On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 09:06:40AM -0600, Christopher Allan Webber wrote:
> I guess these things could be done through Guix itself. What I'd rather
> see though is a "./configure && make" compatible interface system for
> package building which uses Guile as its configuration language.
> Automake
On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 08:49:12PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 08:11:12PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote:
> > * gnu/packages/patches/w3m-force-ssl_verify_server-on.patch: New file.
> > * gnu/packages/patches/w3m-disable-sslv2-and-sslv3.patch: New file.
> > * gnu/packages/patches
* gnu/packages/patches/w3m-fix-compile.patch: Update to work with -p1.
* gnu/packages/w3m.scm (w3m): Drop patch flag -p0.
---
gnu/packages/patches/w3m-fix-compile.patch | 24 ++--
gnu/packages/w3m.scm | 2 +-
2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 7 deletions
* gnu/packages/patches/w3m-force-ssl_verify_server-on.patch: New file.
* gnu/packages/patches/w3m-disable-sslv2-and-sslv3.patch: New file.
* gnu/packages/patches/w3m-disable-weak-ciphers.patch: New file.
* gnu/packages/w3m.scm (w3m)[source]: Add patches.
* gnu-system.am (dist_patch_DATA): Add the n
On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 08:11:12PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote:
> * gnu/packages/patches/w3m-force-ssl_verify_server-on.patch: New file.
> * gnu/packages/patches/w3m-disable-sslv2-and-sslv3.patch: New file.
> * gnu/packages/patches/w3m-disable-weak-ciphers.patch: New file.
> * gnu/packages/w3m.scm (w
Here is another take on bug#16791.
This updates an existing patch to work with `patch -p1` and then applies
patches that enable SSL / TLS verification and disable broken SSL
protocols and ciphers.
Thoughts?
Leo Famulari (2):
gnu: w3m: Update patch to use '-p1'.
gnu: w3m: Enable SSL, disable
* gnu/packages/patches/w3m-fix-compile.patch: Update to work with -p1.
* gnu/packages/w3m.scm (w3m): Drop patch flag -p0.
---
gnu/packages/patches/w3m-fix-compile.patch | 24 ++--
gnu/packages/w3m.scm | 2 +-
2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 7 deletions
* gnu/packages/patches/w3m-force-ssl_verify_server-on.patch: New file.
* gnu/packages/patches/w3m-disable-sslv2-and-sslv3.patch: New file.
* gnu/packages/patches/w3m-disable-weak-ciphers.patch: New file.
* gnu/packages/w3m.scm (w3m)[source]: Add patches.
* gnu-system.am (dist_patch_DATA): Add the n
Michael Vetter skribis:
> From 29cd137d59bfa8b6f3f467ab120c2a8371da8c59 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Michael Vetter
> Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 09:37:05 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] doc: Remove double occurance of words.
>
> * doc/guix.texi: substitute 'the the' with 'the'.
Pushed with a fixlet for
This patch updates our boost package to version 1.60.0. It also fixes
several dependent packages to build with this later version. I've been
able to verify the x86-64 builds for all packages in `guix refresh -l
boost`, except for several packages that already fail to build in
current master (
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Go for it!
Done! Thanks for the review.
> Thank you, and apologies for the looong delay!
No problem, and apologies on my side too for the delays.
> Ludo’.
Taylan
Ben Woodcroft skribis:
> I had some trouble downloading dependencies because of inability to
> download sources e.g. http://graphviz.org/ seems to be down. Ruby
> seems to build though, can we just review as normal and then push to
> core-updates?
>
> I did rebuild all the packages in ruby.scm, a
Federico Beffa skribis:
> From e3dd3f2235b9aed36d213f68ea767225ec8ebd61 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Federico Beffa
> Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2015 00:47:29 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH 6/6] gnu: Add emacs-slime.
>
> * gnu/packages/emacs.scm (emacs-slime): New variable.
[...]
> +(inputs
> + `(
Federico Beffa skribis:
> From 5c2be0d7d628ba27ac1360cc8e998de68a505b2a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Federico Beffa
> Date: Sun, 27 Dec 2015 19:06:37 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH 5/6] gnu: mit-scheme: Generate and install documentation.
