* gnu/packages/cmake.scm: bump to 2.8.12
---
gnu/packages/cmake.scm | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Our Nix friends seem to think that this is a cmake issue, likely to be fixed in
2.8.12:
http://www.mail-archive.com/nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl/msg10114.html
Could you
On 10/23/2013 03:19 PM, Andreas Enge wrote:
Hello,
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 08:00:50PM -0400, David Thompson wrote:
I'm starting to work on packages for SDL and its extension
libraries. They depend on some libraries that are not yet packaged.
This is the first of these packages: libmikmod.
how
Hello,
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 08:00:50PM -0400, David Thompson wrote:
> I'm starting to work on packages for SDL and its extension
> libraries. They depend on some libraries that are not yet packaged.
> This is the first of these packages: libmikmod.
how about putting all of them into a module n
Hello,
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 06:14:47PM -0500, Eric Bavier wrote:
> This patch adds the pem package. Comments welcome.
it looks good to me and compiles. I would recommend to accept the patch.
Thanks a lot for your contribution!
Andreas
Andreas Enge writes:
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 01:11:50AM -0400, Mark H Weaver wrote:
>> A failing test in glib alerted me to a bug in libffi on MIPS N32. I've
>> pushed a fix[*] to the 'loongson' branch.
>
> Excellent! Did you report it upstream?
Yes: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.ff
Nikita Karetnikov writes:
> The coreutils package fails to build:
>
> FAIL: test-fchownat (exit: 134)
> ===
>
> test-chown.h:193: assertion failed
Hmm. The same derivation (with the same hash) passes this test and
builds successfully on my YeeLoong. Perhaps the prob
(Not sure why my previous messages weren’t signed.)
>> Now, should I test the mentioned fix?
> Yes, please do!
The coreutils package fails to build:
FAIL: test-fchownat (exit: 134)
===
test-chown.h:193: assertion failed
[…]
==
1
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 01:11:50AM -0400, Mark H Weaver wrote:
> A failing test in glib alerted me to a bug in libffi on MIPS N32. I've
> pushed a fix[*] to the 'loongson' branch.
Excellent! Did you report it upstream?
Andreas
Hello Nikita,
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 01:08:55PM +0400, Nikita Karetnikov wrote:
> The attached patch requires this one [1].
I would suggest to add lapack only after the fortran compiler is in master.
You might wish to put the variable into maths.scm.
> 2. These files are not free:
>lapacke/
> (home-page "http://www.gnu.org/software/lapack/";)
Oops, I’ll fix this.
pgpmG10JlJOS3.pgp
Description: PGP signature
The attached patch requires this one [1].
1. Could anyone explain why the tests fail?
100% tests passed, 0 tests failed out of 86
Total Test time (real) = 169.48 sec
No such file or directory
Problem running command: ./lapack_testing.py -s -d TESTING
Problem executing post-test co
11 matches
Mail list logo