On 11/25/2013 03:09 AM, Doug Evans wrote:
>
> I didn't handle varobj because it's got Python more tightly embedded
> in it, and I think adding it can wait until there's an actual need.
Sounds like this series might be useful for you too then, as
it generalizes dynamic varobjs, decoupling them fro
On 11/28/2013 08:24 PM, Pedro Alves wrote:
Sounds like this series might be useful for you too then, as
it generalizes dynamic varobjs, decoupling them from python:
https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2013-11/msg00739.html
Yeah, patch #1 ~ #4 are about the generalization.
--
Yao (齐尧)
Are `display' and `write' supposed to get overwritten with generic
functions when GOOPS is loaded? The manual says so, but when I try it in
2.0.9 and the latest build on master, it doesn't seem to happen:
scheme@(guile-user)> (use-modules (oop goops))
scheme@(guile-user)> display
$2 = #
scheme@(g
