On 2016-04-06 17:05, Leo Famulari wrote:
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 07:33:17PM -0600, ren...@openmailbox.org wrote:
* gnu/packages/gnome.scm (liboauth): New variable.
This package looks good, but I think it should either go into an
existing package module, or into a new module called oauth.scm.
On Sat, Apr 09, 2016 at 08:52:12PM -0500, Christopher Allan Webber wrote:
> Leo Famulari writes:
>
> > Did you try something like this?
> >
> > (arguments
> > `(#:make-flags (string-append "install_prefix= (assoc-ref %outputs
> > "out"
>
> This didn't fix it, but it die send me along the ri
On Sat, Apr 09, 2016 at 09:46:34PM -0500, ren...@openmailbox.org wrote:
> On 2016-04-06 17:05, Leo Famulari wrote:
> >On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 07:33:17PM -0600, ren...@openmailbox.org wrote:
> >>* gnu/packages/gnome.scm (liboauth): New variable.
> >
> >This package looks good, but I think it should
On 2016-04-06 17:05, Leo Famulari wrote:
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 07:33:17PM -0600, ren...@openmailbox.org wrote:
* gnu/packages/gnome.scm (liboauth): New variable.
This package looks good, but I think it should either go into an
existing package module, or into a new module called oauth.scm.
Leo Famulari writes:
> Did you try something like this?
>
> (arguments
> `(#:make-flags (string-append "install_prefix= (assoc-ref %outputs "out"
This didn't fix it, but it die send me along the right path. Working
xscreensaver attached!
Note, for locking to work on guixsd, you'll need som
On Sat, Apr 09, 2016 at 10:59:03PM +0300, Efraim Flashner wrote:
> We do have some packages that have to be updated together, acme and
> letsencrypt, python-cryptography and python-cryptography-vectors. But
> those do have a commit message that they are updated together.
If those packages were upd
Efraim Flashner writes:
> On Sat, Apr 09, 2016 at 07:19:58PM +0200, Andreas Enge wrote:
>> On Sat, Apr 09, 2016 at 07:37:13PM +0300, Alex Kost wrote:
>> > But these are 2 different packages from 2 different sources, so I still
>> > think it makes sense to update them in 2 commits. I hope other p
On Sat, Apr 09, 2016 at 07:19:58PM +0200, Andreas Enge wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 09, 2016 at 07:37:13PM +0300, Alex Kost wrote:
> > But these are 2 different packages from 2 different sources, so I still
> > think it makes sense to update them in 2 commits. I hope other people
> > tell what is preferab
On 4/9/16, Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli wrote:
> alírio eyng wrote:
>> so mame is not just an emulator.
>> it is a emulator, disassembler and debugger.
...
>> is there a similar environment to a current architecture?
> community/qtspim 9.1.17-2
> New user interface for spim, a MIPS simulator.
not r
* gnu/packages/docbook.scm (docbook-xml-4.1.2): New variable.
---
gnu/packages/docbook.scm | 30 +++---
1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/docbook.scm b/gnu/packages/docbook.scm
index 9f5fbf1..2bd86fe 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/docbo
Hello,
Here is reposurgeon, and docbook-xml-4.1.2 which is one of its dependencies.
While reading the documentation in order to make the build reproducible, I
have found a recommendation to use ‘guix archive ...’ without a pointer, which
in my case would have been helpful.
Thanks in advance for
* doc/guix.texi (Common Build Options): Add a reference to 'Invoking
guix archive'.
---
doc/guix.texi | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/doc/guix.texi b/doc/guix.texi
index dcc1124..6c7107c 100644
--- a/doc/guix.texi
+++ b/doc/guix.texi
@@ -4057,8 +4057,9 @@
* gnu/packages/version-control.scm (reposurgeon): New variable.
