On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 01:15:42AM +0200, Ludovic Court??s wrote:
John Darrington skribis:
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 05:00:40PM +0200, Ludovic Court??s wrote:
>
> The package itself cannot install things setuid (nothing can be
setuid
> in the store),
Hi everybody,
I would like to bring up the issue of determinism.
I've come across this pull-request in nixpkgs
https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/2281
so I would like to ask, how is guix standing?
how is it good at build determinism?
this post
https://gist.github.com/madjar/545e1a9b6a8f9b7fae
David Thompson asked:
> Any ideas?
I have one of these machines too. You're using the fork of coreboot
called libreboot right? The grub.cfg that you see is in from the flash
chip. Try using the "Scan" option at the bottom to have it scan the
HDD and use that grub.cfg instead.
Once the Scan option
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> The installation image does include the development version, as you
> noticed.
>
> When you run ‘guix system init’ from the USB stick, that’s the
> development version that’s used, specifically commit 20b1d19.
>
> However, (@ (gnu packages package-management) guix) in co
Cyril Roelandt skribis:
> * doc/guix.texi: Update the documentation.
> * guix/scripts/package.scm: Add a "show" option.
> * tests/guix-package.sh: Add a test for the "show" option.
[...]
> +@item --show=@var{package}
> +Show details about a given package in @code{recutils} format (@pxref{Top, G
Cyril Roelandt skribis:
> * guix/packages.scm (package-direct-inputs): New procedure.
> * tests/packages.scm: Test it.
> * guix/ui.scm (package->recutils): Print the dependencies of the package.
[...]
> --- a/guix/ui.scm
> +++ b/guix/ui.scm
> @@ -456,6 +456,14 @@ WIDTH columns."
>;; Note: D
Eric Bavier skribis:
> Ludovic Courtès writes:
[...]
>> Could you use a vhash here instead of the hash table?
>
> Yes, that shouldn't be a problem. Could I ask why the request?
I prefer functional style (except for build-side code), for clarity
among other things.
[...]
>> I believe ‘upstre
John Darrington skribis:
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 05:00:40PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>
> The package itself cannot install things setuid (nothing can be setuid
> in the store), but there can be setuid programs in the system (see
> gnu/system.scm.)
>
> I'm not sur
John Darrington skribis:
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 05:00:40PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>
> > * gnu/packages/version-control.scm (aegis): New variable.
> > * gnu/packages/patches/aegis-constness-error.patch: New file.
> > * gnu/packages/patches/aegis-perl-tempdir1.patch:
Comments or suggestions welcome, in particular regarding the format of
the output.
>From 57aa3ac9bf0a58c0981fbf729dd12756dedd5831 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Eric Bavier
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2014 12:42:01 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] guix: refresh: Add --list-dependent option.
* guix/utils.scm (fold-
Branch merged.
Ludo’.
"Jason Self" skribis:
> From 8214364daf682417d254ef8ec4a4861ad07acdea Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Jason Self
> Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 11:07:11 -0700
> Subject: [PATCH 1/1] gnu: ffmpeg: Update to 2.3.
>
> * gnu/packages/video.scm (ffmpeg): Update to version 2.3.
Applied, thanks!
Ludo’.
"Jason Self" skribis:
> From 46b30545d7a1565b30ae75ceddee8be7713a3e17 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Jason Self
> Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 08:13:26 -0700
> Subject: [PATCH 1/1] gnu: libogg: Update to 1.3.2.
>
> * gnu/packages/xiph.scm (libogg): Update to version 1.3.2.
Applied, thanks!
Ludo’.
David Thompson skribis:
> From reading gnu/system/install.scm file, I would expect it to install
> the guix dev package, not the 0.6 release. I'm quite confused.
OK, here’s the story:
The installation image does include the development version, as you
noticed.
When you run ‘guix system init’
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 05:00:40PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
The package itself cannot install things setuid (nothing can be setuid
in the store), but there can be setuid programs in the system (see
gnu/system.scm.)
I'm not sure that I understand that. Maybe you can
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 05:00:40PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> * gnu/packages/version-control.scm (aegis): New variable.
> * gnu/packages/patches/aegis-constness-error.patch: New file.
> * gnu/packages/patches/aegis-perl-tempdir1.patch: New file.
> * gnu/packages/patch
Sorry for the delay, (damn greek summer temperatures)
here is the updated patch.
I added explanations to all the patches as you told me, so to be
better understood why I did what I did.
Thanks,
Manolis
From 9195c2d57bc0e3aad2a4beb6806ba8d6be8b33e4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Manolis Ragkousis
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) skribis:
> I’ll do that and some more testing. If everything goes well, we could
> release on Thursday. Otherwise that’ll be after the Cauldron.
So we’re now targeting Wednesday 23rd. There are bugs to fix by then...
Ludo’.
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 11:05 AM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> David Thompson skribis:
>
>> I noticed that the i686 build for Guix 0.6 is failing on hydra, so it's
>> failing here for similar reasons.
>
> Actually 0.6 fails, but not the development version:
Yes, I noticed that, too. Thanks for help
David Thompson skribis:
> I noticed that the i686 build for Guix 0.6 is failing on hydra, so it's
> failing here for similar reasons.
Actually 0.6 fails, but not the development version:
http://hydra.gnu.org/eval/93654?filter=guix&compare=93605&full=#tabs-still-succeed
Ludo’.
Hi,
Please write “gnu: Add Aegis.” in the summary line. “New variable” is
when referring to the variable itself in the ChangeLog part.
John Darrington skribis:
> * gnu/packages/version-control.scm (aegis): New variable.
> * gnu/packages/patches/aegis-constness-error.patch: New file.
> * gnu/pa
David Thompson skribis:
> David Thompson writes:
>
>> From reading gnu/system/install.scm file, I would expect it to install
>> the guix dev package, not the 0.6 release. I'm quite confused.
>
> Okay, so as a hack I edited the package definition for guix 0.6 so that
> it would skip the test sui
22 matches
Mail list logo
