Hello!
Our wonderful manual, under “Building the Bootstrap Binaries” [0],
questions when we reach fixed point. I rebuilt the bootstrap binaries
in an attempt to answer that question.
Basically, after two runs I got the bit-for-bit identical tarball for
Binutils, but the other 4 tarballs differed
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) skribis:
> Thanks again to Christian for insisting ;-) and for the enlightening
> discussions we’ve had, and to Mark H. Weaver for pushing some more.
... and I forgot to thank Andreas for his insightful comments in Paris
and afterward.
Ludo’.
pgpXkc6Tgy2Cl.pgp
De
Nikita Karetnikov skribis:
>>> Can I push the attached patch to ‘master’?
>
>> Yep!
>
> Done.
Great, thank you!
Ludo’.
> That’s not necessarily a bug: it could be that generation 1 is just
> slightly more than 48 hours old (the time should also be displayed, I
> think.)
Right, that’s what I was trying to show. Anyway, it shouldn’t be an
issue now.
OK, I added ‘~T’.
> This should be present tense overall (for ex
Nikita Karetnikov skribis:
>> Ah so I was referring to recutils record sets (I thought you were
>> talking about SRFI-9 records or something.) So what’s the question?
>> :-)
>
> I was trying to explain why we shouldn’t always output generations in
> the recutils format. It works for ‘--search’
