Another patch attached, with the only difference being the brackets not
on a new line.
On 21/06/15 14:41, Mark H Weaver wrote:
Is there any reason to build the single-threaded version? Maybe it
would be better to omit it, and call the multi-threaded version
FastTree. What do you think?
I cons
Ben Woodcroft writes:
> Updated patch attached.
Much better, thanks!
> In answer to my own question
>> During development of this patch I noticed badly specified system*
> does not throw an error - is there a way to do this so?
>
> One way is to replace system* with (zero? (system* with that be
Hello Guix,
These patches add totem, a.k.a. GNOME Videos, and its prerequisites
grilo and grilo-plugins. This patch set also depends on the 'clutter'
and 'gom' patch sets which I posted recently.
A few caveats: in order for totem to work properly, you must have
several other packages installed i
This patch adds 'gom', a prerequisite for proper functioning of totem.
Mark
>From 3a095ad57dacaf0e369a70f0241a9f25698e1a0f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mark H Weaver
Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2015 23:39:18 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add gom.
* gnu/packages/gnome.scm (gom): New variable.
---
g
Hello Guix,
These patches add clutter and related libraries. It is a prerequisite
for totem a.k.a. GNOME Videos, which I will be sending in a followup
email. Comments and suggestions welcome.
Mark
>From 888a56ec560bf8e623e37a238006cce4fe5a369c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mark H Weave
On 21/06/15 03:17, Mark H Weaver wrote:
Hi Ben,
Instead of using 'trivial-build-system' for this, it would be better to
use 'gnu-build-system' and remove/replace the phases that aren't
appropriate. So, you'll probably want to remove the 'configure' phase
and replace the 'build' and 'install' ph
On 2015-06-19 17:32, Christopher Allan Webber wrote:
Amirouche Boubekki writes:
Héllo,
If I'm not mistaken this patch relies only on the presence of
requirements.txt. This is not a required file in python packaging.
otherwise said, we miss a lot using this method. I think the best way
to
do
Hi Ben,
Instead of using 'trivial-build-system' for this, it would be better to
use 'gnu-build-system' and remove/replace the phases that aren't
appropriate. So, you'll probably want to remove the 'configure' phase
and replace the 'build' and 'install' phases.
Even so, there are many important p
Sorry my patch was missing a file.
On 2015-06-20 18:45, Amirouche Boubekki wrote:
This is a first patch to request the interest and the feedback of the
community to have something like that in guix and how it should be
done.
guix packacge --dependencies=PACKAGE
That will output the dot progra
This is a first patch to request the interest and the feedback of the
community to have something like that in guix and how it should be done.
guix packacge --dependencies=PACKAGE
That will output the dot program required to generate a graph with
graphviz.
The full bash line can be:
guix
Ludovic Courtès (2015-06-19 11:26 +0300) wrote:
> Alex Kost skribis:
[...]
>> I agree, getting an error is better than a broken link, so I'm for
>> making (#:recursive? #f) a default. And resolving symlinks would
>> probably be even better.
>
> Done in commits 020f3e4 and 7833db1.
I see, thank
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> [...]
>
>> I'd like to try re-package qt5 with submodules, and drop QtWebEngine.
>> As same as Debian and NixOS did.
>
> And Fedora. Ricardo found this insightful discussion:
>
> http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/2015-February/019960.html
>
> +1 for re
12 matches
Mail list logo
