On Wed 09 Mar 2011 01:05, Germán Arias writes:
> This is gNewSense Deltah, with the latest updates. The architecture is
> i686 (an old Pentium III).
What GCC version?
Andy
--
http://wingolog.org/
On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 08:20:29PM +1300, Aidan Gauland wrote:
> (parse-c-struct event-pointer
> (list uint8 uint8 uint8
> (list uint8 int int uint16 )))
>
It seemed to be an off-by-one(-byte) error. There was padding to
align (to 32-bits, I think) the sub-st
nalaginrut writes:
> hi all!
> I got a question. Is there any approach to define a "private"
> vars/methods in the GOOPS? Or it's impossible? I didn't find any
> "private" info in the GOOPS manual.
Hi there!
In Guile, the visibility of identifiers - including any functions you've
defined to get
Germán,
Please send us the output of the following commands:
gcc --version
gcc -dumpmachine
cat /proc/cpuinfo
free -m
And finally, again from the libguile directory, please run the following
command and send us the output. It is slightly different than the last
one you tried.
gcc -std=
> If you can determine at runtime whether or not any given slot access is
> allowed - perhaps based on (current-module) - it should be possible to
> enforce this by defining a new kind of slot #:allocation and putting
> that runtime check in the #:slot-ref function.
>
> Regards,
> Neil
Th
> > If you can determine at runtime whether or not any given slot access is
> > allowed - perhaps based on (current-module) - it should be possible to
> > enforce this by defining a new kind of slot #:allocation and putting
> > that runtime check in the #:slot-ref function.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
There is another approach (probably overkill) to storing private
attributes of GOOPS objects, or any other Scheme object for that matter:
Weak-key hash tables, documented in section 6.18.3.1 of the manual.
A nice high-level interface for using them is `make-object-property'.
However, it should be
Hello,
Trying tekuti for the very frst time [never used/hold any blog, please excuse my
total lack of knowledge about this]
I took a git clone and slightly modified config.scm and mod-lisp.scm for using
the
port 8085 [8080 already used by guile-www intranet ...], then performed the
required
Output for gcc --version:
german@german-desktop:~$ gcc --version
gcc (GCC) 4.2.4 (Ubuntu 4.2.4-1ubuntu3)
Copyright (C) 2007 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is
NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR
P
Germán Arias writes:
> Output for gcc --version:
>
> german@german-desktop:~$ gcc --version
> gcc (GCC) 4.2.4 (Ubuntu 4.2.4-1ubuntu3)
> Copyright (C) 2007 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is
> NO
> warranty; not even for MERCHAN
On Wed 09 Mar 2011 10:37, nalaginrut writes:
> But I still want to talk this topic: "How to hide the critical
> property?"
I don't know what the GOOPS / CLOS answer is to this, but more
generally, you might enjoy the following paper:
http://mumble.net/~jar/pubs/secureos/
Regards,
Andy
--
Hi
Just because I hit it today i am reporting this, but with low priority. I got
into
this small problem [a very small and ridiculous example for the sake of
'demonstration']: the doc says [6.17.7]
The coding declaration must appear in a scheme comment. It can either
be a
semico
OK, I solved the problem. Checking the files vm.c, vm.s,... . I found
the character
at file vm.c. I remember some time ago I had a compilation problem
caused by this character in a file. However, this character not always
cause problems. I removed all occurrences of this character in vm.c, and
I have a program written entirely in guile's scheme and I use
autotools to distribute it.
Is there a guide to distribute guile programs?
I know that some languages have, but I can see any in the guile docs.
My biggest concern is about the .scm files that makes up my program.
For those who know
14 matches
Mail list logo
