On 28 Apr 2011, at 11:41, Andy Wingo wrote:
> Guile has a tutorial written by Daniel Kraft, which uses Scheme to
> extend a C drawing process. It uses Gnuplot for the drawing, which is
> not GNU, and AFAIK not even free software. It would be better to use
> some other drawing library; for exampl
() Paul Smith
() Mon, 19 Sep 2011 11:14:34 -0400
In make, everything is just words: broken up on whitespace. So for
example, maybe someone writes a Guile function that computes a complex
set of prerequisites for a target:
target: $(guile (...some Guile program...))
Even bef
On Tue, 2011-09-20 at 18:17 +0200, Thien-Thi Nguyen wrote:
> () Paul Smith
> () Mon, 19 Sep 2011 11:14:34 -0400
>
>In make, everything is just words: broken up on whitespace. So for
>example, maybe someone writes a Guile function that computes a complex
>set of prerequisites for a ta
On Tue, 2011-09-20 at 13:31 -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
> > In Scheme, w/ SRFI 13, you could express this as:
> >
> > This is not so tricky, i think.
>
> Heh, cute!
Thinking about this more it occurs to me that I will likely need a
module defined for any GNU make specific procedures I write to avo
2011/9/20 Tobias Gerdin :
> Lastly, just thought I'd mention an issue that I ran into when
> building Guile-Cairo (commit 1918626 from Git, looks like it
> corresponds to 1.9.91). When I run autogen/configure it complains that
> I need to supply a prefix argument because "the default prefix,
> /us
() Paul Smith
() Tue, 20 Sep 2011 13:31:28 -0400
I showed the code in my original post, but the way I've implemented it
is that the argument to the make "guile" function (that is, everything
after the "$(guile " to the closing paren--it's handy that Guile parens
will virtually always
() Paul Smith
() Tue, 20 Sep 2011 15:02:09 -0400
I was thinking something like "gnu make" would be OK, but maybe there
are already conventions for applications/application-specific module
hierarchies that I should be following?
None that i am aware of. If the module is completely inter
Hi Paul,
Thanks for working on this! :)
Paul Smith writes:
> So far, I have these translations (see the C code I posted earlier):
>
> t => "t" (for make conditionals, non-empty is true)
> nil => "" (for make conditionals, empty is false)
Note that in modern Scheme, t and
