Federico Beffa writes:
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 7:33 PM, Mark H Weaver wrote:
>> It's not uncommon for some tests to fail occasionally in certain
>> packages. Reasons I've seen include: timeouts set too short, race
>> conditions, randomized tests that fail for some values, and dependencies
>>
Thank you so much for this! I have tried and failed to package nginx a
couple of times now. Glad that I won't have to try a third time.
The patch looks solid to me.
--
David Thompson
Web Developer - Free Software Foundation - http://fsf.org
GPG Key: 0FF1D807
Support the FSF: https://fsf.org/do
>From 359d1b0a7dcb7320ff28bbabe792e0d8e6d399ad Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mark H Weaver
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 17:39:48 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add nginx.
* gnu/packages/web.scm (nginx): New variable.
---
gnu/packages/web.scm | 60
1 f
>From 5796cf1178fbcf41ef1c3d6406adb992d7e71dd0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mark H Weaver
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 15:56:00 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: pcre: Update to 8.36 and enable JIT support.
* gnu/packages/pcre.scm (pcre): Update to 8.36. Enable JIT support.
---
gnu/packages/pcre.scm | 6
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 7:33 PM, Mark H Weaver wrote:
> It's not uncommon for some tests to fail occasionally in certain
> packages. Reasons I've seen include: timeouts set too short, race
> conditions, randomized tests that fail for some values, and dependencies
> on the kernel version and/or co
Federico Beffa writes:
> I've noticed that on hydra python2-numpy-1.9.1 for x86_64-linux (and
> other architectures) fails to pass the test procedure (really the
> module local version without documentation called
> python2-numpy-bootstrap-1.9.1):
>
> http://hydra.gnu.org/build/172563
>
> So, I'v
Hi,
I've noticed that on hydra python2-numpy-1.9.1 for x86_64-linux (and
other architectures) fails to pass the test procedure (really the
module local version without documentation called
python2-numpy-bootstrap-1.9.1):
http://hydra.gnu.org/build/172563
So, I've built it locally to investigate
宋文武 skribis:
> * gnu/packages/xorg.scm (libxcomposite): Move all existing 'inputs'
> to 'propagated-inputs'.
OK.
Ludo'.
宋文武 skribis:
> * gnu/packages/gtk.scm (gdk-pixbuf): Move glib and libpng to
> 'propagated-inputs'.
OK!
Ludo'.
Federico Beffa skribis:
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 9:48 AM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>>> I think we should revert the gobject-introspection update for now.
>>>
>>> What do you think?
>>
>> Yes, let’s create a branch with all the update work the two of you have
>> done, and revert the upgrade in mas
Federico Beffa skribis:
> From 557cd2fc4e0944cbaa45bb4e89be975d6f56d812 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Federico Beffa
> Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2014 15:58:24 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add cffi.
>
> * gnu/packages/python.scm (python-cffi, python2-cffi): New variables.
[...]
> +(home-page "ht
* gnu/packages/xorg.scm (libxcomposite): Move all existing 'inputs'
to 'propagated-inputs'.
---
gnu/packages/xorg.scm | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/xorg.scm b/gnu/packages/xorg.scm
index 7336fdd..fcefebf 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/xorg.scm
+++
* gnu/packages/gtk.scm (gdk-pixbuf): Move glib and libpng to
'propagated-inputs'.
---
gnu/packages/gtk.scm | 7 ---
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/gtk.scm b/gnu/packages/gtk.scm
index bcfe651..8646397 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/gtk.scm
+++ b/gnu/pac
* gnu/packages/xfce.scm (xfwm4): New variable.
---
gnu/packages/xfce.scm | 27 +++
1 file changed, 27 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/xfce.scm b/gnu/packages/xfce.scm
index f32c250..5f2d581 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/xfce.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/xfce.scm
@@ -404,3 +4
* gnu/packages/xfce.scm (thunar): New variable.
---
gnu/packages/xfce.scm | 36 +++-
1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/xfce.scm b/gnu/packages/xfce.scm
index c601852..8955c0f 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/xfce.scm
+++ b/gnu/packa
* gnu/packages/xfce.scm (thunar-volman): New variable.
