Coming late, I have not followed the full discussion closely, so my remark
may be out of tune. I think our descriptions should be formatted as simply
as possible: just plain ascii text, which would work in any locale (or if
you insist, maybe utf8).
So far, I simply avoided lists in package descrip
> Ricardo Wurmus skribis:
>
>> From 57265b8363add56ea0ea2f35310c39db7e2b14ed Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Ricardo Wurmus
>> Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 08:46:44 +0200
>> Subject: [PATCH 1/2] gnu: Add NTK.
>>
>> * gnu/packages/fltk.scm (ntk): New variable.
>
> [...]
>
>> +(license lgpl2.0)))
>
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 12:12:25AM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Simon Josefsson (of GnuTLS, GNU SASL, GNU LibIDN, and many other GNU and
> non-GNU projects) kindly offered us an 8-core x86_64 build machine.
Excellent, thanks a lot, Simon!
Andreas
Hi Guix,
while packaging Extempora I noticed that the portaudio does not seem to
work with JACK. Extempora uses portaudio and it would not create a JACK
port.
After I rebuilt portaudio with “jack-1” rather than “jack-2” Extempora
would create a JACK port via portaudio successfully. “jack-1” had
Pjotr Prins skribis:
> From ce8cfeadc8a661ff0fe0b96dc241d0063ed49ba3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: pjotrp
> Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 15:32:36 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] build: ruby: Add 'gem-flags' key to ruby build system
>
> * guix/build-system/ruby.scm (build): add 'gem-flags' key
> * guix/bui
Ricardo Wurmus skribis:
> From 57265b8363add56ea0ea2f35310c39db7e2b14ed Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Ricardo Wurmus
> Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 08:46:44 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH 1/2] gnu: Add NTK.
>
> * gnu/packages/fltk.scm (ntk): New variable.
[...]
> +(license lgpl2.0)))
Version 2.0-on
"Cook, Malcolm" skribis:
> However
>
> ./pre-inst-env guix package -i hello
>
> Gives me
>
> guix package: error: build failed: the build users group `guix-builder'
> has no members
>
> But, but, I do have a group `guix-builder`
>
> I think the problem may be that my guix-builder gro
"Cook, Malcolm" skribis:
> As you observed, the majority of my problems were due to building guix on a
> network mount having some odd nfs4_facl setting that was making all the files
> be executable, which is explicitly tested against in many tests, and thus
> they were all failing.
>
> Moving
Ludovic Courtès (2015-07-18 00:30 +0300) wrote:
> Alex Kost skribis:
>
>> So I'm attaching 2 patches: for lines with leading parenthesis and for
>> fixing multiple "typos" (in a general meaning). Changing
>> synopses/descriptions according to "guix lint" (so no problems with
>> 'gnu-description'
Ludovic Courtès (2015-07-18 00:24 +0300) wrote:
> Alex Kost skribis:
>
>> Ludovic Courtès (2015-07-16 22:08 +0300) wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>> Since we have our own conventions that are not necessarily coincide with
>> the upstream conventions, I believe it would be better to prefer our
>> synopses/des
> I hope to chime in further with a big WOOHOO once I have this configuration
> working
Not quite WOOHOO yet. Getting close Here is where I am:
I have built guix-0.8.2 on centOS7 passing all checks
However
./pre-inst-env guix package -i hello
Gives me
guix package: e
Ricardo Wurmus writes:
> From 9243823abad3943bd3f4ebe4f6d18cc53c2143e0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Ricardo Wurmus
> Date: Thu, 21 May 2015 15:24:11 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: python-ipython: Add optional dependencies.
>
> * gnu/packages/python.scm (python-ipython)[inputs]: Add optional d
Alex Kost writes:
> ... If people agree on this,
> what about the attached patch?
Does it install the documentation info file? If so, just push it.
Thanks,
Fede
>
>
> From 35e622f13b5971ffab154da2ed316c2076c0c652 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Alex Kost
> Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2015 11:48:12 +03
On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 05:51:01PM +1000, Ben Woodcroft wrote:
On 24/06/15 22:09, Mark H Weaver wrote:
>However, there's a bigger problem here. Some of the code is not clearly
>licensed or has invalid copyright notices:
>
>* The copyright notice on kstring.h lacks copyrigh
On 24/06/15 22:09, Mark H Weaver wrote:
However, there's a bigger problem here. Some of the code is not clearly
licensed or has invalid copyright notices:
* The copyright notice on kstring.h lacks copyright dates.
* The copyright dates in seqtk.c and LICENSE are incorrect
("20082-2012").
*
On 12/07/15 21:02, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
Hi Ben,
in addition to Mark’s comments
Thanks Mark, Ricardo, attached. I wasn't sure whether it was better to
have a different phase for fix-includes and fixing the README, can
combine desired?
>From f7e3b6e9c5e84423c9be5dac1857289d6866bd0e Mon Sep 17 0
16 matches
Mail list logo
