On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 06:34:38PM -0500, Karl Berry via RT wrote:
On the other hand, having translations simultaneously happening in TP
and www seems like a lot of headache to me.
I agree, and this is what I was alluding to in my previous emails - and in some
cases the work is n
On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 06:34:38PM -0500, Karl Berry via RT wrote:
On the other hand, having translations simultaneously happening in TP
and www seems like a lot of headache to me.
I agree, and this is what I was alluding to in my previous emails - and in some
cases the work is n
What would you prefer?
I prefer plain text, but I don't feel that strongly about it, as such.
about not introducing HTML markup in the translated text?
If the "translation" you're referring to is the home-pkgblurbs.html file
which the web translators work with, that is (obviously) specif
What would you prefer?
I prefer plain text, but I don't feel that strongly about it, as such.
about not introducing HTML markup in the translated text?
If the "translation" you're referring to is the home-pkgblurbs.html file
which the web translators work with, that is (obviously) specif
Hi!
I’ll be talking about Guix at FOSDEM, in the “Distributions” track:
https://fosdem.org/2014/schedule/event/gnuguix/
If you’re around on Sunday 2nd, please do stop by!
Until then, let’s discuss it if you have suggestions, things you’d like
to hear about, things you’d like to be demoed, etc
On 01/11/2014 10:21 AM, Ludovic Courtès via RT wrote:
> how about not introducing HTML markup in the translated text?
I'm afraid www.gnu.org translators would object; sometimes they
want to adjust the markup.
"Karl Berry via RT" skribis:
> I thought you guys didn't want these hypothetical TP translators to see
> HTML. If you do, fine, we can make the original be HTML, at least as
> far as the internal text goes, which is the only concern here afaik.
This is really just a suggestion. What would you
"Karl Berry via RT" skribis:
> I thought you guys didn't want these hypothetical TP translators to see
> HTML. If you do, fine, we can make the original be HTML, at least as
> far as the internal text goes, which is the only concern here afaik.
This is really just a suggestion. What would you
