The D programming language compiler has been called dmd since about 2000 or so.
In order to avoid confusion, may I request that the Gnu dmd ("Daemons-managing
Daemon") change its acronym?
Thanks,
-Walter
Hello,
Ludovic Courtès writes:
>> I wasn't sure whether I should put it in another file (it's a tiny
>> package).
>
> Similar tools (like ‘dfc’) ended up into admin.scm, though it’s not
> perfectly right. I think we need a module for “this kind of tool,” but
> I’m not sure what to call it. Idea
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Could you write a few lines on this to add to the GSoC ideas page?
How is this?
Linux container support
GNU Guix currently supports the installation of GuixSD on virtual
machines and physical hosts. The goal of this project would be to
add another installation
This actually adds three packages but they're closely tied together.
>From 5e10d1af45eceff13d764e6b13cc3498477b080d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Taylan=20Ulrich=20Bay=C4=B1rl=C4=B1/Kammer?=
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2015 22:35:53 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 4/5] gnu: Add quvi.
* gnu/packages/web.s
(This relies on my previous two patches adding encoding.scm with Enca.)
>From 2e727c984c327bd033c910a7b51eadfd46210296 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Taylan=20Ulrich=20Bay=C4=B1rl=C4=B1/Kammer?=
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2015 22:37:08 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 3/5] gnu: Add libass.
* gnu/packages/
Is it fine to put these in a new file called encoding.scm?
In the first one, I couldn't figure out how to make the test suite run,
which uses a setup.py file to compile a small program, which fails with
"ld: cannot find -lrecode" (where recode is the library being tested).
Any help welcome.
>From
Hello GNUnetters!
Last year we submitted that project idea entitled “Supporting binary
package distribution through GNUnet”:
http://www.gnu.org/software/soc-projects/ideas-2014.html#guix
It’s GSoC time again, so I was pondering whether we should put it on
display again.
I actually wonder if t
Alex Sassmannshausen skribis:
> You should find attached a patch which adds "tree" to guix — thus
> meaning I finally contribute my first package! \o/
Yay! :-)
> I wasn't sure whether I should put it in another file (it's a tiny
> package).
Similar tools (like ‘dfc’) ended up into admin.scm,
Ricardo Wurmus skribis:
> Ludovic Courtès writes:
>
>> Ricardo Wurmus skribis:
>>
>>> The other two patches update the packages for Ant and R, such that they
>>> depend on the "jdk" output.
>>
>> Merge these into one patch, since doing it separately would mean that in
>> the interim R and Ant wo
Paul van der Walt skribis:
> On 2015-03-04 at 20:04, quoth Andreas Enge:
>> On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 08:01:17PM +0100, Paul van der Walt wrote:
>>> I propose putting djvulibre into a separate file, djvulibre.scm
>>
>> Could it go into ebook.scm?
>
> I had just realised Ludo suggested djvu.scm, so
Hello,
You should find attached a patch which adds "tree" to guix — thus
meaning I finally contribute my first package! \o/
I wasn't sure whether I should put it in another file (it's a tiny
package).
Let me know if you find anything amiss.
Cheers,
Alex
signature.asc
Description: PGP signatu
On 2015-03-04 at 20:04, quoth Andreas Enge:
> On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 08:01:17PM +0100, Paul van der Walt wrote:
>> I propose putting djvulibre into a separate file, djvulibre.scm
>
> Could it go into ebook.scm?
I had just realised Ludo suggested djvu.scm, so i was modifying that,
but ebook is al
On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 08:01:17PM +0100, Paul van der Walt wrote:
> I propose putting djvulibre into a separate file, djvulibre.scm
Could it go into ebook.scm?
Andreas
Hello Guix,
I propose putting djvulibre into a separate file, djvulibre.scm, as
shown in the patch. If everyone thinks this is okay, i'll push it, along
with the other (zathura*) patches posted earlier -- after double reviews
i believe they are now acceptable.