---
gnu/packages/xfce.scm | 30 ++
1 file changed, 30 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/xfce.scm b/gnu/packages/xfce.scm
index 8955c0f..f32c250 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/xfce.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/xfce.scm
@
* gnu/packages/xfce.scm (xfdesktop): New variable.
---
gnu/packages/xfce.scm | 30 ++
1 file changed, 30 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/xfce.scm b/gnu/packages/xfce.scm
index 5f2d581..d53c5cf 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/xfce.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/xfce.scm
@@ -4
* gnu/packages/xfce.scm (xfce4-settings): New variable.
---
gnu/packages/xfce.scm | 30 ++
1 file changed, 30 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/xfce.scm b/gnu/packages/xfce.scm
index 5f15594..c601852 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/xfce.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/xfce.scm
* gnu/packages/xfce.scm (xfce4-session): New variable.
---
gnu/packages/xfce.scm | 30 ++
1 file changed, 30 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/xfce.scm b/gnu/packages/xfce.scm
index f5f3fc9..5f15594 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/xfce.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/xfce.scm
@
* gnu/packages/xfce.scm (xfce4-appfinder): New variable.
---
gnu/packages/xfce.scm | 25 +
1 file changed, 25 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/xfce.scm b/gnu/packages/xfce.scm
index 2f63562..f5f3fc9 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/xfce.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/xfce.scm
@@ -
* gnu/packages/xfce.scm (xfce4-panel): New variable.
---
gnu/packages/xfce.scm | 30 ++
1 file changed, 30 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/xfce.scm b/gnu/packages/xfce.scm
index 3200993..2f63562 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/xfce.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/xfce.scm
@@
* gnu/packages/xfce.scm (garcon): New variable.
---
gnu/packages/xfce.scm | 27 +++
1 file changed, 27 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/xfce.scm b/gnu/packages/xfce.scm
index 3954d1d..01e86aa 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/xfce.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/xfce.scm
@@ -159,3 +
* gnu/packages/xfce.scm (tumbler): New variable.
---
gnu/packages/xfce.scm | 41 -
1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/xfce.scm b/gnu/packages/xfce.scm
index 01e86aa..3200993 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/xfce.scm
+++ b/gnu
* gnu/packages/xfce.scm (exo): New variable.
---
gnu/packages/xfce.scm | 33 -
1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/xfce.scm b/gnu/packages/xfce.scm
index 554548c..3954d1d 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/xfce.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/xf
* gnu/packages/xfce.scm (xfconf): New variable.
---
gnu/packages/xfce.scm | 28
1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/xfce.scm b/gnu/packages/xfce.scm
index b08984c..3c60b5c 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/xfce.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/xfce.scm
@@ -69,3 +
* gnu/packages/xfce.scm (libxfce4ui): New variable.
---
gnu/packages/xfce.scm | 33 -
1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/xfce.scm b/gnu/packages/xfce.scm
index 3c60b5c..554548c 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/xfce.scm
+++ b/gnu/pack
* gnu/packages/xfce.scm (libxfce4util): New variable.
---
gnu/packages/xfce.scm | 23 +++
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/xfce.scm b/gnu/packages/xfce.scm
index 696fffe..b08984c 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/xfce.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/xfce.scm
@@ -46,3
* gnu/packages/xfce.scm: New file.
* gnu-system.am (GNU_SYSTEM_MODULES): Add it.
---
gnu-system.am | 1 +
gnu/packages/xfce.scm | 48
2 files changed, 49 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 gnu/packages/xfce.scm
diff --git a/gnu-system.am b/
Hi Eelco,
I think the patch below fell through the cracks. ;-)
Is it OK on your side?
Thanks,
Ludo’.
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) skribis:
> Eelco Dolstra skribis:
>
>> On 17/06/14 17:50, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>>
>>> The patch below changes the store so that it flushes what it reads from
>
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 9:48 AM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> I think we should revert the gobject-introspection update for now.
>>
>> What do you think?
>
> Yes, let’s create a branch with all the update work the two of you have
> done, and revert the upgrade in master.
I've reverted the change in
Mark H Weaver skribis:
> Mark H Weaver writes:
>
>> Federico Beffa writes:
>>> What do you prefer? Revert to gobject-introspection 1.38.0, or got
>>> down the version dependency hell?
>>
>> I've started working on this. It turns out we have to go down quite a
>> rabbit hole. Among other thing
31 matches
Mail list logo