Mark,
On Sat, Jun 15, 2019 at 08:36:34PM -0400, Mark H Weaver wrote:
> Hi Vladimir,
>
> Vladimir Zhbanov writes:
>
> > Greetings,
> >
> > I have tried almost a textbook example with Guile 2.2.4:
> >
> > scheme@(guile-user)> (define (function-generator)
> >(let ((func #f)
Hello again Vladimir,
Vladimir Zhbanov writes:
> - Is there a way to work around this (either using the above 'let'
> construct or anything else)?
I'm not quite sure how to answer this question because I don't know what
your requirements are.
If you need to generate unique tags, any mutable o
Am So., 16. Juni 2019 um 11:49 Uhr schrieb Mark H Weaver :
>
> Hello again Vladimir,
>
> Vladimir Zhbanov writes:
> > - Is there a way to work around this (either using the above 'let'
> > construct or anything else)?
>
> I'm not quite sure how to answer this question because I don't know what
>
Hi Vladimir,
Vladimir Zhbanov writes:
> On Sat, Jun 15, 2019 at 08:36:34PM -0400, Mark H Weaver wrote:
>> Vladimir Zhbanov writes:
>>
>> > I have tried almost a textbook example with Guile 2.2.4:
>> >
>> > scheme@(guile-user)> (define (function-generator)
>> >(let ((fun
Hi Thomas,
Thomas Morley writes:
> always interested in guile developments with regard to lilypond I
> noticed some inconsistence with my local lilypond-using-guile-2.9.2
> installation.
> I think I could break it down to pure guile (no lilypond)
>
> (1) The already stated behaviour:
> ~$ guile
Hi Mark,
Am So., 16. Juni 2019 um 12:35 Uhr schrieb Mark H Weaver :
> > Did I something wrong or is it a bug?
>
> Neither. This is a case of unspecified behavior, and the behavior of
> our compiler differs from that of our interpreter. You will notice
> similar discrepancies when comparing two
Hello again,
Vladimir Zhbanov writes:
> scheme@(guile-user)> (define (function-generator)
>(let ((func #f))
> (lambda () (set! func (let a () a)) func)))
[...]
> - Is there a way to work around this (either using the abo
On Sun, Jun 16, 2019 at 2:47 AM Mark H Weaver wrote:
> How do you implement 'written-shared', 'pretty-shared', and
> 'trimmed/lazy'? In particular, how do you avoid non-termination when
> asked to print cyclic data, when the cycle includes a non-standard data
> type printed using a custom print
Hello. I am announcing guile-gi v0.0.2.
guile-gi is a library that autogenerates GNU Guile bindings for
GObject libraries that provide typelib files. GNU Guile is an
implementation of Scheme, a Lisp-like language. GObject is a standard
way of writing C-language libraries with headers and introsp
Hi John,
John Cowan writes:
> On Sun, Jun 16, 2019 at 2:47 AM Mark H Weaver wrote:
>
>
>> How do you implement 'written-shared', 'pretty-shared', and
>> 'trimmed/lazy'? In particular, how do you avoid non-termination when
>> asked to print cyclic data, when the cycle includes a non-standard da
On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 01:14:29PM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> Mike Gran writes:
>
>
> ...and I found another one, trying to load text in the test/editor.scm example
>
> (let ((buffer (send editor (get-buffer
> (warn 'buffer buffer) ; => ;; WARNING (buffer #<
> 22bcc30
On Sun, 16 Jun 2019 14:20:27 -0500 Mike Gran wrote
> Hello. I am announcing guile-gi v0.0.2.
>
> guile-gi is a library that autogenerates GNU Guile bindings for
> GObject libraries that provide typelib files. GNU Guile is an
> implementation of Scheme, a Lisp-like language.
Well, in the written-shared/pretty-shared case, Alex Shinn (I just ported his
reference implementation) relies on display/write for everything except lists
and vectors, and those are, from what I can tell, exhaustively checked for
cycles.
trimmed/lazy I have to have a read through in some othe
Mike Gran writes:
> In short, this library hopes to make GTK3 and WebKit2 available to
> Guile.
>
> This particular library is one of several different attempts and
> solving the interface between GTK+3 and Guile. Its differentiating
> (mis)feature is that its bindings are created dynamically at
14 matches
Mail list logo
