On Sun 10 Jul 2011 07:14, Germán Arias writes:
> With guile 2.0.2, GCC 4.6 and gc 7.1, make check give me the error:
>
> make[5]: `test-pthread-create' is up to date.
> CC test_pthread_create_secondary-test-pthread-create-secondary.o
> In file included from test-pthread-create-secondary.c:3
On Mon 01 Aug 2011 15:02, Panicz Maciej Godek writes:
> (define x (load "2plus3.scm")) ; (i wish x was 5)
I have fixed this to return the result(s) of evaluating the last
expression in the file, or the unspecified value if the file has no
forms. Previously there was differing behavior: primitiv
Hi Johan,
On Fri 05 Aug 2011 17:16, Johan Hidding writes:
> Hi, In manual chapter 5.3.1 there is a small example program. Using
> GCC 4.6, this only compiles with -fpermissive, unless an explicit
> reinterpret_cast (which is an alias for (void *)) is
> used. Should this be considered a (minor) b
On Mon 22 Aug 2011 22:59, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> (cond-expand (guile-2 'alright)
> (guile (debug-enable 'debug)))
Or:
(cond-expand
((not guile-2) (debug-enable 'debug)))
Regards,
Andy
--
http://wingolog.org/
On Wed 10 Aug 2011 11:30, Thien-Thi Nguyen writes:
> Mixp is a Guile interface to expat, James Clark's XML Parser,
> originally written by Thierry Bézecourt. This release of Mixp is
> available under the terms of the GNU GPL v3 (or later); see COPYING.
> It has been tested with Guile 1.4
On Mon 15 Aug 2011 12:00, Thien-Thi Nguyen writes:
> Guile-GDBM is a Guile module that provides Scheme bindings to the
> GNU dbm library. It was originally written by Martin Grabmüller
> and is now released under the GNU General Public License (GPL)
> version 3.
Nice!
I get the same co
On Tue 23 Aug 2011 01:17, Panicz Maciej Godek writes:
> (array-set! a (* (array-ref a i j) 2) i j))
> seems to be unnecessarily prolix, for in C, language designed
> specifically to access arrays,
> the same operation could be written as
> a[i][j] *= 2;
With the appropriate macrology, it could l
Hi Andrew,
Sorry for the late reply.
On Fri 02 Sep 2011 16:29, Andrew Gaylard writes:
> (gdb) bt
> #0 0xfd7ffe89c257 in __lwp_park () from /lib/64/libc.so.1
> #1 0xfd7ffe8941f6 in mutex_lock_queue () from /lib/64/libc.so.1
> #2 0xfd7ffe894ca8 in mutex_lock_impl () from /lib/64/li
Hi Panicz,
On Mon 05 Sep 2011 23:35, Panicz Maciej Godek writes:
> The thing is that is implemented as a smob,
> and that there is no easy way to add a superclass
> to a class created from smob.
Ew. Why don't we instead allocate a typecode for arrays. I just pushed
a patch to do that, and fo
On Sun 25 Sep 2011 05:54, Mike Gran writes:
> What is the replacement for gh_repl?
I don't know! When I started with Guile in 2003 I think the GH API was
already deprecated :)
> Which is to say, if I'm using Guile as an extension language, what
> command should I execute in C to drop me into t
On Mon 26 Sep 2011 13:50, ri...@happyleptic.org writes:
> Just to report that from this page:
>
> http://www.gnu.org/software/guile/manual/html_node/Locales.html#Locales
>
> Then the "Locales and Internatioanlization" link leads to a 404 error
> (looking for:
> http://www.gnu.org/software/guile/ma
> From: Andy Wingo
> To: Mike Gran
> Cc: Guile User
> Sent: Monday, January 9, 2012 9:35 AM
> Subject: Re: gh_repl
>
> On Sun 25 Sep 2011 05:54, Mike Gran writes:
>
>> What is the replacement for gh_repl?
>
> I don't know! When I started with Guile in 2003 I think the GH API was
> already
On Mon 09 Jan 2012 19:11, Mike Gran writes:
>> scm_call_1 (scm_public_ref ("ice-9 top-repl", "top-repl")) ?
