On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 11:05:22PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> John Darrington skribis:
> > I wondered why mesa is defined in the module xorg.scm since it really
> > doesn't have
> > much to do with X, other than X is one graphics system it supports.
> >
> > Wouldn't the module gl.scm be a be
* gnu/packages/gnome.scm (gtkglext): New variable
---
gnu-system.am |3 +
gnu/packages/gnome.scm | 27
.../gtkglext-disable-disable-deprecated.patch | 36 ++
.../gtkglext-remove-pangox-dependency.patch|
* gnu/packages/games.scm (gnubik): New variable
---
gnu-system.am |1 +
gnu/packages/games.scm | 59
2 files changed, 60 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 gnu/packages/games.scm
diff --git a/gnu-system.am b/gnu-system.am
index 015096
On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 11:09:33PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
Also, please add them to gnu-system.am.
Thanks for the reminder. Why didn't I get an error when I ran make ?
J'
--
PGP Public key ID: 1024D/2DE827B3
fingerprint = 8797 A26D 0854 2EAB 0285 A290 8A67 719C 2D
j...@gnu.org skribis:
> * gnu/packages/games.scm (gnubik): New procdeure
Looks good to me, will push along with v2 of the other one.
Ludo’.
j...@gnu.org skribis:
> From: John Darrington
>
> * gnu/packages/gnome.scm (gtkglext): New procedure
s/procedure/variable./
> gnu/packages/gnome.scm | 27
> .../patches/disable-disable-deprecated.patch | 36 ++
> .../patches/remove-pangox-dependen
John Darrington skribis:
> I wondered why mesa is defined in the module xorg.scm since it really doesn't
> have
> much to do with X, other than X is one graphics system it supports.
>
> Wouldn't the module gl.scm be a better location?
Probably yes, although several Xorg components (mostly drive