On Sat 27 Nov 2010 07:20, Linas Vepstas writes:
> I'd like to horn in on Andy's glory by advertising guile-dbi
>
>http://home.gna.org/guile-dbi/
Hey cool! Didn't know about that one. Well, I had heard, but I forgot.
Cheers,
Andy
--
http://wingolog.org/
Hi,
On Sun 28 Nov 2010 12:51, Neil Jerram writes:
> I like the backend-independence of the DBI interface, and I also like
> Scheme code that I can just drop in and use without needing to compile
> any C.
Yes to both! And a good suggestion you had later.
But I would like to mention the downside
On Sun 28 Nov 2010 17:08, Linas Vepstas writes:
> is there an obvious URL documenting the new FFI technology?
Build the manual from git, and check out the section entitled "Foreign
Function Interface".
Andy
--
http://wingolog.org/
On Sat 27 Nov 2010 18:42, Ian Hulin writes:
> Our long-term aim, when we are able to move to using Guile V2.0 as an
> infrastructure, is to byte-compile as many of these as possible during
> the Lily build using something like.
> $ guile-tool compile
>--output-file=<.go file>
Ralf has promi