Thank you for your patience with me!
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) skribis:
> Unless someone objects, I’ll move ‘which’ to (gnu packages base) Real Soon.
Done in ce0614d.
If you have pending patches, please double-check.
Ludo’.
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Ricardo Wurmus skribis:
>
>> The other two patches update the packages for Ant and R, such that they
>> depend on the "jdk" output.
>
> Merge these into one patch, since doing it separately would mean that in
> the interim R and Ant would be left broken.
I merged the t
Hi Guix!
This mail is to say hi to everyone and introduce myself. I'm Rohan, a
final-year CS undergraduate at IIT Bombay.
The project I'm interested in working on for GNU GSoC this year is to
implement a DHCP client library in Guile. The end result, as I discussed
with Ludovic, would be a package
Done!
At the moment most packages are built for x86_64; i686 is a bit behind
and mips64el is a lot behind.
Ludo’.
Ricardo Wurmus skribis:
> I just noticed that the file does not import the pkg-config module.
> I did not see this before and thus added the BOOST_LIB variable to the
> qmake invocation. This likely won't be necessary when pkg-config is
> actually used.
>
> I'll fix this in an updated patch.
Oh
Ricardo Wurmus skribis:
> From 874285b37143f049c1714f783ef246f33eb072c1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Ricardo Wurmus
> Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2015 09:16:57 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH 1/2] gnu: Add muparser.
>
> * gnu/packages/maths.scm (muparser): New variable.
LGTM.
> From 9868dc327a649bcf712f9115b
Ricardo Wurmus skribis:
> PyGtk comes with the deprecated pygtk-codegen-2.0 which only wraps
> pygobject-codegen-2.0. The attached patch fixes the prefix to this
> executable from the pygtk prefix to the pygobject package output.
>
> ~~ Ricardo
>
> From 01012ecefda0842d59d1031991ddf5ea6bb75080 M
Ricardo Wurmus skribis:
> The first attached patch splits the outputs of the icedtea6 package into
> "doc", "jdk", and "out", containing the documentation, the contents of
> the "j2sdk-image" directory, and the contents of the "j2re-image"
> directory, respectively.
>
> The other two patches upda
I just noticed that the file does not import the pkg-config module.
I did not see this before and thus added the BOOST_LIB variable to the
qmake invocation. This likely won't be necessary when pkg-config is
actually used.
I'll fix this in an updated patch.
~~ Ricardo
>From 874285b37143f049c1714f783ef246f33eb072c1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ricardo Wurmus
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2015 09:16:57 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] gnu: Add muparser.
* gnu/packages/maths.scm (muparser): New variable.
---
gnu/packages/maths.scm | 26 ++
1 file changed,
Ricardo Wurmus writes:
>> The problem here is that the library is not installed to /lib, but to
>> /lib64 or /libmips64. I'll see if I can coerce it to install the
>> library to /lib on all platforms.
>
> zita-alsa-pcmi has the very same problem. I'll take care of both of
> them.
Attached are
Hi Guix,
when I originally packaged up OpenJDK with IcedTea it did not occur to
me that the build output in openjdk.build contained multiple
distributions of the JDK and JRE in addition to various binaries and
libraries.
What really matters are these distribution directories named
"j2re-image", "
taylanbayi...@gmail.com (Taylan Ulrich "Bayırlı/Kammer") skribis:
> l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>
>> I actually agree. Well, next round?
>
> If you want. :-) I thought it might be too much to have a second commit
> that touches all recipes where 'modify-phases' is used, but maybe I'm
>
taylanbayi...@gmail.com (Taylan Ulrich "Bayırlı/Kammer") skribis:
> l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
[...]
>> If Audacity uses Autoconf and pkg.m4, I guess you could just pass
>> PKG_CONFIG=true as a configure flag, or {LIBID3TAG,LIBMAD}_{CFLAGS,LIBS}
>> and it will just work.
>
> The latt
28 matches
Mail list logo