>
> * gnu/packages/scheme.scm (mit-scheme): Convert to the '
Federico Beffa skribis:
> If found a few times the need to download a single, uncompressed file
> which needs to be patched. The available fetch methods do not appear
> to be appropriate. So, I've added the function
> 'uncompressed-file-fetch'. This and the function
> 'broken-tarball-fetch' which
Federico Beffa skribis:
> From 77b339ef57692e5c930b2b659f53cb1c65352857 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Federico Beffa
> Date: Fri, 25 Dec 2015 23:21:11 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH 3/6] gnu: Add emacs-mit-scheme-doc.
>
> * gnu/packages/emacs.scm (emacs-mit-scheme-doc): New variable.
LGTM, thanks.
Federico Beffa skribis:
> From 8ec7a6b9467605ffe100cceda174e2b4aa0ea909 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Federico Beffa
> Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2015 13:29:54 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH 2/6] gnu: scmutils: Generate 'scmutils-autoloads.el' file.
>
> * gnu/packages/scheme.scm (scmutils): Do it.
Sure.
Lu
Federico Beffa skribis:
> On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 6:32 PM, Federico Beffa wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm not sure about the license of this package. It just sates:
>>
>> ;;; This code is written by Alex Shinn and placed in the Public
>> ;;; Domain. All warranties are disclaimed.
So this should be ‘pu
Ricardo Wurmus skribis:
> The following patches rename the packages “icedtea6” and “icedtea7” to
> just “icedtea”, and the variables “icedtea6” and “icedtea7” to
> “icedtea-6” and “icedtea-7”. They also add a default “icedtea”, which
> is just an alias for “icedtea-7”. Packages needing a JDK or
taylanbayi...@gmail.com (Taylan Ulrich "Bayırlı/Kammer") skribis:
> Returning to this issue after a long pause, I suddenly had a new idea,
> which is to use something akin to 'use-modules' instead of 'load' on the
> files. (I need a procedure and not a macro, and don't actually need to
> 'use' th
Ricardo Wurmus writes:
> Roel Janssen writes:
>
>> Thanks again for your time and helpful response. I hope this version of
>> the patch is fine.
>
> It is :) Thanks for your patience!
>
>> It is the Boost Software License v1. So I peeked at boost.scm and
>> copied that license (license:x11-st
I hope its right like this!
On Tue, 5 Jan 2016 11:40:40 -0500
Leo Famulari wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 09:43:43AM +0100, Michael Vetter wrote:
> > In the documentation there occurs the typo 'the the' instead of just
> > 'the'.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Can you look at the git log of the project a
taylanbayi...@gmail.com (Taylan Ulrich "Bayırlı/Kammer") writes:
> After some tinkering around I realized that the problem is that our
> workaround of loading files explicitly causes the package record
> type to be redefined after some packages have already been defined.
> More gen
Ricardo Wurmus skribis:
> But how does this relate to snippets? In other build systems snippets
> cause the source archive to be unpacked, modified, and then repacked.
> If we split unpacking and gemspec extraction we’d have to make sure that
> this also works when snippets are involved, i.e. sn
On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 09:43:43AM +0100, Michael Vetter wrote:
> In the documentation there occurs the typo 'the the' instead of just
> 'the'.
Thanks!
Can you look at the git log of the project and submit a revised patch
after making the commit message match the convention? If you search the
git
Ludovic Courtès writes:
>> +(define (latest-release guix-package)
>> + "Return an for the latest release of GUIX-PACKAGE."
>> + (let* ((pkg (specification->package guix-package))
>
> Someone (Ricardo?) proposed recently to pass a package object instead of
> a package name to ‘latest-release’.
In the documentation there occurs the typo 'the the' instead of just
'the'.
Please put me into CC when replying to this mail as I am not subscribed
to this mailing list.
--
Michael>From 365079b1c1e5d28073944ced686a772f1af6256c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Michael Vetter
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016
Roel Janssen writes:
> Thanks again for your time and helpful response. I hope this version of
> the patch is fine.
It is :) Thanks for your patience!
> It is the Boost Software License v1. So I peeked at boost.scm and
> copied that license (license:x11-style ...).
