I am working on “Compiling to the Virtual Machine”. Guile passes an `env’
object to the parser/compiler which is apparently the module object for the
desired execution environment.
To reference top-level variables in (external) tree-il I am using
'(toplevel foo)
but I guess I should b
Andy Wingo writes:
> Finally for the release we should consider publicity -- what do we do?
> Anything special? Volunteers are welcome here. The NEWS is quite
> verbose, so condensing it into a set of 5-10 big-ticket items could be
> useful; dunno.
One important point would be to send advance
If I may add my two cents as a Scheme layman: the question is not so much about
making Guile more popular, but about making Scheme itself more popular.
One big reason for Python’s popularity is something I haven’t seen mentioned in
this thread so far: if you know pseudocode you basically know Py
David Kastrup writes:
> Nala Ginrut writes:
>
>> I think we have to elaborate the question clearer.
>>
>> 1. How to make guile-scheme more successful?
>> I think this is similar to ask "how to make scheme more successful".
>> This is the big question to the whole scheme community.
>>
>> 2. How
Alejandro Sanchez writes:
> If I may add my two cents as a Scheme layman: the question is not so much
> about making Guile more popular, but about making Scheme itself more popular.
>
> One big reason for Python’s popularity is something I haven’t seen
> mentioned in this thread so far: if you
2017-03-05 0:44 GMT+01:00 Arne Babenhauserheide :
>
> David Kastrup writes:
>
>> Nala Ginrut writes:
>>
>>> I think we have to elaborate the question clearer.
>>>
>>> 1. How to make guile-scheme more successful?
>>> I think this is similar to ask "how to make scheme more successful".
>>> This is
On 03/04/2017 06:41 PM, Alejandro Sanchez wrote:
> If I may add my two cents as a Scheme layman: the question is not so much
> about making Guile more popular, but about making Scheme itself more popular.
>
> One big reason for Python’s popularity is something I haven’t seen mentioned
> in this