Re: Now that SCM type is a union...

2011-08-14 Thread Andy Wingo
Hi Ken, On Sun 14 Aug 2011 00:00, Ken Raeburn writes: > * We should expect some Guile applications to be in C++. What > versions of the C++ spec should Guile support? Dunno. What do other languages have to do with Guile's C interface? Specifically what does C++ have to do with this? (Serio

Re: Now that SCM type is a union...

2011-08-14 Thread Ken Raeburn
On Aug 14, 2011, at 16:10, Andy Wingo wrote: >> * We should expect some Guile applications to be in C++. What >> versions of the C++ spec should Guile support? > > Dunno. What do other languages have to do with Guile's C interface? > Specifically what does C++ have to do with this? (Serious que

Re: Now that SCM type is a union...

2011-08-14 Thread Ken Raeburn
On Aug 14, 2011, at 22:04, Ken Raeburn wrote: >>> * Shouldn't there be testing to catch this? (C89 mode, C99 mode, >>> different C++ specs, enabling various compiler warnings -- for >>> whatever compiler is in use -- and make them fatal, any interesting >>> ways one might want to use libguile in a