On Thu 16 Mar 2017 20:26, Amirouche Boubekki writes:
>> So! My proposal for this new "guildhall" would be:
>>
>> 1. a web service
>>
>
> What would be the cli interface associated with that web service?
> Some thing like the following will do:
>
> $ guildhall register
So I think we could
On Thu 16 Mar 2017 23:01, Mark H Weaver writes:
> If [Guix] starts encouraging a decentralized approach, that would
> result in strong pressure on us to freeze our API, which includes even
> such details as which module each package is exported from. This
> would drastically reduce the freedom G
Hello,
白い熊 skribis:
> I'm trying to build the new GNU Guile 2.2.0 - my build fails
> eventually with:
>
> make[2]: Leaving directory
> '/home/shiroikume/compile/guile-2.2.0/libguile'
> Making all in bootstrap
> make[2]: Entering directory
> '/home/shiroikume/compile/guile-2.2.0/bootstrap'
> BO
Hello!
Andy Wingo skribis:
> Crucially, this "guix pack" is really an SDK for Guile and Fibers.
> Fibers is a library. You can now make an SDK for anything!!! I
> mean, I know, that's a lot of exclamation marks, but check it: you can
> develop locally, say using
>
> /opt/guile-fibers
On Fri 17 Mar 2017 12:30, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>> So! My proposal for this new "guildhall" would be:
>>
>> 1. a web service
>>
>> 2. on which users registers projects
>>
>> 3. a project is a name + a git repository with a /package.scm file
>>
>> 4. the package.sc
On March 17, 2017 11:31:50 AM GMT+01:00, l...@gnu.org wrote:
>
>What architecture and operating system is this on?
x86_64 Ubuntu GNU/Linux 4.4.0-67
--
白い熊＠相撲道
> From: l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
> Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2017 12:30:57 +0100
> Cc: guix-de...@gnu.org, guile-user@gnu.org
>
> > Open questions would be, what about other targets like macOS or Windows
> > or whatever? There I don't know. I suspect that if Guix becomes
> > popular enough, someon
Andy Wingo writes:
> On Thu 16 Mar 2017 23:01, Mark H Weaver writes:
>
>> If [Guix] starts encouraging a decentralized approach, that would
>> result in strong pressure on us to freeze our API, which includes even
>> such details as which module each package is exported from. This
>> would drast
On Fri 17 Mar 2017 14:54, Christopher Allan Webber
writes:
> Andy Wingo writes:
>
>> On Thu 16 Mar 2017 23:01, Mark H Weaver writes:
>>
>>> If [Guix] starts encouraging a decentralized approach, that would
>>> result in strong pressure on us to freeze our API, which includes even
>>> such detai
Hi Andy,
It does look a lot like the channels we propose.
Another thing to keep in mind is that it is possible to relocate guix
binaries into any prefix so you do not actually need root privileges.
It is something I am using for testing packages on HPC without root
and I am going to make binari
Many thanks!
Just did some benchmarks and it looks like there are decent performance
improvements :)
Regards
Jan
# Guile 2.0.11
make[1]: Entering directory '/home/jan/test/aiscm/bench'
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=./.libs:/usr/local/lib GC_INITIAL_HEAP_SIZE=1G
GC_USE_ENTIRE_HEAP=Y /usr/bin/guile bench.sc
Andy Wingo writes:
> On Thu 16 Mar 2017 20:26, Amirouche Boubekki writes:
>
>>> So! My proposal for this new "guildhall" would be:
>>>
>>> 1. a web service
>>>
>>
>> What would be the cli interface associated with that web service?
>> Some thing like the following will do:
>>
>> $ guildh
12 matches
Mail list logo
