Andreas Enge writes:
> Hello!
>
> On Sat, Nov 01, 2014 at 11:48:46AM -0400, David Thompson wrote:
>> +(uri (string-append
>> "mirror://sourceforge/freeimage/Source%20Distribution/"
>> +version "/FreeImage"
>> +(string-jo
Hello!
On Sat, Nov 01, 2014 at 11:48:46AM -0400, David Thompson wrote:
> +(uri (string-append
> "mirror://sourceforge/freeimage/Source%20Distribution/"
> +version "/FreeImage"
> +(string-join (string-split version #\.) ""
This patch adds the freeimage library. It's a handy way to load images
of various formats via a single interface.
How does it look?
>From 908cad8230ecc89dbf36ab54c0687879e4cf9b22 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David Thompson
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 19:50:30 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add freeim
Ludovic Courtès (2014-10-31 02:20 +0300) wrote:
> Alex Kost skribis:
>
>> OK, I'm attaching a patch. Is “Co-authored-by …” enough or should you
>> be credited in some other way?
>
> It’s enough.
>
>>> I’m thinking perhaps we should do something similar for the description
>>> itself, like displa
Andreas Enge (2014-11-01 12:45 +0300) wrote:
> Alex,
>
> On Sat, Nov 01, 2014 at 12:36:30PM +0300, Alex Kost wrote:
>> I think the majority should decide. So if the most of guix people think
>> that it should be named "bar", then let it be so.
>
> for this we would need an "infrastructure": a soc
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 07:20:10PM -0400, Mark H Weaver wrote:
> I got the patch from upstream, but they didn't want to apply it to their
> stable branch. I'm not sure whether the latest release is part of that
> same branch or not. For that matter, I never checked to see if they
> applied it to
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 12:07:14AM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Technically it would be easy to allow the installation of different
> versions of a package in the same profile, but I wonder about the
> implications.
>
> For instance, ‘-u foo’ would upgrade all the installed versions of
> ‘foo’,
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 10:30:24PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Furthermore, unlike software packages, what matters here is the actual
> name of the font or font collection, not the “system name” or “tarball
> name.”
> Here’s a possible answer to the above questions, informally:
> • Use ‘font-
Alex,
On Sat, Nov 01, 2014 at 12:36:30PM +0300, Alex Kost wrote:
> I think the majority should decide. So if the most of guix people think
> that it should be named "bar", then let it be so.
for this we would need an "infrastructure": a social contract, a voting
system and what else not, which s
Good morning everyone.
1) I noticed that in the wip-hurd branch, in hurd-minimal there is a
problem with the autoconf input. Apply the attached diff first.
2) Run make clean before doing anything and rebuild the wip-hurd. It
seems there is a conflict with newer commits. Must rebase on newer
commi
Andreas Enge (2014-10-31 20:58 +0300) wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 01:02:44AM +0300, Alex Kost wrote:
>> I'm against any strict binding to an upstream name. Why should we stick
>> to a (potentially strange) upstream name if we know better how a package
>> should be called?
>
> This is what w
11 matches
Mail list logo
