just for the fun things, i just find that the parallelized results are
false :-) even for low indices:
the non // result: C5 = ((B1 ∧ B3) ∨ (B2 ∧ B3) ∨ (B2 ∧ B4))
is different than the parallelized result below:
C5 = ((B1 ∧ B3) ∨ (B2 ∧ B3) ∨ (B2 ∧ B4) ∨ (B3 ∧ B4))
i have to check things again ,i t
after intense coding i finally got the good results,
my assumption about the global variable hash table was true ,it is
incompatible with 'future : the competition for the writing into the hash
table breaks the code.
If i do writing in hash table out of // region all is ok:
a simple function to e
Hi Guilers,
Guile-SDL2 0.8.0 has been released! Guile-SDL2 provides FFI bindings
to the SDL2 library.
Release notes and download links can be found here:
https://dthompson.us/guile-sdl2-080-released.html
In related news, I am co-hosting the 2022 Lisp Game Jam which starts
on Friday 10/28. It wou
Le 19/10/2022 à 22:47, Jean Abou Samra a écrit :
This code is behaving as expected. The manual's description of the
example
and the naming "*compilation-date*" look buggy, however.
I've submitted a patch to fix this.
https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=58646
Best,
Jean
Hello Damien!
On 10/23/22 03:06, Damien Mattei wrote:
after intense coding i finally got the good results,
my assumption about the global variable hash table was true ,it is
incompatible with 'future : the competition for the writing into the hash
table breaks the code.
If i do writing in ha
On Sun, Oct 23, 2022 at 10:41 AM Aleix Conchillo Flaqué <
aconchi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 1:26 AM pukkamustard
> wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Aleix Conchillo Flaqué writes:
>>
>> > Would it be possible to create a tarball for version 0.1.0? I'd love to
>> add the libra
Hi!
On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 1:26 AM pukkamustard
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Aleix Conchillo Flaqué writes:
>
> > Would it be possible to create a tarball for version 0.1.0? I'd love to
> add the library to Homebrew Guile.
>
> I've just upoaded a tarball to:
>
>
> https://inqlab.net/projects/guile-srfi-
Zelphir Kaltstahl writes:
> Of course,if you have global state and do not have a synchronization
> construct for accessing the hash table, I would expect things to
> go wrong at some point, with non-reproducible results.
Indeed.
> I do not think that futures are to blame here,
> or parallel map
Hello Zelphir,
i should had written first about the mathematical problem first but i did
not want to go into other than computer things. But i expose here the main
idea briefly: i try to solve a mathematical conjecture (
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conjecture ) using logic expressions but not
in
