:21AM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
[...]
>> > +(license gpl2)))
>>
>> v2-only?
>
> I thought this was strange and I took another look at the website and
> the code and it turns out it is gpl2 only.
Just to be clear, what matters to
Jelle Licht skribis:
> Now there are two approaches which might make sense to me:
>
> 1) We package a recent stage-0 binary (thus adding yet another random
> binary to the mix)
This is something we want to avoid as much as possible. Part of the
solution is to raise awareness about the security
Pjotr Prins skribis:
> I am presenting GNU Guix in a lightning talk at Dconf
> (http://dconf.org/2016/schedule/). The slides are here:
>
> http://biobeat.org/dconf2016.pdf
Nice slides, it’s good that you’re talking about the negative aspects of
per-language package managers and how we can work
Note: if you use emacs interface from a git checkout [as described in
the bottom of (info "(guix) Emacs Initial Setup")], everything should
work as expected.
Hello Ludo, this is not related to system tests, but in this patchset
you also moved 'memoize' to (guix combinators). In commit 86670ca4b7
26 matches
Mail list logo
