> Ah so I was referring to recutils record sets (I thought you were
> talking about SRFI-9 records or something.) So what’s the question?
> :-)
I was trying to explain why we shouldn’t always output generations in
the recutils format. It works for ‘--search’ because there’s only one
record.
>>
Andreas Enge skribis:
> On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 11:05:25PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> comply (like TeX Live’s ‘getnonfreefonts’)
>
> Just as a comment, this is, as far as I can tell, not contained in the
> regular texlive distribution. I cannot locate it on my system.
It used to be the cas
Nikita Karetnikov skribis:
> 3. ‘guix package -l -p test’ returns ‘guix package: error: test:
>extraneous argument’. (However, the same happens with ‘-I’.)
That’s because -p is interpreted as the optional argument to -l, and so
‘test’ is considered an extra argument.
Ludo’.
Nikita Karetnikov skribis:
>> Not sure what you mean by “two record sets”.
>
> “You can have two record sets: one for generations, one for
> packages.” [1]
Ah so I was referring to recutils record sets (I thought you were
talking about SRFI-9 records or something.) So what’s the question?
:-)
Commit 59688fc introduces notable changes: ‘derivation’,
‘build-expression->derivation’, ‘package-derivation’ and similar
procedures now return a single value, which is a object
(previously they would return two values: the .drv file name, and the
object.) The object embeds its .drv file name
n
> I’ve just found a bug. On my machine, ‘guix package -p test -l 2d’
> and ‘guix package -p test -l’ should return the same set of
> generations, but the fourth generation is shown twice in the former
> case.
Generations 4 and 5 have the same creation date for some reason:
scheme@(guix ui)> date
On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 11:05:25PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> comply (like TeX Live’s ‘getnonfreefonts’)
Just as a comment, this is, as far as I can tell, not contained in the
regular texlive distribution. I cannot locate it on my system.
Andreas
