Another option would be to just overload equal? in match.scm to transform into
eqv? when there are char literals or numbers, eq? on symbols, booleans, the
empty list and keywords and (@@ (guile) equal?) for everything else.
Considering that it in this case contributed a 25% overhead to code tha
Hi
Getting a guile error for
(lambda (x) (x . x))
but not for
(lambda (x) (x x))
This may be a dumb question, but why is this?
Same behavior in versions 2.2.6 and 3.0.2.
Regards
Reetinder Sidhu
(x . x) is not creating a pair, use (cons x x) or `(,x . ,x)
On Fri, May 8, 2020 at 4:16 PM reetindersidhu
wrote:
> Hi
>
> Getting a guile error for
>
> (lambda (x) (x . x))
>
> but not for
>
> (lambda (x) (x x))
>
> This may be a dumb question, but why is this?
>
> Same behavior in versions
ArneBab writes:
> Christopher Lemmer Webber writes:
>
>> Linus Björnstam writes:
>>
>>> I made a module out of Andy's dash (and added some comfort functions
>>> over fash-fold):
>>> https://hg.sr.ht/~bjoli/guile-fash/browse/fash.scm?rev=default
>>
>> BTW, I am getting:
>>
>> cwebber@twig:~/devel$
Is it possible (Guile 3.0) to write a generic function / method for record
values?
I see that a record has a GOOPS class <>, and that a record-type has the
GOOPS class , but it seems that <> is not a subclass of
?
I am playing with the ECMAscript implementation and would like to:
(d
