Re: pretty-print for 1+

2013-09-13 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Brian Killian skribis: > Using guile 2.0.9 and the ice-9 pretty-print module, when I apply: > > (pretty-print '(1+ 1)) > > I get: > > (#{1+}# 1) > > I was expecting: > > (1+ 1) > > Is this an issue with pretty-print or should I adjust my expectation? I think it’s an issue with ‘write’. Specific

Re: and-let* is not composable?

2013-09-13 Thread Panicz Maciej Godek
> Well, while syntax-rules macros are quite easy to understand > > (at least from the user's point of view), although sometimes a little > > tricky, the syntax-case system I find still too difficult to use. > > define-macro, on the other hand, is very easy to explain > > even to beginner programme