Re: New x86 machine

2014-08-29 Thread David Thompson
Ludovic Courtès writes: > This is really appreciated and welcome in this time of rebuilds, thanks! > > Now the bottleneck has clearly become the front-end (at least in terms > of RAM, disk space, CPU.) I think we have to consider moving the > front-end elsewhere, possibly on this new machine or

Re: guix-shell?

2014-08-29 Thread David Thompson
Ludovic Courtès writes: > David Thompson skribis: > >> I will implement 'guix shell' if I can get your opinion on the best >> approach to take. Would you tweak guix/scripts/build.scm to handle >> the special case or export the necessary procedures and create a >> guix/scripts/shell.scm module?

Re: [PATCH] gnu: base: Add Glibc-Hurd Headers.

2014-08-29 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi, Manolis! I have finally reviewed the 2 pending patches of yours that add glibc-hurd and glibc-hurd-headers. I’ve combined these 2 patches as well as the hurd-minimal one into a single one to make a self-contained patch. I’ve then reviewed it, which led me to simplify a few things, and add a

Re: New x86 machine

2014-08-29 Thread Ludovic Courtès
This is really appreciated and welcome in this time of rebuilds, thanks! Now the bottleneck has clearly become the front-end (at least in terms of RAM, disk space, CPU.) I think we have to consider moving the front-end elsewhere, possibly on this new machine or the one provided by TUM. For that,

Re: Merging guix.el

2014-08-29 Thread Alex Kost
Hello, Ludovic Courtès (2014-08-29 00:09 +0400) wrote: > Alex Kost skribis: > >> Ludovic Courtès (2014-08-28 16:41 +0400) wrote: >> >>> Alex Kost skribis: [...] I imagine there may be... for example vi users, who wouldn't want to install this feature, so I made some changes in "conf

Re: [PATCH] gnu: glibc: Fix CVE-2014-5519

2014-08-29 Thread Ludovic Courtès
m...@netris.org skribis: > I think we should ask hydra to build all of core-updates and then merge > core-updates into master. Yes, please. Please monitor for ENOSPC conditions on hydra.gnu.org, and stop hydra-queue-runner if that happens (that should really be checked by a cron job), just the t