Mark H Weaver writes:
> Do other people think that such programs belong in Guix?
Okay, it seems that the general feeling is that we should accept these
programs, so I'll go along with that. I guess I should apologize for
making you feel unwelcome. My social skills leave much to be desired.
Any
On 07/30/2015 09:04 AM, Pjotr Prins wrote:
> How about creating a policy that people can refer to?
Well, I'm not sure we want to add any bureaucracy :)
Apart from that, I completely agree with your post, there is no reason
to reject xscreenshot (yet).
Cyril.
Here's a little Nagios-related package. Maybe some day we'll actually
have Nagios proper.
>From 49c6fcbf3ccd6c24f4cf4a4ec73e26df3986f01d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David Thompson
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 15:49:29 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add graphios.
* gnu/packages/python.scm (graphios):
* Mark H Weaver [2015-07-29 19:58]:
> Do other people think that such programs belong in Guix?
I've only gotten 1 package into guix so far, so take my thoughts with a
grain of salt.
I liked the Arch model[0] when I was a dev: core, extra, community +
AUR.[1] The AUR I would credit with a vast am
Fabian Boucsein (2015-07-30 09:33 +0300) wrote:
> Hi Alex,
>
> thanks for yiur answer. The error i get when guix is trying to
> install grub2 is about too many disk label. With devices in mind
> there are three ways to configure grub2. Devices, label and uuids.
> Looking
> at my configuration i am
Mark H Weaver writes:
> Do other people think that such programs belong in Guix?
IMO if it's free software, builds correctly, and doesn't fail at the
execution, It's OK to have them in Guix because even if it's not
maintained or seems useless.
Maybe when Guix will achieve the beta stage and/or
Would it be possible to get a status icon straight from the build
farm, such as Travis CI provides, for Guix builds? That would mean we
could add it to a package README, e.g.
https://github.com/pjotrp/bioruby-vcf/blob/master/README.md
The embedded markdown code snippet looks like
[