Hi all,
Eli Zaretskii recently asked this question as an aside in the thread on
guile 2.09 build on mingw.
"Btw, is there documentation anywhere about how to use the GDB
interface functions in Guile? I sometimes need to display Scheme
values while debugging, and I see there are functions for that
Hello,
m...@markwitmer.com skribis:
> I'm pleased to announce that Guile XCB is, at last, a real thing! I had
> to take a couple months off of working on it, but finally had time
> recently to go back and get it in pretty good shape.
>
> You can find it at https://github.com/mwitmer/guile-xcb.
E
Hi Mark!
Nice tool!
A bit off topic but maybe something that is perhaps useful in this project,
is there any scheme framework
centered around the scheme xsd specification to validate and translate
data.
If not, I could help. I'm wanting to learn that technology
and could in the mean time code so
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to gmane.lisp.guile.user as well.
Stefan Israelsson Tampe writes:
> Hi Mark!
>
> Nice tool!
>
> A bit off topic but maybe something that is perhaps useful in this
> project, is there any scheme framework
> centered arou
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to gmane.lisp.guile.user as well.
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Hello,
>
> m...@markwitmer.com skribis:
>
>> I'm pleased to announce that Guile XCB is, at last, a real thing! I had
>> to take a couple months of
> From: Mark H Weaver
> Cc: l...@gnu.org, guile-user@gnu.org
> Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 11:45:51 -0400
>
> Eli Zaretskii writes:
> > The bug report at http://bugs.gnu.org/14171 says that when Guile is
> > compiled with enable-posix, it "can't start the REPL". Can someone
> > please show me a sim
> Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 20:17:25 +0300
> From: Eli Zaretskii
> Cc: l...@gnu.org, guile-user@gnu.org
>
> Ah, so REPL means "read-eval-print loop". It's a bit bizarre to see
> this acronym used and explained in the Guile reference manual, but
> not indexed, so please consider the trivial 2-line p
Eli Zaretskii skribis:
>> Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 20:17:25 +0300
>> From: Eli Zaretskii
>> Cc: l...@gnu.org, guile-user@gnu.org
>>
>> Ah, so REPL means "read-eval-print loop". It's a bit bizarre to see
>> this acronym used and explained in the Guile reference manual, but
>> not indexed, so plea
Eli Zaretskii skribis:
>> From: l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
>> Cc: m...@netris.org, guile-user@gnu.org
>> Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2013 16:59:19 +0200
>>
>> > Running ports.test
>> > FAIL: ports.test: file: binary mode ignores port encoding
>> > FAIL: ports.test: file: binary mode ig
Hi Julian,
Could you help us understand some code you added to Guile in 2007?
Eli Zaretskii writes:
> Why isn't the signal delivery thread launched at program start
The signal delivery thread is not launched until the first signal
handler is installed. This would seem sensible if not for the f
Hi Ludovic,
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Eli Zaretskii skribis:
>
>> It's due to the CRLF thing. These files are open in the "w" mode, but
>> then read using the "rb" mode. So the CR character is left after the
>> newline is stripped, and botches the comparison. The debug lines yo
> From: l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
> Cc: guile-user@gnu.org
> Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 22:19:13 +0200
>
> > As long as we are on the topic of the Info docs: producing Info
> > manuals with UTF-8 encoded characters is not a good idea for the MinGW
> > build, because the Windows console does not s
> From: l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
> Cc: m...@netris.org, guile-user@gnu.org
> Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 22:45:34 +0200
>
> I think this patch solves the problem:
>
> diff --git a/libguile/rdelim.c b/libguile/rdelim.c
> index 9d14967..9f16c69 100644
> --- a/libguile/rdelim.c
> +++ b/libguile/rd
> From: Mark H Weaver
> Cc: Eli Zaretskii , guile-user@gnu.org
> Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 18:28:13 -0400
>
> I think this is a bad idea for multiple reasons:
>
> * Handling of alternate line endings does not belong here; it belongs in
> a transcoder of some sort.
>
> * This solution partially
14 matches
Mail list logo