>>
>> Do we need a better answer here? :)
>
> For guile-2.0, I eventually settled on
>
> scm_call_1 (scm_c_public_ref ("system repl repl", "start-repl"),
> scm_from_locale_symbol ("s
Hi,
On Tue 01 Nov 2011 16:34, Julian Graham writes:
> I was playing around with some C code that uses the new R6RS
> bytevector ports, and I noticed that there doesn't seem to be an easy
> way (a la `let-values' or `receive') to access multiple return values
> from C. I've resorted to doing:
>
On Thu 03 Nov 2011 14:37, 42t...@gmail.com writes:
> I seek advice on making the Guile manual and docstrings clearer and more
> consistent, two qualities that I think novices especially appreciate.
We are still very much interested in your contributions, especially now
that the assignment forms a
> From: Andy Wingo
>> For guile-2.0, I eventually settled on
>>
>> scm_call_1 (scm_c_public_ref ("system repl repl",
> "start-repl"),
>> scm_from_locale_symbol ("scheme"));
>
> This won't catch SIGINT, and it won't add on the session, regex, and
> threads bindings to your guile-user.
On Sun 06 Nov 2011 12:18, Ian Price writes:
> I have a patch to deal with this, but I have not received any
> feedback on my proposed functions, so I haven't posted it
> yet. Basically, I wanted to add 4 functions, including a
> read-chunked-response-body, and to have the (web client) handle
> ch
Hey Andy,
> Not yet. You interested in adding scm_c_value_ref (SCM, size_t) to the
> API, and documentation to api-control.texi? If you do it soon, it
> will make it into 2.0.4.
Sure. Gimme a day or so and I'll have something for review.
Regards,
Julian
Mike Gran writes:
> scm_from_locale_symbol ("scheme"));
Note that it's good practice to always use `scm_from_utf8_symbol' or
`scm_from_latin1_symbol' when the argument is a C string literal. The
choice of which (`utf8' or `latin1') depends on the encoding of your C
source file. Similarly, fo
On Mon 09 Jan 2012 20:16, Mike Gran writes:
>> From: Andy Wingo
> >> For guile-2.0, I eventually settled on
>>>
>>> scm_call_1 (scm_c_public_ref ("system repl repl",
>> "start-repl"),
>>> scm_from_locale_symbol ("scheme"));
>>
>> This won't catch SIGINT, and it won't add on the sess
> From: Mark H Weaver
>> scm_from_locale_symbol ("scheme"));
>
> Note that it's good practice to always use `scm_from_utf8_symbol' or
> `scm_from_latin1_symbol' when the argument is a C string literal.
[... ]
> More importantly, since many people tend to copy code snippets from what
> the
On Mon 07 Nov 2011 01:19, cong gu writes:
> When guile 2.0 is used to write scripts, one have to manually do a
> setlocale at the beginning of the script to enable non-asciiI
> character support (why not by default?).
For the record, this will be fixed in the upcoming 2.0.4.
Thanks for the repo
On Thu 17 Nov 2011 06:29, ri...@happyleptic.org writes:
> -[ Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 11:43:52AM -0800, Mike Gran ]
>> I believe that you can still run the whole test suite on the C evaluator
>> by erasing all the .go files from the modules lib, setting auto compile off,
>> then running the check-
Hi,
On Thu 17 Nov 2011 20:43, anoglad writes:
> Is there a convenient way to run the gtk-main loop and the guile repl at
> the same time? I'd like to be able to create widgets interactively.
There are three options.
* Run a special console REPL that integrates with the main loop. See
gl
Hi Daniel,
Thanks very much for the thorough analysis!
On Tue 27 Dec 2011 16:49, Daniel Hartwig writes:
> Given those points, I have attached a patch implementing the suggested
> handling for "Expires" and will take a look at perhaps relaxing
> parse-date (and others). Anyone have ideas on tha
Hi Sven,
On Fri 02 Dec 2011 09:06, Sven Hartrumpf writes:
> After a long period of working with other Schemes,
> I am returning to guile for some tests to see what
> Guile has achieved in recent years.
Cool! Let us know if you find something that smells bad.
> My test program is made up of ar
On Tue 20 Dec 2011 06:29, zx spectrumgomas writes:
> The problem was my value of the LC_NUMERIC locale. If locale is
> spanish , decimal separator is "," and all doubles are displayed with
> a comma instead of a dot. I fixed it with :
> $export LC_NUMERIC="C"
Very interesting bug report, thanks
27 matches
Mail list logo
