Re: wip-gobject-introspection

2015-01-25 Thread Mark H Weaver
Mark H Weaver writes: > Federico Beffa writes: >> I think that the wip-gobject-introspection branch is ready for >> integration into master. > > Sounds good to me. Ludovic? I went ahead and merged this to master. Mark

Re: New year, new name²

2015-01-25 Thread Daniel Pimentel
On 2015-01-22 14:30, l...@gnu.org wrote: It is my pleasure to announce the new new name to designate the standalone distro: the Guix System Distribution, or GNU GSD. I will update the web page and manual accordingly. For those who haven’t followed, the discussion is at

Re: Netpbm

2015-01-25 Thread Daniel Pimentel
On 2015-01-25 18:01, Andreas Enge wrote: I just went back to our previous netpbm version, as the newest one fails one test. Apparently I committed a change instead of stashing it, so I did not test it correctly locally. Sorry for the mess! Andreas Netpbm work now :) Thanks, -- Daniel Pimentel

Re: wip-gobject-introspection

2015-01-25 Thread Mark H Weaver
Federico Beffa writes: > I think that the wip-gobject-introspection branch is ready for > integration into master. Sounds good to me. Ludovic? Mark

Re: 0.8.1 release schedule

2015-01-25 Thread Andreas Enge
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 12:06:08AM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > For a while I contemplated the idea of releasing 0.8.1 before FOSDEM, > but at this point it wouldn’t allow enough testing, I guess. So that > would have to be done the week after. > > Thoughts? It would be nice to have a new rel

0.8.1 release schedule

2015-01-25 Thread Ludovic Courtès
For a while I contemplated the idea of releasing 0.8.1 before FOSDEM, but at this point it wouldn’t allow enough testing, I guess. So that would have to be done the week after. One last thing I wanted to add is an (optional) Xfce session. It seems I’m almost done, but not quite. Thoughts? Ludo

Netpbm

2015-01-25 Thread Andreas Enge
I just went back to our previous netpbm version, as the newest one fails one test. Apparently I committed a change instead of stashing it, so I did not test it correctly locally. Sorry for the mess! Andreas

[PATCH] gnu: Add sxiv.

2015-01-25 Thread Alex Kost
Hello. The patch for another image viewer is attached. >From aacd203f66b9381bbc1fa9756460890c21df5c88 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Alex Kost Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2015 21:09:39 +0300 Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add sxiv. * gnu/packages/sxiv.scm: New file. * gnu-system.am (GNU_SYSTEM_MODULES): Add it. -

Re: guix.el works out of the box

2015-01-25 Thread Alex Kost
Ludovic Courtès (2015-01-23 01:52 +0300) wrote: > With commit 0a05176, which creates a simple site-start.el and sets > EMACSLOADPATH appropriately, users are able to fire Emacs and from there > guix.el works out-of-the-box, using the .el and .scm files available in > /run/current-system/profile. >

Re: wip-gobject-introspection

2015-01-25 Thread Federico Beffa
I think that the wip-gobject-introspection branch is ready for integration into master. WDYT? Fede

Re: A couple roadblocks using guix

2015-01-25 Thread Ludovic Courtès
(Cc: guix-devel.) Omar Radwan skribis: > >Doesn’t allow you to use Python? Could you copy/paste the actual > >session so we have a shared understanding of what’s happening? > > Oops, that was a mistake, nevermind it works, but you can't just type > "python" it has to be "python3" R

Re: [PATCHv2] lint: add 'source' checker.

2015-01-25 Thread Cyril Roelandt
On 01/23/2015 10:56 AM, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) skribis: > >> OK to push with these changes, thank you! > > Ping! :-) > Done in 17a7b75c0f727cd7c32b156d8a9235a2009a248f . Cyril.

Re: A couple roadblocks using guix

2015-01-25 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Omar Radwan skribis: > Also, "guix package -i python" as user & root doesn't allow me to use it. Doesn’t allow you to use Python? Could you copy/paste the actual session so we have a shared understanding of what’s happening? Thanks in advance, Ludo’.

Re: KDE

2015-01-25 Thread Andreas Enge
On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 09:50:45PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > This looks like three variables that could be handled with search path > specifications on the Qt package, no? Yes, that is why I wrote to the list, just in case someone else notices similar needs in a package depending on Qt. I ju