Re: Starting a GNU Guile awesome list

Zelphir Kaltstahl wrote: > I ‹…› started creating an awesome list > https://notabug.org/ZelphirKaltstahl/awesome-guile +1! However, even if you are not going to apply for inclusion¹ in meta-list and therefore are free from complying with all rules that might come to the mi

Re: Starting a GNU Guile awesome list

"Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide" wrote: >>> In the case you will stick with Org, there at least should be a runnable >>> build recipe (i. e. a Makefile). > > I’d like to cut this discussion short: > > https://notabug.org/ZelphirKaltstahl/awesome-guile/pulls/1/files > all: readme.md readme.texi

Re: A licence for an ‘awesome list’ (was: Starting a GNU Guile awesome list)

Zelphir Kaltstahl wrote: > On 15.07.20 08:36, Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: >> Zelphir Kaltstahl writes: First at foremost, the list _itself_ has to be licensed as a free documentation. FWIW, most of ‘awesome lists’ are under CC0. >>> While the list is not CC0, I meant to put it un

Re: a French mailing list (was: test anything? (Re: My Guile Hacker Handbook))

Marc Chantreux wrote: > hould be nice to have a french mailing list [for Guile] as well FWIW, the help-g...@gnu.org list, which you are crossposting, announce [1] a policy of welcoming mail in many languages besides English, which looks like a pretty sane choice, until there is substantial traf

No Guile on Windows? (was: My Guile Hacker Handbook)

Jérémy Korwin-Zmijowski wrote: > https://jeko.frama.io > ## Installation > ### On Windows > > No solution yet. Is that true? Itʼs true (and a pity) that there no official packages, of course, but ‘no solution’? I vaguely recall, there was a Guile on MinGW a couple of years ago, does it no l

Re: Licensing of Cygwin comatibility layer (was: No Guile on Windows?)

Mike Gran wrote: > Cygwin: use gcc or clang, link to a special C and POSIX library that handles > the Windows API for you. > Its emulation library is GPL[ed] Really? I was under impression, that it is under a _weakened_ variant of _Lesser_ GPL, i. e. its terms are even less restrictive that th

Re: No Guile on Windows?

Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Eli Zaretskii skribis: >> Sadly, Guile seems to care only about one OS: GNU/Linux > my understanding is that Windows Subsystem for Linux (WSL) has the potential > to make all of us happy. Itʼs the most disappointing thing to hear from a Guile maintainer. > For exampl

Re: No Guile on Windows?

David Pirotte wrote: > msys2 > has guile-2.2.7-1 > well maintained > very friendly on irc Appended with fact that MSYS2 is a fork of Cygwin, which has 3.0.4, these looks like an invitation to go to IRC and inquire about issues that made them stick with the legacy branch... signature.asc Desc