---
gnu/packages/version-control.scm | 68 ++--
1 file changed, 66 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/version-control.scm b/gnu/packages/version-control.scm
index 0b70d54..bc2
Ludovic Courtès (2016-04-09 18:08 +0300) wrote:
[...]
> Woow, thanks for taking the time to do it!
Heh, it didn't take too much, actually.
> (If you haven’t done it already, you can check with ‘guix lint -t
> derivation’ that all the files are found, and run, say, ‘guix build
> libreoffice -d’ a
On Sat, Apr 09, 2016 at 07:37:13PM +0300, Alex Kost wrote:
> But these are 2 different packages from 2 different sources, so I still
> think it makes sense to update them in 2 commits. I hope other people
> tell what is preferable here on their opinions, thanks.
Yes, we always work on one package
Andreas Enge (2016-04-09 14:42 +0300) wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 11:54:49PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> Alex Kost skribis:
>> > P.S. Actually, I don't like 'search-patches' name. Better ideas?
>> No! I like it.
>
> How about "find-patches"? This would be analogous to "find-files".
Please keep guix-devel Cc-ed!
ra...@openmailbox.org (2016-04-09 15:43 +0300) wrote:
> On 2016-04-09 08:47, Alex Kost wrote:
>> ra...@openmailbox.org (2016-04-07 23:12 +0300) wrote:
>>
>>> pcmanfm (and its library libfm) were at version 1.2.3 from 2 years
>>> ago. This patch updates them to 1.2.4,
On Sat, Apr 09, 2016 at 12:54:43PM +0200, Mathieu Lirzin wrote:
> Leo Famulari writes:
>
> > On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 12:18:15PM +0200, Mathieu Lirzin wrote:
> >> Roel Janssen writes:
> >>
> >> > Strangely enough, I couldn't apply it either. I don't know what
> >> > happened.. I regenerated th
Alex Kost skribis:
> * gnu/packages/abiword.scm: Use 'search-patches' for 'patches' field.
> * gnu/packages/acl.scm: Likewise.
> * gnu/packages/admin.scm: Likewise.
> * gnu/packages/algebra.scm: Likewise.
> * gnu/packages/animation.scm: Likewise.
> * gnu/packages/apr.scm: Likewise.
> * gnu/packag
Alex Kost skribis:
> * gnu/packages.scm (search-patches): New macro.
[...]
> +(define-syntax-rule (search-patches file-name ...)
> + "Return the list of patches for each FILE-NAME."
Nitpick: “Return the list of absolute file names corresponding to each
FILE-NAME found in %PATCH-PATH.”
Otherw
iyzs...@member.fsf.org (宋文武) skribis:
> Hi! With the help of ‘guix refresh -t gnome’ I update many GNOME
> packages to latest (the 3.20 release) in the ‘gnome-updates’ branch.
>
> Also:
> glib: Disable tests in build phases instead of patches.
> gtk+: Enable SVG support. (by using gdk-pixbuf+
Alex Kost skribis:
> Ludovic Courtès (2016-04-05 23:50 +0300) wrote:
>
>> Alex Kost skribis:
>>
>>> * emacs/guix-ui-package.el (guix-package-info-insert-location)
>>> (guix-package-info-insert-license): New procedures.
>>> (guix-package-info-format): Use them.
>>> (guix-output-info-format): Like
Efraim Flashner skribis:
> It looks like `guix import gnu gzip` downloaded the .tar.xz copy, and
> that it also added it to the store, so when I built it the tarball was
> already in the store and I didn't notice that I forgot to change it from
> .tar.gz to .tar.xz.
OK, thanks for letting us kno
Alex Kost skribis:
> Andy Wingo (2016-04-07 13:08 +0300) wrote:
>
>> On Thu 07 Apr 2016 11:52, Alex Kost writes:
>>
>>> Eric Bavier (2016-04-06 17:57 +0300) wrote:
>>>
On Wed, 06 Apr 2016 15:13:47 +0300
Alex Kost wrote:
>>> [...]
