On Thu, 17 Feb 2022 at 16:59, Blake Shaw wrote:
>
> https://tube.nocturlab.fr/videos/watch/2b55ca09-f0fd-4899-9cb0-9632cd90b3d1
Wow, what a great reminder of things past! I mean "past" in the sense
that I used to be very strongly focused on this, but have not been for
some years. The material i
On Sat, 19 Feb 2022, Neil Jerram wrote:
> Personally, I am now a big fan of Scheme-centric + FFI, as it means
> always writing Scheme and never having to hack C code. If everyone
> agreed on that, we could discard all the C-centric parts of the
> manual, and focus the rest on a clearer use case.
Il giorno sab, 19/02/2022 alle 10.33 -0500, Olivier Dion via General
Guile related discussions ha scritto:
> On Sat, 19 Feb 2022, Neil Jerram wrote:
>
> > Personally, I am now a big fan of Scheme-centric + FFI, as it means
> > always writing Scheme and never having to hack C code. If everyone
>
Hi,
(Cross-posted to guile-user, guile-devel and the debbugs
issue, I'm unsure where this should go.)
In LilyPond, we have now made a development release with
binaries using Guile 2.2. However, a major problem is that
we don't ship Guile bytecode yet. Notably, one problem
to get the bytecode in
On Sat, 19 Feb 2022, Jean Abou Samra wrote:
I had similar problem with Jami. I added C++ primitives to Guile, but
these were not load using the foreign function interface. Note, I'm
using Guile 3.0.8, but I think the same could be done for Guile 2.0.
Basically what I do is to add a `compile` c
