On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 2:26 PM, Panicz Maciej Godek
wrote:
> And hence my question: is there any way to restrict
> the execution environment of eval, e.g. to specify
> which symbols should be available? (For security
> reasons, I wouldn't want functions like "system"
> or "exit" to be present in
Understood. Thanks for sharing that.
On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 1:33 PM, Panicz Maciej Godek
wrote:
> Hi!
>
> 2014-03-23 19:07 GMT+01:00 Grant Rettke :
>> On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 2:26 PM, Panicz Maciej Godek
>> wrote:
>>> And hence my question: is there any way
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 5:05 AM, Neil Jerram wrote:
> True. But you should be able to work around that just by changing [
> and ] back to ( and ).
>
> (Personally I dislike those square brackets, and it seems to me an
> unhelpful editorial choice to use them in TSPL. I don't recall my copy
> hav
Sorry about that you are right.
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 8:36 AM, Gour wrote:
> On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 08:20:17 -0500
>>>>>>> "Grant" == Grant Rettke wrote:
>
> Grant> The current version of _TSPL_, 3, is based on R6RS.
>
> Hmm, based on what
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 3:51 PM, Neil Jerram wrote:
> This email explains why, and invites comments from anyone interested in this
> - especially from anyone who is really trying to use Guile on Windows.
I've decided only to run UNIX origin software on Cygwin as there is
always some "gotcha" that
On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 2:55 PM, Jose A. Ortega Ruiz wrote:
> I've just tagged version 0.1.4 of Geiser, an emacs environment for
> hacking in Guile Scheme and Racket (see http://geiser.nongnu.org for
> more details).
> Happy hacking,
> jao
Thank you Jao!
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 7:10 AM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Thanks a lot to José and Giuseppe who have wonderfully handled GNU’s
> participation in GSoC, and happy hacking!
Thanks guys!
