Great news! :)
Noah Lavine writes:
> I looked at the emacswiki page you linked. It links to a page called
> GuileEmacsTodo, but that doesn't seem to be your current to-do list
> (it was edited too long ago).
The GSoC project has a better to-do list if I'm not mistaken.
By the way I've had it i
joa...@verona.se writes:
> Paul Smith writes:
>
>> On Wed, 2013-07-31 at 20:54 +0200, joa...@verona.se wrote:
>>> #make takes a loong time, much more than a normal emacs
>>> ./autogen.sh && ./configure && make
>>
>> I'm not familiar with building Emacs, but doesn't its build system
>> support par
Dmitry Bogatov writes:
> It seems following is invalid:
>
>(let ((a 2))
> (define (foo x) (+ a x)))
>
> I prefer to reduce scope of variable as much as possible, so
> I find this restriction unconvinent. Is is part of standard or technical
> limitation? Is it any workaround?
>
> Pleas
Panicz Maciej Godek writes:
> Actually, the whole point of hygienic (syntax-rules) macros
> is that you don't need to worry about the names of variables.
>
> I often use a very similar python-like for loop macro in my projects:
>
> http://hg.gnu.org.ua/hgweb/slayer/file/554a63bd3c6c/guile-modules
Panicz Maciej Godek writes:
> I assume that the main reason for using this is efficiency (rather
> than simplicity), because allegedly guile's continuations are rather
> inefficient.
>
> On one hand, it's good to know that (and would be even better
> to be able to find it out by skimming section
Chaos Eternal writes:
> In guile-scsh, user would like the guile recognize -i as symbols
> rather than complex numbers, is there any way?
I doubt that there is a way. Arguably, one should use a different
mechanism to represent command-line switches. Keyword symbols would
probably be suitable f
Panicz Maciej Godek writes:
> - firstly, guile's hash tables are maps, not dictionaries, so they are
> insensitive to order. This behaviour is desired if we want to use them
> to represent sets or maps; however, PHP arrays, and -- as I presume --
> JavaScript objects -- store the information abou
Panicz Maciej Godek writes:
> Well, I see why the representation based on hash tables is adequate
> for JSON. There are, however, situations, when one wants to have an
> ordered set, and it's good to have choice. Clojure, for instance,
> offers such choice, and from the perspective of a programme
Panicz Maciej Godek writes:
> I agree. But Adam Smith would say that it's the market who says what's
> right and what's wrong ;)
I don't know Adam Smith, but I know that I disagree with this particular
quote, at least at face value. I will continue to disregard adoption
rates while considering a
Good day,
I would like to announce a small project of mine, which I started out
of boredom but figured could be useful in a couple of FFI situations.
Just throwing it out there.
https://github.com/TaylanUB/scheme-bytestructures/
You know how C's weak type-system basically just provides "views" o
This is only partially relevant to the topic, but I'm very fond of the
run-loop/operation-queue based solution to the problem of ad-hoc
interleaved code execution in a certain thread, should the application
also otherwise lend itself to that generic architecture.
I have some spare time so let me e
Thien-Thi Nguyen writes:
> () taylanbayi...@gmail.com (Taylan Ulrich B.)
> () Fri, 31 May 2013 13:20:00 +0200
>
>I'm not aware of any Guile library that implements run-loops and
>dispatch queues yet; perhaps I should try to implement one.
>
> See also module
I agree with Thien on that all resource-management should be delegated
to the garbage collector via smob types.
However, I found this supply-demand pattern quite neat (could have other
uses perhaps), was kind of bored, with a little free time on my hands,
and enjoy an occasional exercise in delimi
13 matches
Mail list logo
