Mark H Weaver writes:
> 宋文武 writes:
>
>> * gnu/packages/xml.scm (libxml2)[native-inputs]: Remove python.
>> [arguments]: Remove.
>> (python-libxml2, python2-libxml): New variables.
>> ---
>> gnu/packages/xml.scm | 53
>> ++--
>> 1 file change
Mark H Weaver writes:
> 宋文武 writes:
>> * gnu/packages/xml.scm (libxml2): Update to 2.9.2.
>
> Looks good, but this is probably for core-updates, since it will entail
> recompiling at least 1/3 of our packages (as estimated by 'guix refresh
> -l'), and possibly much more since gtk+ depends on lib
On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 05:57:23PM -0400, Thompson, David wrote:
> > that essentially replaces the old rvm or rbenv! So much better :)
>
> Oh, wow! Maybe you can help me because I tried to use Guix to replace
> rvm/rbenv at work and I failed miserably. Native extensions failed to
> build success
On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 5:02 PM, Pjotr Prins wrote:
> I ran bundler with success using the latest ruby patch :). It requires
> a tweak to the environment so the GEM_PATH points at
>
> $HOME/.guix-profile/lib/ruby/gems/2.2.0/
>
> The script I use to run Ruby is at
>
> https://github.com/pjotrp/
I ran bundler with success using the latest ruby patch :). It requires
a tweak to the environment so the GEM_PATH points at
$HOME/.guix-profile/lib/ruby/gems/2.2.0/
The script I use to run Ruby is at
https://github.com/pjotrp/guix-notes/blob/master/scripts/ruby-guix-env
that essentially rep
Hello,
after receiving my novena, I finally installed guix by the tarball on it.
This part went very smoothly. Then I tried
guix build hello
and gcc, guile and so on were built correctly. But tar failed its tests:
25: terminal input FAILED (iotty.at:29)
ERRO
I was working on a new package and found that I was very surprised that
suddenly guix told me that "guix package" did not exist:
cwebber@earlgrey:~/devel/guix$ guix package --help
guix: package: command not found
Try `guix --help' for more information.
Wh?
So I dug into the source and
Ludovic Courtès (2015-02-26 02:05 +0300) wrote:
> Alex Kost skribis:
>
>> Suppose a user specifies "--no-substitutes" in his GUIX_BUILD_OPTIONS
>> and then he calls "guix system reconfigure". What would happen?
>> Substitutes _will be used_ anyway, because:
>> ‘(parse-options-from args)’ will co
宋文武 writes:
> * gnu/packages/xml.scm (libxml2)[native-inputs]: Remove python.
> [arguments]: Remove.
> (python-libxml2, python2-libxml): New variables.
> ---
> gnu/packages/xml.scm | 53
> ++--
> 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 22 deletions(
宋文武 writes:
> * gnu/packages/xml.scm (libxml2): Update to 2.9.2.
Looks good, but this is probably for core-updates, since it will entail
recompiling at least 1/3 of our packages (as estimated by 'guix refresh
-l'), and possibly much more since gtk+ depends on libxml2 and is an
implicit input to p
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Mathieu Lirzin skribis:
>>
>> This statement should definitely complement the documentation in HACKING.
>
> Where/how would you suggest adding it?
When reacting, I didn't realize that most of your statement is actually
documented in the recent "Running Gu
* gnu/packages/xml.scm (libxml2)[native-inputs]: Remove python.
[arguments]: Remove.
(python-libxml2, python2-libxml): New variables.
---
gnu/packages/xml.scm | 53 ++--
1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gnu/packages
* gnu/packages/xml.scm (libxml2): Update to 2.9.2.
---
gnu/packages/xml.scm | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/xml.scm b/gnu/packages/xml.scm
index 8a4d2fb..a4c81b2 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/xml.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/xml.scm
@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
;;;
13 matches
Mail list logo
