Hello Linus!
On 8/5/22 11:42, Linus Björnstam wrote:
I wrote this, which does a tree fold over a sexp:
https://hg.sr.ht/~bjoli/megacut/browse/readme.txt?rev=tip
It is unhygienic currently, and I will probably never change because I only use
it at the repl.
The code is really just a syntax-ca
Hi,
Say I want to use guile-dbi wich use Guile 2.2. Is there any danger for
me to use it with Guile 3.0? I see that Guile will recompile the module
because the already compiled one does not match, I guess. Other than
that, any side effects?
Regards,
old
--
Olivier Dion
oldiob.dev
On 06-08-2022 17:11, Olivier Dion via General Guile related discussions
wrote:
Hi,
Say I want to use guile-dbi wich use Guile 2.2. Is there any danger for
me to use it with Guile 3.0? I see that Guile will recompile the module
because the already compiled one does not match, I guess. Other
On Sat, 06 Aug 2022, Maxime Devos wrote:
> On 06-08-2022 17:11, Olivier Dion via General Guile related discussions
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Say I want to use guile-dbi wich use Guile 2.2. Is there any danger for
>> me to use it with Guile 3.0? I see that Guile will recompile the module
>> because
On 06-08-2022 17:31, Olivier Dion wrote:
old
Going by the package definition, guile-dbd-postgresql seems to make a
Guile extension (C). There have been incompatible changes (both on the
Guile code level, and presumably on the C level). As such, sounds risky
to me.
Also, for whatever reason, g
