Re: HTTP GET Shakespeare

eed the read words into a hash table, instead of using a list and SRFI-1 "delete-duplicates". [0] http://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-1/srfi-1.html#delete-duplicates Regards, Rotty -- Andreas Rottmann -- <http://rotty.xx.vu/>

Re: [ANN] Sly 0.1 released

is it just tarballs for the time being? [1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7959871 Regards, Rotty -- Andreas Rottmann -- <http://rotty.xx.vu/>

Re: Modifying nested dictionary/alist type data

9.html http://www.r6rs.org/final/html/r6rs-lib/r6rs-lib-Z-H-14.html Guile 2.0 supports all three of these APIs -- choosing between them is mostly important if you care about portability to different Scheme implementations (which I'd guess is not high priority in the context of lilypond).

Re: equivalent of "this" in goops?

. > My fallback is to initialize the linkset on first use, or after object > createion, or something like that. > Given a GOOPS with this hypothetical extension is far from official release ;), a workaround is probably the only feasibly short-term solution (given my assumtion that this is n

G-Wrap 1.9.5 released

been fixed. Regards, Rotty -- Andreas Rottmann | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://yi.org/rotty | GnuPG Key: http://yi.org/rotty/gpg.asc Fingerprint | DFB4 4EB4 78A4 5EEE 6219 F228 F92F CFC5 01FD 5B62 The best way to accelerate a

Re: Urgent need for solution: guile to serve the web (+ python?)

plement SCGI[0] for Guile? [0] http://www.mems-exchange.org/software/scgi/ Rotty -- Andreas Rottmann | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://yi.org/rotty | GnuPG Key: http://yi.org/rotty/gpg.asc Fingerprint | DFB4 4EB4 78A4 5EEE 6219 F2

Re: guile-core.unstable-20050414

; but the following package is installed: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ 3 $ dpkg -l | grep gmp > ii libgmp34.1.4-6Multiprecision arithmetic library > You need libgmp3-dev. Rotty -- Andreas Rottmann | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL P

libgwrapguile1: file conflict with libgwrap-runtime0-dev

e encountered while processing: > g-wrap > Oops, this is indeed a problem. g-wrap-config should be moved from libgwrapguile1 to libgwrapguile-dev, against which libgwrap-runtime0-dev conflicts (since 1.9.6-1, IIRC). I'll try to do an upload and get it into Sarge ASAP. Regards, Rot

Re: guile projects list entry for BOKIN

installing. > > GNU Make is used not only for the installation but also for the accounting > calculations. GNU Make is useful for batch based systems like BOKIN. > Ew, sounds messy to use make for application logic (IMO it's already messy enough for build systems ;). SCNR, Rotty --

Re: guile projects list entry for BOKIN

ngs, but that doesn't mean it's a clever idea. For instance, Make lacks any type system, which makes programming more complex things in it a major PITA, IMO. Regards, Rotty -- Andreas Rottmann | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://yi.org/rotty

Re: Modified load-path proposal

e && sudo make install" of some package would put files under /usr just because guile happens to be installed there. -- Andreas Rottmann | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://yi.org/rotty | GnuPG Key: http://yi.org/rotty/gpg.asc Fingerprint

Thoughts on g-wrap, guile FFI and guile-gnome [was: 1.9.11 ffi reference bug]

[ Sorry for the crossposting, but I think (a part of) the message is relevant for all mailing lists I'm sending this to ] Greg Troxel writes: [ Regarding the need for a G-Wrap release, due to a bug ] > It is. I've a release tarball ready, will upload this weekend (along > with guile-gnom

Re: Thoughts on g-wrap, guile FFI and guile-gnome

Andy Wingo writes: > Hello! > > Your insights in reverse: > > On Sat 21 Feb 2009 03:52, Andreas Rottmann writes: > >> it might make sense to provide a pure-Scheme FFI inside Guile core >> (perhaps just molding the current G-Wrap runtime library into shape). >>

Re: bindings for free identifiers in (ice-9 syncase)

Julian Graham writes: > Hi Guilers, > > Alright, I've been banging my head against this for several weeks now > and only just had the time to sit down and research this: If you use a > symbol in an `(ice-9 syncase)' macro definition that's bound in the > lexical closure in which that definition l

Re: Valgrind warnings with -1.8.6

Andrew Gaylard writes: > Hi, > > I'm linking with libguile on Linux, built from source, to extend my > C application with Scheme. I'm seeing a lot of warnings from > valgrind.  The same warnings appear when using Guile standalone. > Should I be worried? > No, this is normal AFAIK. The garbage col

Re: survey: indentation declaration style

Thien-Thi Nguyen writes: > I've tentatively adopted the following indentation declaration style. > Non-coincidentally, it resembles that used for Emacs Lisp code. > The #; represents pan-Scheme (R7RS?) wishful thinking. > > (define-macro (forse precond . corpo) > ;;#;(declare (indent 1)) >

Re: Checking for guile from configure -- forward compat.

versions parallel-installable, you have to use different .pc file names. Regards, Rotty -- Andreas Rottmann -- <http://rotty.yi.org/>

G-Wrap 1.9.13 released

27;ve migrated the G-Wrap bzr repository to git, see http://www.nongnu.org/g-wrap/development.html Enjoy! Regards, Rotty -- Andreas Rottmann -- <http://rotty.yi.org/>

Re: return-it -> ???

