>From 884f130063e9d17dfd1030eba4a23f4976cc60d7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David Thompson
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 22:13:30 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] gnu: node: Update to 0.12.0.
* gnu/packages/node.scm (node): Update to 0.12.0.
---
gnu/packages/node.scm | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(
>From 3b0d69b8a5f688e595583681990257ff2fa0c954 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David Thompson
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 22:04:35 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] gnu: ruby: Update to 2.2.0.
* gnu/packages/ruby.scm (ruby): Update to 2.2.0.
---
gnu/packages/ruby.scm | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
El mié, 11-02-2015 a las 22:23 +0100, Ludovic Courtès escribió:
> Luis Felipe López Acevedo skribis:
>
> > What worries me about staying close to the GNU branding is that it could
> > create the confusion RMS wants to avoid (people thinking that GuixSD is
> > *the* GNU OS and GNU's head its logo)
taylanbayi...@gmail.com (Taylan Ulrich "Bayırlı/Kammer") writes:
> The license declaration of this recipe is noteworthy. I diligently
> commented about the places each license appears in, from the non-LGPL2
> places mentioned in the "Copyright" file, so as to make it easier to
> verify nothing ha
The license declaration of this recipe is noteworthy. I diligently
commented about the places each license appears in, from the non-LGPL2
places mentioned in the "Copyright" file, so as to make it easier to
verify nothing has been left out. Tell me if I overdid it; I couldn't
see a better way to
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> In the future, could you use separate email threads, à la ‘git
> send-email’? That makes more reasonably sized bites. :-)
Sorry about that. I'll remember to chunk 'em a little more nicely in
the future.
>> From a13f49d293eebf5d6de5170a4dfc0b9885a90c26 Mon Sep 17 00:
Alex Kost skribis:
> From 8a9ee48b755ad6b635ebba408fcc63653db91edd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Alex Kost
> Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 22:20:00 +0300
> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add xosd.
>
> * gnu/packages/xdisorg.scm (xosd): New variable.
LGTM, thanks Alex!
Ludo’.
宋文武 skribis:
> * gnu/packages/xml.scm (libxml2): Move zlib to 'propagated-inputs'.
Did you encounter an issue in practice? It’s only a problem for static
linking.
I’m asking partly because 452 packages would need to be rebuilt.
Ludo’.
宋文武 skribis:
> * gnu/packages/gnutls.scm (gnutls): Move which to 'native-inputs'.
> Comment on 'propagated-inputs'.
LGTM, although it would have been nicer to make this change as part of
the recent wip-gnutls batch to minimize rebuilds/disruption.
Thanks,
Ludo’.
Ricardo Wurmus skribis:
> I wrote the author an email to ask whether this can be fixed upstream
> for other architectures than x86_64. Until then should I just declare
> x86_64 as the only supported architecture?
Probably yes, with a comment pointing to this discussion and possibly
the one with
All 5 look good to me.
Thanks,
Ludo’.
Ricardo Wurmus skribis:
> Ludovic Courtès writes:
>>> From 3bb3b7346f44f8e4849efc7a5fc8b465a974d625 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>>> From: rekado
>>> Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 10:12:00 +0100
>>> Subject: [PATCH 4/4] gnu: Add LV2.
>>>
>>> * gnu/packages/audio.scm (lv2): New variable.
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>>
Hi Guix,
Attached is a patch to add the LV2 toolkit, a C++ library.
~~ Ricardo
>From b89cc322bbc2ebd0faa361f5b1c1ffccb7b40688 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ricardo Wurmus
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 21:11:53 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add lvtk.
* gnu/packages/audio.scm (lvtk): New variable.
---
Luis Felipe López Acevedo skribis:
> What worries me about staying close to the GNU branding is that it could
> create the confusion RMS wants to avoid (people thinking that GuixSD is
> *the* GNU OS and GNU's head its logo). He even suggested having a logo
> for Guix and GuixSD [1][2]. So I think
Andreas Enge skribis:
> The code of glibc states
> ;; Installing a locale archive with all the locales is to
> ;; expensive (~100 MiB), so we rely on users to install the
> ;; locales they really want.
> But how do I do that? I wondered if there was an addition
>From 8a9ee48b755ad6b635ebba408fcc63653db91edd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alex Kost
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 22:20:00 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add xosd.
* gnu/packages/xdisorg.scm (xosd): New variable.
---
gnu/packages/xdisorg.scm | 30 +-
1 file changed, 29 inse
Followed Ludovic's suggestions and pushed to wip-hurd.
Thanks Marek.
Manolis
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 05:14:13PM +0100, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
> A recurring error is apparently related to embedded assembly
> instructions:
> I wrote the author an email to ask whether this can be fixed upstream
> for other architectures than x86_64. Until then should I just declare
> x86_64 as
Andreas Enge writes:
> the package fails to build on i686:
>http://hydra.gnu.org/build/247325
> Could you maybe have a look?
Thanks for notifying me.
A recurring error is apparently related to embedded assembly
instructions:
~
...
bt2_idx.h: Assembler messages:
bt2_idx.h:489: Error: in
Hi Guix,
attached is a patch for BEDOPS.
The build process for this application is a bit messy because the
sources include tarballs of modified upstream libraries (jansson, bzip2,
zlib), so we cannot just swap them out for system libraries.
I'm in touch with the developers to see if we can get a
* gnu/packages/xml.scm (libxml2): Move zlib to 'propagated-inputs'.
---
gnu/packages/xml.scm | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/xml.scm b/gnu/packages/xml.scm
index f2b3baa..173435d 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/xml.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/xml.scm
@@ -65,7
* gnu/packages/gnutls.scm (gnutls): Move which to 'native-inputs'.
Comment on 'propagated-inputs'.
---
gnu/packages/gnutls.scm | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/gnutls.scm b/gnu/packages/gnutls.scm
index a51d948..b256a97 100644
--- a/gnu/packag
Hello,
the package fails to build on i686:
http://hydra.gnu.org/build/247325
Could you maybe have a look?
Andreas
Sorry for the delay.
In the future, could you use separate email threads, à la ‘git
send-email’? That makes more reasonably sized bites. :-)
Ricardo Wurmus skribis:
> From cae7a61f645ff5b5e8458f5b3bcd0d6029e43b22 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Ricardo Wurmus
> Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 23:11:
Hi Ricardo, Ludo, and Andreas,
thank you for your feedback. Things really looked scarier to me before
we had this conversation. I'm still insecure about some things - what
about D-Bus, which some programs also expect to be in a certain
place? - but since both the Jack and Xfce packages use it alre
25 matches
Mail list logo