On Mon, 01 Feb 2016 23:07:40 +0100
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) wrote:
>
> An idea I haven’t taken the time to test yet would be to use
> ‘properties’:
>
> (define python-foobar ;with Python 3
> (package
> (name "foobar")
> ;; Specify which Python 2 variant to use.
>
On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 05:51:33PM +0100, ren...@openmailbox.org wrote:
> Hi,
>
> i attached patch for review.
>
> Regards
> From 18bddcf21cac4245997a76d4ea5cfc856d1b6157 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Rene Saavedra
> Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2016 17:45:22 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] Add nautilus
>
> -
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Roel Janssen skribis:
>
>> Ludovic Courtès writes:
>>
>>> Roel Janssen skribis:
>>>
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Roel Janssen skribis:
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>> We might need to add a HTTP header from the GNU server to allow
>> loading data from external
Efraim Flashner skribis:
> I looked over the commit but not deeply enough yet, would it be possible to
> use some of the logic in this to fix the package-with-python2 issue?
Nope!
> what about extending guix package so you could do `guix package -i $(guix
> build foo --with-input=bar=baz) --nam
Dave Thompson skribis:
> Here's a patch set I've been sitting on for awhile for the AWS CLI. Do
> note that the AWS APIs are not exclusive to Amazon. Free software such
> as Eucalyptus [0] and OpenStack also implement these APIs for
> compatibility reasons, and both the boto library and awscli
On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 5:07 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> "Thompson, David" skribis:
>
>> On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 8:06 AM, Efraim Flashner
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I looked over the commit but not deeply enough yet, would it be possible to
>>> use some of the logic in this to fix the package-with-python2
Andreas Enge skribis:
> On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 08:49:10AM -0500, Thompson, David wrote:
>> Here's a potential solution for 'package-with-python2': module
>> introspection. AIUI, the issue is that some Python 2 packages need
>> extra manual tweaking, but 'package-with-python2' creates package
>>
"Thompson, David" skribis:
> On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 8:06 AM, Efraim Flashner wrote:
>
>> I looked over the commit but not deeply enough yet, would it be possible to
>> use some of the logic in this to fix the package-with-python2 issue?
>
> Here's a potential solution for 'package-with-python2':
Alex Sassmannshausen skribis:
> Arne Babenhauserheide writes:
[...]
>> I tend to write quick commandline tools which sometimes begin to grow
>> wild. Elegant commandline parsing is still one of the things with
>> which I had problems in Guile, and I hope that guile-config can fix
>> that.
>
> I
Hi Arne,
Arne Babenhauserheide writes:
> Hi Alex,
>
>> And my slides from the FOSDEM devroom (for my Guile Config
>> presentation), for anyone interested (copying in Guile User as it isn't
>> Guix related…):
>>
>> http://alex.pompo.co/presentations/fosdem-16-conf.html
>
> These are great — and I
On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 08:49:10AM -0500, Thompson, David wrote:
> Here's a potential solution for 'package-with-python2': module
> introspection. AIUI, the issue is that some Python 2 packages need
> extra manual tweaking, but 'package-with-python2' creates package
> variants without these tweaks
On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 11:35 AM, Efraim Flashner wrote:
> Not all of our python packages are in python.scm. Currently in
> guix/build-system/python.scm we have:
>
> (define package-with-python2
> ;; Note: delay call to 'default-python2' until after the 'arguments' field
> ;; of packages is ac
Hi,
i attached patch for review.
RegardsFrom 18bddcf21cac4245997a76d4ea5cfc856d1b6157 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rene Saavedra
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2016 17:45:22 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Add nautilus
---
gnu/packages/nautilus.scm | 63 +++
1 file chan
On Mon, 1 Feb 2016 08:49:10 -0500
"Thompson, David" wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 8:06 AM, Efraim Flashner wrote:
>
> > I looked over the commit but not deeply enough yet, would it be possible to
> > use some of the logic in this to fix the package-with-python2 issue?
>
> Here's a potentia
Hi Alex,
> And my slides from the FOSDEM devroom (for my Guile Config
> presentation), for anyone interested (copying in Guile User as it isn't
> Guix related…):
>
> http://alex.pompo.co/presentations/fosdem-16-conf.html
These are great — and I hope I can use guile-config. I tend to write
quick
On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 08:49:10AM -0500, Thompson, David wrote:
> Also, somewhat unrelated, package-with-python2 could add setuptools as
> an input to these packages so we can remove all the unnecessary usage
> of it in Python 3 packages.
+1 as it is often needed and harmless when it is not neede
On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 8:06 AM, Efraim Flashner wrote:
> I looked over the commit but not deeply enough yet, would it be possible to
> use some of the logic in this to fix the package-with-python2 issue?
Here's a potential solution for 'package-with-python2': module
introspection. AIUI, the iss
On Mon, 01 Feb 2016 10:18:01 +0100
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I’ve pushed my “train hacks”, which are a continuation of refactoring
> work I had done in December (ca. 64ec0e2):
>
> • ‘guix build’ has a new ‘--with-input’ option to rewrite the
> dependency graph so y
And my slides from the FOSDEM devroom (for my Guile Config
presentation), for anyone interested (copying in Guile User as it isn't
Guix related…):
http://alex.pompo.co/presentations/fosdem-16-conf.html
Ta,
Alex
Ricardo Wurmus writes:
> Here are the slides for my talk today:
>
> * “A gentle int
Hello,
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Hi there!
>
> I just came back from FOSDEM where we had an awesome Guile devroom with
> nice people and great talks!
I really want to echo Ludo's sentiments. I had a great time in our dev
room and it was really nice to put faces to the names I see popping up
in
On 01/02/16 19:04, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
The room of 80 seats was full pretty much all the time, and I think we
were all excited to see so many people stop by the devroom. Many shared
the impression that we were at an important moment of Guile’s history.
A good start to 2016, the year that Pjot
On Mon, 2016-02-01 at 10:04 +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> The room of 80 seats was full pretty much all the time, and I think we
> were all excited to see so many people stop by the devroom. Many shared
> the impression that we were at an important moment of Guile’s history.
> The transition wit
On Mon, 2016-02-01 at 11:41 +0100, Alex Sassmannshausen wrote:
> Hi Nala,
>
> Nala Ginrut writes:
>
> > On Mon, 2016-02-01 at 10:04 +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> >> The room of 80 seats was full pretty much all the time, and I think we
> >> were all excited to see so many people stop by the dev
Hi Nala,
Nala Ginrut writes:
> On Mon, 2016-02-01 at 10:04 +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> The room of 80 seats was full pretty much all the time, and I think we
>> were all excited to see so many people stop by the devroom. Many shared
>> the impression that we were at an important moment of G
This fixes interfaces with a dash or other characters being ignored.
* guix/build/syscalls.scm (%interface-line): Replace "[[:alnum:]]" with ".+".
---
guix/build/syscalls.scm | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/guix/build/syscalls.scm b/guix/build/syscalls.scm
inde
Hello!
I’ve pushed my “train hacks”, which are a continuation of refactoring
work I had done in December (ca. 64ec0e2):
• ‘guix build’ has a new ‘--with-input’ option to rewrite the
dependency graph so you can run:
guix build guix --with-input=guile=guile-next
and guess what it
Hi there!
I just came back from FOSDEM where we had an awesome Guile devroom with
nice people and great talks!
https://fosdem.org/2016/schedule/track/gnu_guile/
Some of the slides are already on-line, and hopefully videos will
follow, assuming everything went well with recordings (which is not
27 matches
Mail list logo