> > + "1lgghck46p33z3hg8dnl76jryig4fh6d8rhz
On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 07:22:20AM +0300, Efraim Flashner wrote:
> I try very hard to not build qt on my laptop, mostly because of the long
> build time (7 hours on hydra [0]). Currently we download and use the big
> download of qt[1] and frankly I'd rather not. Qt does also ship in smaller
> bi
Hello!
Roel Janssen skribis:
> I think the licensing page on the website is pretty clear:
> http://ab-initio.mit.edu/wiki/index.php/NLopt_License_and_Copyright
>
> From the page:
>> The NLopt library is under the GNU Lesser General Public License
>> (LGPL), and the copyrights are owned by a vari
On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 11:54:49PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Alex Kost skribis:
> > P.S. Actually, I don't like 'search-patches' name. Better ideas?
> No! I like it.
How about "find-patches"? This would be analogous to "find-files".
Andreas
On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 02:46:42PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 12:02:28PM +0200, Pjotr Prins wrote:
> > I received a nice reply from Joe Armstrong. Basically he agrees with
> > the idea of deterministic builds and hashes for content of source
> > files
> >
> > http://joe
Leo Famulari writes:
> On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 12:18:15PM +0200, Mathieu Lirzin wrote:
>> Roel Janssen writes:
>>
>> > Strangely enough, I couldn't apply it either. I don't know what
>> > happened.. I regenerated the patch, and now I was able to apply it to
>> > my source tree. Hopefully it
On Mon, 4 Apr 2016 22:23:17 +
alírio eyng wrote:
> Felipe Sanches:
> >MAME provides an interactive debugger
> so mame is not just an emulator.
> it is a emulator, disassembler and debugger.
> this is relevant information i can't see in official documentation,
> thanks.
>
[...]
> a interest
ra...@openmailbox.org (2016-04-07 23:12 +0300) wrote:
> pcmanfm (and its library libfm) were at version 1.2.3 from 2 years
> ago. This patch updates them to 1.2.4, the most recent version from
> February.
> From 437fee1d56001da92b5b9cd65811d65b1316aec2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Raymond Nic
Alex Kost (2016-03-31 00:54 +0300) wrote:
> Mckinley Olsen (2016-03-30 02:52 +0300) wrote:
>
>> Package vte-ng, which is needed by termite terminal (which I hope to
>> package)
>
> Hello, this is a great patch for the first package! I have only a
> couple of nitpicks and one real question.
>
>> F
Ludovic Courtès (2016-04-08 00:54 +0300) wrote:
> Alex Kost skribis:
[...]
>> Talking about how we specify package patches currently, I think it would
>> be better to do it in a more clean and general way. What about adding
>> the following macro to (gnu packages)?
>>
>> (define-syntax-rule (s
* gnu/packages.scm (search-patches): New macro.
---
gnu/packages.scm | 5 +
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gnu/packages.scm b/gnu/packages.scm
index bbd460a..979d93a 100644
--- a/gnu/packages.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages.scm
@@ -37,6 +37,7 @@
#:use-module (srfi srfi-35)
#:use-mo
* gnu/packages/abiword.scm: Use 'search-patches' for 'patches' field.
* gnu/packages/acl.scm: Likewise.
* gnu/packages/admin.scm: Likewise.
* gnu/packages/algebra.scm: Likewise.
* gnu/packages/animation.scm: Likewise.
* gnu/packages/apr.scm: Likewise.
* gnu/packages/audacity.scm: Likewise.
* gnu/pa
Alex Kost (2016-04-09 00:32 +0300) wrote:
> From 8c58974b549479a8e97cf64f21393aa495596e13 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Alex Kost
> Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2016 00:21:15 +0300
> Subject: [PATCH] services: 'console-keymap-service' takes multiple files.
>
> * gnu/services/base.scm (console-keymap-servi
36 matches
Mail list logo
