Hi,
On Tue 08 Jun 2010 23:37, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> So, ‘file-encoding’ could be taught more encoding names than
> ‘set-port-encoding!’ (and it could be written in Scheme, too.)
I'm OK with whatever we come up with, but I think we will need a
`file-encoding' in C for boot reas
On Tue 08 Jun 2010 16:16, Mike Gran writes:
>> Andy sez
>>> Mike sez
>
>>> We talked about making a list of aliases between
>
>>> Emacs coding names and standard encoding names
>>> at one point.
>
>> Ah, thanks for the links. What do you think is the best
>> thing to do in this case?
>
> I'd sa
Does guile (1.8.x, or any version) have the integer logical shift
operators, like C's << and >> ?
While searching for those, I realized that what I was trying to do was
represent small sets of booleans as the bits of an integer... and that
somthing similar could be done in a more scheme-li
Hi Steve,
On Wed 09 Jun 2010 06:04, steve tell writes:
> Does guile (1.8.x, or any version) have the integer logical shift
> operators, like C's << and >> ?
We have ash (arithmetic shift) but not lsh (logical shift). I admit I am
somewhat ignorant regarding when you would prefer lsh over ash. I
Andy Wingo wrote:
> Hi Steve,
>
> On Wed 09 Jun 2010 06:04, steve tell writes:
>
> > Does guile (1.8.x, or any version) have the integer logical shift
> > operators, like C's << and >> ?
>
> We have ash (arithmetic shift) but not lsh (logical shift). I admit I am
> somewhat ignorant reg