I think in Scheme this is more commonly called `begin0', and at least PLT and Gauche provide it. Regards, Rotty -- Andreas Rottmann -- <http://rotty.yi.org/>

Re: Need help to understand a macro

so it's best to avoid them like the plague. At least that's my experience, FWIW. Regards, Rotty -- Andreas Rottmann -- <http://rotty.yi.org/>

Re: Need help to understand a macro

Josef Wolf writes: > On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 05:15:57PM +0100, Andreas Rottmann wrote: >> defmacros are bound to bite you in the proverbial ass real hard when you >> combine them with modules, so it's best to avoid them like the >> plague. At least that's my exper

Re: Failing to build g-wrap for guile 1.9.10

ndy Wingo, you can also use `--disable-Werror' when running configure. diff --git a/g-wrap/core-runtime.c b/g-wrap/core-runtime.c index cb0f310..66c24a5 100644 --- a/g-wrap/core-runtime.c +++ b/g-wrap/core-runtime.c @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ /********

Re: Failing to build g-wrap for guile 1.9.10

f GCC and glibc did you use? Regards, Rotty -- Andreas Rottmann -- <http://rotty.yi.org/>

Re: Failing to build g-wrap for guile 1.9.10

current g-wrap git? Regards, Rotty -- Andreas Rottmann -- <http://rotty.yi.org/>

Re: What does #-3# mean?

hese readable in the main line? > I'd like to implement SRFI-38, and perhaps the best way would be to modify the core reader/writer, instead of adding something like the reference implementation? Would this require a new reader option, or should it be always enabled? Regards, Rotty -- Andreas Rottmann -- <http://rotty.yi.org/>

Re: Can't define in (if...) after (use-syntax (ice-9 syncase)) ?

ed, and rejects your example code as well: scheme@(guile-user)> (if #t (define foo "bar")) While compiling expression: ERROR: In procedure macroexpand: ERROR: definition in expression context in subform `foo' of `"bar"' What do you want to achieve in your code? Regards, Rotty -- Andreas Rottmann -- <http://rotty.yi.org/>

Re: Guile base64

this could bring the versions a good deal closer together. ] Regards, Rotty -- Andreas Rottmann -- <http://rotty.yi.org/>

Re: [r6rs] abusive request for help on "unbound variable" error

ementations. > Indeed `assert' is missing from Guile ATM, but I've submitted a patch a while ago that fixes that (among other things): <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guile-devel/2010-10/msg00098.html> I hope that someone gives that patch a review soon (*hint* *hint*)... Regards, Rotty -- Andreas Rottmann -- <http://rotty.yi.org/>

Re: [r6rs] abusive request for help on "unbound variable" error

Andreas Rottmann writes: > Indeed `assert' is missing from Guile ATM, but I've submitted a patch a > while ago that fixes that (among other things): > > <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guile-devel/2010-10/msg00098.html> > Uh, sorry, that one doesn't apply

Re: Modules

ade the default; for an installed program implemented in Guile, having "." implicitly in the load path would be unneccessary and even a security issue. Regards, Rotty -- Andreas Rottmann -- <http://rotty.yi.org/>

Re: Problem with define-macro from compiled file (Guile 1.9)

ntax' easier: > > [...] It's not only easier, it also not inherently broken (as `define-macro' is). See <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hygienic_macro> for a discussion of the hygiene issue. For example, the following invocation of `when' will break when implemented with `define-macro' as above: (let ((begin #f)) (when #t (display "Launching missiles!\n"))) Regards, Rotty -- Andreas Rottmann -- <http://rotty.yi.org/>

Re: FFI nuisance

of the library in the Guile program, as to avoid random breakage when the ABI changes (which does imply a SONAME bump on sanely-maintained libraries). Regards, Rotty -- Andreas Rottmann -- <http://rotty.yi.org/>

Re: FFI nuisance

Aidan Gauland writes: > On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 03:49:22PM +0100, Andreas Rottmann wrote: >> l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: >> >> > Hi, >> > >> > Aidan Gauland writes: >> > >> >> I'm trying to use SDL through Guil

Re: syntax-rules problem

elements ... identifier) (set! identifier (cons* elements ... identifier) Note that the above relies on R6RS-specified extensions to `syntax-rules' patterns that are not yet available in Guile 1.8. HTH, Rotty -- Andreas Rottmann -- <http://rotty.yi.org/>

Re: Guile-Lib 0.2.1 released

Updates for Guile 1.8. > > Some of the compatibility hacks from 0.2.0 broke Guile-Lib on Guile > 1.8. Thanks to Andreas Rottmann for the various fixes. > Additionally, there have been fixes to allow Guile-Lib to work on Guile 2.0, even when the latter is compiled with --disable-depreca

Re: error building from "master" checkout

t; Is it fine for me to follow the "master" branch to get the "latest > thought to be usable"? > ATM, most work is happening on stable-2.0, and master is only updated sporadically. Unless you want do work on Guile itself that's supposed to go into 2.2 (only) eventually, I'd recommend using the stable-2.0 branch. See also <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guile-devel/2011-03/msg00010.html>. Regards, Rotty -- Andreas Rottmann -- <http://rotty.yi.org/>

Re: Build System?

ould be interesting if you could clarify what exactly you are looking for. [0] http://home.gna.org/dorodango/ -- Andreas Rottmann -- <http://rotty.yi.org/>

Re: open-pipe deadlocked

his sounds like a bug; could you come up with an example program that has a good chance to run into this suspected issue? [1] http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/007904975/functions/pthread_atfork.html Regards, Rotty -- Andreas Rottmann -- <http://rotty.yi.org/>

Re: scm_defined_p(sym, env)

HTH, Rotty PS: Please consider avoiding top-posts (see for instance <http://www.usenet-replayer.com/faq/alt.games.generals.html> for a rationale). -- Andreas Rottmann -- <http://rotty.yi.org/>

G-Wrap 1.9.14 released

ards, Rotty -- Andreas Rottmann -- <http://rotty.yi.org/>