Re: [PATCH] Improved ^c support for gdb/guile

2014-02-17 Thread Mark Kettenis
> From: Doug Evans > Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 02:39:25 -0500 > > Hi. > > Here's my modest contribution to the Guile anniversary potluck. > > The patch to selftest-support.exp could be done differently, > I've tried to keep it simple. The problem is that gdb with guile > will get SIGPWR from time

Re: [PATCH] Improved ^c support for gdb/guile

2014-02-17 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Mark Kettenis skribis: > Didn't realize Guile used threads. I guess that's safe if the > interpreter makes sure it never calls into GDB code concurrently. Actually :-), Guile comes with a REPL server, which clients (such as Geiser, an Emacs mode for Scheme) can connect to. But the server runs

Problem with ftw from (ice-9 ftw)

2014-02-17 Thread Frank Terbeck
Hey list, I used to write installation routines for scheme modules in bourne shell, that would ask the guile interpreter for (%site-path) etc. If I call out to guile anyway, I suppose it's more natural to implement the whole thing in scheme. That's what I did, with the help of ‘ftw’ from the (ice

Re: Potluck dish - Simple functional reactive programming

2014-02-17 Thread David Thompson
David Thompson writes: > Lately I've been playing around with functional reactive programming > (FRP) applied to video games. This style of programming allows for a > declarative, functional way of describing time-varying values. Contrast > this method of programming with more traditional hooks