Re: make check

2019-03-02 Thread Catonano
Il giorno ven 1 mar 2019 alle ore 11:52 Mike Gran ha scritto: > On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 09:30:46AM +0100, Catonano wrote: > > I added a test to the test-suite/tests/texinfo.serialize.test file, > > > > like this > > > > (assert-serialize '(defcodeindex (% (entry "op"))) > > "@defcod

Re: display-backtrace

2019-03-02 Thread Catonano
Il giorno ven 1 mar 2019 alle ore 12:47 Mike Gran ha scritto: > On Sun, Feb 17, 2019 at 12:07:08PM +0300, Vladimir Zhbanov wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Is there a way to not limit backtrace output with current terminal > > width setting? When I compile my project which uses autotools and > > srfi-64 te

Re: display-backtrace

2019-03-02 Thread Catonano
API reference -> Debugging -> Programmatic error handling Would you mind to let me know if you succeed in making this thing work for you ? Thanks

include-from-path in 2.0.14 broken?

2019-03-02 Thread Matt Wette
Is there a known issue for include-from-path for 2.0.14? I'm testing install scripts and what seems to work with "guild" on 2.2.3 does not with 2.0.14: context:  foo.scm includes the expression (include-from-path "abc/def/bar.scm") On 2.2.3:   guild compile -L . -o abc/def/foo.go abc/def/fo

Re: include-from-path in 2.0.14 broken?

2019-03-02 Thread Matt Wette
On 3/2/19 8:23 AM, Matt Wette wrote: Is there a known issue for include-from-path for 2.0.14? I'm testing install scripts and what seems to work with "guild" on 2.2.3 does not with 2.0.14: context:  foo.scm includes the expression (include-from-path "abc/def/bar.scm") On 2.2.3:   guild com

Re: display-backtrace

2019-03-02 Thread Catonano
Il giorno sab 2 mar 2019 alle ore 17:03 Mike Gran ha scritto: > On Sat, Mar 02, 2019 at 04:23:34PM +0100, Catonano wrote: > > API reference -> Debugging -> Programmatic error handling > > > > Would you mind to let me know if you succeed in making this thing work > for > > you ? > > > > Thanks > >

Re: Wisp error location?

2019-03-02 Thread Arne Babenhauserheide
Hi simon, Did you get to a workaround that works for you? Best wishes, Arne Arne Babenhauserheide writes: > Dear simon, > > Thank you for writing! > > The error-reporting in wisp is currently not at the level of regular > Scheme. For some errors you already get the line numbers, but others > s