I'm currently staying at a place with a slow net connection, where it
takes several hours to download texlive-20140525-texmf.tar.xz (1.74 GB).
Several times in a row, the download has failed with:
building of
`/gnu/store/9cdy0640fxi0dr9fy29g6nr34qi79i81-texlive-20140525-texmf.tar.xz.drv'
timed
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Andreas Enge skribis:
>
>> On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 11:22:14AM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>>> So I’m inclined to just leave it on core-updates for now. WDYT?
>>
>> As the fix entails essentially a complete rebuild of our packages, how about
>> merging c
With the talk of potentially merging the core-updates branch, I thought
I should get this patch reviewed, since it triggers a full rebuild.
While working with some Imake-based packages recently, I found that
patch-makefile-SHELL did not like when the SHELL definition contained
arguments. For exam
Hello,
Ludovic Courtès (2014-08-23 16:17 +0400) wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I think we can merge guix.el in the repo anytime now. Here are some
> notes on how this could be done:
>
> • Put all the .el and .scm files of the guix.el repo under an emacs/
> directory.
Done. I have made “emacs-ui” br
Andreas Enge skribis:
> The patch below should do what is says... I needed to add the flags in two
> places, actually. Can I push it?
[...]
> * guix/build-system/perl.scm (perl-build): Add support for variables
> parallel-build? and parallel-tests?.
> * guix/build-system/gnu.scm (gnu-build)
Andreas Enge skribis:
> On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 11:22:14AM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> So I’m inclined to just leave it on core-updates for now. WDYT?
>
> As the fix entails essentially a complete rebuild of our packages, how about
> merging core-updates back into master now?
I’m not sure
The patch below should do what is says... I needed to add the flags in two
places, actually. Can I push it?
Andreas
* guix/build-system/perl.scm (perl-build): Add support for variables
parallel-build? and parallel-tests?.
* guix/build-system/gnu.scm (gnu-build): Add a line break for clarity.
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 11:22:14AM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> So I’m inclined to just leave it on core-updates for now. WDYT?
As the fix entails essentially a complete rebuild of our packages, how about
merging core-updates back into master now?
Andreas
m...@netris.org skribis:
> I'll push this patch to core-updates as soon as I've tested it.
>
> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17187
> https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commitdiff;h=a1a6a401ab0a3c9f15fb7eaebbdcee24192254e8
> http://googleprojectzero.blogspot.co.nz/2014/08/t
Hi!
It would be really cool if, once a package with a share/emacs/site-lisp
sub-directory has been installed, guix.el would offer to load it, just
like package.el does. (That would pretty much make guix.el a drop-in
replacement, I think.)
TIA. :-)
Ludo’.
Alex Kost skribis:
> Ludovic Courtès (2014-08-22 12:56 +0400) wrote:
>
>> Alex Kost skribis:
>>
>>> Thanks, now (with the latest “guix pull”), installing/upgrading/removing
>>> should work in "guix.el". If you (or someone else) wish to try it, you
>>> may use:
>>>
>>> (setq guix-dry-run t)
>>
11 matches
Mail list logo