Thien-Thi Nguyen writes:
> In any case, thanks to your prompting, i've done:
>
>
> http://git.savannah.nongnu.org/cgit/guile-pg.git/commit/?h=p&id=a466c86cd2989d2
>
> Let me know if that's still unclear.
Thanks, that's great.
>Subject: guile-pg 0.47 bug report>
>To: guile-user@gnu.or
Hi Ricardo!
Thanks for your reply. I've not gotten around to trying this yet.
I was hoping for a solution, which could use Elisp in one part of the
makefile and bash in another part of the makefile. I seem to remember a
blog post somewhere, in which someone explained how to use various
things as
On Sun, 2020-11-08 at 18:09 +0100, Zelphir Kaltstahl wrote:
> I was hoping for a solution, which could use Elisp in one part of the
> makefile and bash in another part of the makefile.
I apologize that I wasn't following the previous messages in this
thread so I don't have the full context.
Howev
The guile module used at the repl is indeed the guile-user module. I would look
at how the elisp language is implemented. It switches the repl to the elisp
module where no guile bindings are present.
This is the same as doing ,m (module name) at the repl.
--
Linus Björnstam
On Sat, 7 Nov 2