On 1 Dec 2010, at 22:34, Keith Wright wrote:
One can set the constants to functions that evaluate
to themselves. One use would be expressions like
(1 + f)(x). The () just shows up in the context above.
I didn't really follow that, but in seems that
you want to be able to apply a list of funct
On 2 Dec 2010, at 17:06, Hans Aberg wrote:
Another problem: passing a list of length two to a function that
takes two non-arguments. For example,
(define h (lambda (x y) (display x) (display y)))
and passing (list 1 2) to it.
It is in the same context as before: I want to build functions lik
Nala Ginrut writes:
> yeah~you hit it precisely!
> But I'm not sure if I modified the slot-seting call
I'm not clear what you mean by that.
> ,the result is all
> slot-set! procedure would be effected?
No, that's not the case for either of my suggestions.
If you invented something like `#:all
Andy Wingo writes:
> But I would like to mention the downside of the dynamic FFI
> approach: with the static FFI you get typechecking by the C
> compiler, but with the dynamic FFI you're on your own.
Interesting point, thanks.
> I suppose you could also use the C compiler to at least check that
Thien-Thi Nguyen writes:
> Thanks; i appreciate the feedback. I have the impression after a
> quick skim that all the changes are bugfixes (not merely enhancements).
> Is that correct?
Yes, I would say so.
> In any case, i will gladly apply them once i figure out
> their nature and suitable Ch
() Neil Jerram
() Fri, 03 Dec 2010 18:24:50 +
Yes, I would say so.
OK, thanks for the confirmation.
I'm happy to explain more if they're not immediately obvious...
No worries. I'll figure it out...
