l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>> +@item @code{imported-modules} (default: @code{'()})
>
> The list of Guile modules to import in the patch derivation, for use
> by the @code{snippet}.
I don't understand how this differs from `modules'?
> Could you send an updated patch?
Here it is. Th
宋文武 skribis:
> And how about use specification instead of package, so I can:
>
> (manifest
> (map package-specification->manifest-entry
> '("emacs"
>"font-adobe-source-han-sans:cn")))
Sure, with:
(use-modules (gnu) (guix profiles))
(define package-specification->
Daniel Pimentel skribis:
> First, site: I like the new Guix website. It's beautiful design, so if
> you put a carrousel effect in screenshot pictures, maybe have more
> beautiful.
Personally I’m happier without a carousel. :-)
> In documentation, there isn't command like "ifconfig eno1 up" for
Alex Vorobiev skribis:
> Thanks! I pulled the master from git and rebuilt/reinstalled guix. Now I
> don't see that error! But I do see another one:
>
> $ guix package -i bash
> looking for the latest release of GNU bash...FTP to `ftp.gnu.org' failed:
> 530: User access denied.
This is annoying
taylanbayi...@gmail.com (Taylan Ulrich "Bayırlı/Kammer") skribis:
> From 948fcdbb0cea1b8fcd7907554c61633db2f54dd8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: =?UTF-8?q?Taylan=20Ulrich=20Bay=C4=B1rl=C4=B1/Kammer?=
>
> Date: Fri, 15 May 2015 21:54:11 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] doc: Add "package Reference" and
Hello,
Thanks for the update, it all seems to be on track!
Hopefully the availability of the glibc-hurd tarball allow the code to
be simplified, and the Hurd-specific parts of the glibc recipes to be
reduced.
> I was thinking about following Mark's suggestion of having a generic
> glibc package
Hello,
the attached patch adds a dependency of libreoffice with a build system
of its own. Since there is no check target, I have not tried whether the
resulting binary actually works as needed by libreoffice. We will see...
Comments are welcome.
Andreas
* gnu/packages/maths.scm (lpsolve): New
Andreas Enge skribis:
> On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 07:14:04PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> > - The tarball also contains /, /root and /var. When unpacking it, the owner
>> > and permissions are changed on the system.
>> No. Maybe we can fix it by using two tar invocations with different
>> --
taylanbayi...@gmail.com (Taylan Ulrich "Bayırlı/Kammer") skribis:
> Additionally, it's a best-practice to disable password-authentication
> for the root account in sshd_config (Debian 8 proposes it at least) to
> prevent the chance of successful brute-force/dictionary attacks.
I think the default
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> David Thompson skribis:
>
>> Lately I've been wanting to version control the list of packages that I
>> install in my user profile so that I can sync it amongst many machines.
>> So, I took a stab at adding a new '--apply' option to 'guix package'
>> that reads in a pac
David Thompson skribis:
> Lately I've been wanting to version control the list of packages that I
> install in my user profile so that I can sync it amongst many machines.
> So, I took a stab at adding a new '--apply' option to 'guix package'
> that reads in a package list from a Scheme file and
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 10:17:14PM +0300, Manolis Ragkousis wrote:
> 5) Tomorrow if not today I will have ready the bootstrap-tarballs.
That sounds great, keep us updated when it happens!
Andreas
12 matches
Mail list logo
