Re: [PATCH] gnu: kde: Add kdelibs.

2015-01-02 Thread 宋文武
> Andreas Enge skribis: > >> RUNPATH >> /gnu/store/7c30kyzagk84inhnb2nbxcmnh76xgh6c-ktouch-4.14.2/lib:/gnu/store/4k20pkxgvfc22wpcvh6xr26ma4b619ad-glibc-2.20/lib:/gnu/store/k7w7wdpvaqlkwq0ijz9149pqn3lq8a5n-gcc-4.8.3-lib/lib64:/gnu/store/k7w7wdpvaqlkwq0ijz9149pqn3lq8a5n-gcc-4.8.3-lib

Re: TODO: user-environment-hook

2015-01-02 Thread 宋文武
Ludovic Courtès writes: > 宋文武 skribis: > >> Currently, (guix profiles) has code to build 'info-dir' for packages in >> profile. >> As mentioned in TODO, IIUC, we should move the code to 'texinfo'. > > Yes, that’s the initial idea. However, it’s not clear that attaching > “user environment hook

[PATCH 1/2] gnu: qt: Update to 5.4.0.

2015-01-02 Thread 宋文武
* gnu/packages/qt.scm (qt): Update to 5.4.0. [origin]: Add snippet. --- gnu/packages/qt.scm | 16 +--- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/gnu/packages/qt.scm b/gnu/packages/qt.scm index 30b772d..42df933 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/qt.scm +++ b/gnu/packages/q

[PATCH 2/2] gnu: qt: Add more inputs.

2015-01-02 Thread 宋文武
* gnu/packages/qt.scm (qt): Add inputs libxcomposite, libxml2, libxslt, mtdev, pcre, eudev. Add native-inputs bison, flex, gperf, python-2, ruby. --- gnu/packages/qt.scm | 24 +++- 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/gnu/packages/qt.scm b/gnu/packa

Re: [PATCH] lint: add 'source' checker.

2015-01-02 Thread Cyril Roelandt
On 12/29/2014 03:23 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Cyril Roelandt skribis: > >> * guix/scripts/lint.scm (uri-available?): New procedure. >> (%checkers): Add 'home-page' checker > > Some comments in addition to what David already wrote. > >> +(define (uri-available? uri) >> + "Return #t if the

Re: wip-armhf branch ready for wider testing

2015-01-02 Thread David Thompson
Mark H Weaver writes: > I'm pleased to announce that the 'wip-armhf' branch is now ready for > wider testing. > [...] > Most likely we'll find more build problems higher up in the stack, and > help with that would be most appreciated! Wow, great progress! I will start testing when my Novena arr

wip-armhf branch ready for wider testing

2015-01-02 Thread Mark H Weaver
Hello Guix! I'm pleased to announce that the 'wip-armhf' branch is now ready for wider testing. So far, I've successfully used this branch to: (1) cross-compile armhf-linux bootstrap tarballs on my Libreboot X60, (2) natively compile armhf bootstrap tarballs on my Novena, based on the cross

Re: Preliminary 'wip-armhf' branch pushed

2015-01-02 Thread Mark H Weaver
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > Mark H Weaver skribis: > >> I don't think we need a 'system' for every combination of flags. We >> should just find a small number of "sweet spots" in the tradeoff between >> minimum requirements vs performance. IMO, for 32-bit ARM, two systems >> should

Re: [PATCH] gnu: minetest: Update to 0.4.11.

2015-01-02 Thread Ludovic Courtès
David Thompson skribis: > From a240e539a9bff664f020a65bf84f45c3c6cc954d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: David Thompson > Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2015 10:28:47 -0500 > Subject: [PATCH] gnu: minetest: Update to 0.4.11. > > * gnu/packages/patches/minetest-subgame-env-var.patch: Delete. > * gnu-system.am

Re: TODO: user-environment-hook

2015-01-02 Thread Ludovic Courtès
宋文武 skribis: > Currently, (guix profiles) has code to build 'info-dir' for packages in > profile. > As mentioned in TODO, IIUC, we should move the code to 'texinfo'. Yes, that’s the initial idea. However, it’s not clear that attaching “user environment hooks” to packages is the right thing. F

Re: [PATCH 2/2] gnu: icon-naming-utils: Wrap with PERL5LIB to find XML::Simple.

2015-01-02 Thread Ludovic Courtès
宋文武 skribis: > Fixes . > > * gnu/packages/gnome.scm (icon-naming-utils)[arguments]: New field. LGTM, thanks! Ludo’.

Re: [PATCH 1/2] gnu: perl-xml-simple: Propagate XML::Parser.

2015-01-02 Thread Ludovic Courtès
宋文武 skribis: > * gnu/packages/xml.scm (perl-xml-simple): Move XML::Parser from 'inputs' > to 'propagated-inputs'. OK, thanks! Ludo'.

Re: guix pull fails for me

2015-01-02 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Adam Pribyl skribis: > Both > guix --version > guix (GNU Guix) 0.7 This looks like an instance of . Long story short: prior to 0.8, ‘guix pull’ would fail to handle changes in the way Guix needs to be built, such as the addition of a dependenc

Re: Problem with natively-built armhf bootstrap compiler

2015-01-02 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Mark H Weaver skribis: > Mark H Weaver writes: > >> I was able to natively build bootstrap tarballs on the Novena. However, >> the compiler in these new bootstrap tarballs is broken. The problem is >> that the new compiler driver (gcc) passes -lgcc_s when linking, but >> libgcc_s.so does not e

Re: Preliminary 'wip-armhf' branch pushed

2015-01-02 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Mark H Weaver skribis: > I don't think we need a 'system' for every combination of flags. We > should just find a small number of "sweet spots" in the tradeoff between > minimum requirements vs performance. IMO, for 32-bit ARM, two systems > should be enough: armhf, and maybe another one (armel

Re: Preliminary 'wip-armhf' branch pushed

2015-01-02 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Mark H Weaver skribis: > I've pushed a new branch 'wip-armhf' (not to be confused with 'wip-arm') > which seems likely to finish natively building bootstrap tarballs soon. > It is based on the 'core-updates' branch. Cool! > I chose system name "armhf-linux", GNU triplet "arm-linux-gnueabihf", >

[PATCH] gnu: minetest: Update to 0.4.11.

2015-01-02 Thread David Thompson
>From a240e539a9bff664f020a65bf84f45c3c6cc954d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: David Thompson Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2015 10:28:47 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] gnu: minetest: Update to 0.4.11. * gnu/packages/patches/minetest-subgame-env-var.patch: Delete. * gnu-system.am (dist_patch_DATA): Remove patch. * gnu

Re: guix pull fails for me

2015-01-02 Thread Amirouche Boubekki
2015-01-01 19:41 GMT+01:00 Adam Pribyl : > On Thu, 1 Jan 2015, Amirouche Boubekki wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> guile-json is missing for some reason. Maybe you can install it > > > Installing guile-json as root makes no difference. > >> manually or from a guix git checkout. I'm curious can you provide the