>
> The attached patch sh
Ben Woodcroft writes:
>>> We could even default this to the expected name of the library guessed
>>> from the name of the package when #:import is not given. However, this
>>> would unfortunately break packages that have been written outside of
>>> Guix, so I imagine you don't feel this is a goo
>From 2a07b6ca221a6466d05fcc434331748b80dc3809 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Roel Janssen
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 15:43:50 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add LDC.
* gnu/packages/ldc.scm: New file.
* gnu/packages/patches/ldc-disable-tests.patch: New file.
* gnu-system.am (GNU_SYSTEM_MODULES): Add ldc.
Ben Woodcroft writes:
> On 05/01/16 21:36, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
>> Ben Woodcroft writes:
> [..]
>>> While I managed to install 1.0.1, I wasn't sure how best to remove the
>>> bundled 1.0.0 .gem file. The issue is that when the source is a .gem
>>> file (ie most of the time), the gemspec is tak
On 02/01/16 01:04, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
Ben Woodcroft writes:
On 01/01/16 18:25, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
Alex Kost writes:
Ricardo Wurmus (2015-12-31 12:52 +0300) wrote:
Ben Woodcroft writes:
Do you know though, is there any way to get emacs to insert the extra
space in description s
On 04/01/16 00:06, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
Ben Woodcroft skribis:
On 03/01/16 06:54, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
Ben Woodcroft skribis:
On 02/01/16 04:17, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
Ben Woodcroft skribis:
[...]
+ `(#:phases
+ (modify-phases %standard-phases
+ (replace 'check
On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 5:08 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Federico Beffa skribis:
>
>> What do you think of moving 'broken-tarball-fetch' from
>> gnu/packages/engineering.scm to an utility library?
>
> What about moving it to (guix packages), probably under the name
> ‘url-fetch/tarbomb’ to clarif
On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 10:40 AM, Alex Kost wrote:
> Federico Beffa (2016-01-04 13:18 +0300) wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Jan 2, 2016 at 3:13 PM, Alex Kost wrote:
>>> Federico Beffa (2016-01-01 19:53 +0300) wrote:
> [...]
there's no 'guix-config.el', but only 'guix-config.el.in'. It would be
grea
Efraim Flashner skribis:
> While testing libgpg-errror I happened to build pyton-minimal, which failed
> to pass its tests. Checking in python.scm, python-minimal includes openssl
> so it can pass the _urllib tests (and I'm sure it uses it for something), and
> these are the tests that fail.
Th
On 05/01/16 21:36, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
Ben Woodcroft writes:
[..]
While I managed to install 1.0.1, I wasn't sure how best to remove the
bundled 1.0.0 .gem file. The issue is that when the source is a .gem
file (ie most of the time), the gemspec is taken from the downloaded
.gem file direc
Ben Woodcroft writes:
> I've attached a patch for a simple rubygem. This one was slightly nasty
> because the gem for version 1.0.1 includes the .gem file for version
> 1.0.0, which means that 1.0.0 gets silently installed instead of the
> built and tested 1.0.1 .gem file - it is unlucky that
On 01/05/2016 10:58 AM, Efraim Flashner wrote:
> It already does that with the patch If there's no change then it defaults to
> .tar.gz. Could part of the patch be changed to:
> #:optional (ending ".tar.gz")) ?
That is what I meant. This way we would not need the "(when ..." and
could keep this f
Roel Janssen writes:
> +(define-module (gnu packages ldc)
> + #:use-module ((guix licenses) #:prefix license:)
> + #:use-module (guix packages)
> + #:use-module (guix download)
> + #:use-module (guix build-system cmake)
> + #:use-module (gnu packages)
> + #:use-module (gnu packages base)
>
On Tue, 5 Jan 2016 01:53:40 +0100
Cyril Roelandt wrote:
> On 01/03/2016 10:36 PM, swedebugia wrote:
> > ---
> > guix/build-system/python.scm | 17 -
> > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/guix/build-system/python.scm b/guix/build-system/python.
Federico Beffa (2016-01-04 13:18 +0300) wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 2, 2016 at 3:13 PM, Alex Kost wrote:
>> Federico Beffa (2016-01-01 19:53 +0300) wrote:
[...]
>>> there's no 'guix-config.el', but only 'guix-config.el.in'. It would be
>>> great if you could provide a working patch.
>>
>> Hm, OK, so you
42 matches
Mail list logo
