I don't understand what xxx is. Can you help? (Bit of a noob question,
I feel).
SCM rest = SCM_EOL;
SCM arg_list = SCM_EOL;
arg_list = scm_cons(SCM_MAKINUM(4), arg_list);
arg_list = scm_cons(SCM_MAKINUM(1), arg_list);
SCM func = xxx("-");
SCM v = scm_apply_1(func, arg_list, rest
Hello one more time,
There was a little problem in mytest.c, where I had declared a pointer
only and no address location. This was the cause of the segmentation
fault.
With the following source files, the code Linas posted, after some
modifications, is compiled to a binary `vepstas' which runs fi
Paul Emsley wrote:
I don't understand what xxx is. Can you help? (Bit of a noob question,
I feel).
SCM rest = SCM_EOL;
SCM arg_list = SCM_EOL;
arg_list = scm_cons(SCM_MAKINUM(4), arg_list);
arg_list = scm_cons(SCM_MAKINUM(1), arg_list);
SCM func = xxx("-");
SCM v = scm_appl
Hi Paul,
Here is what you should use for xxx:
SCM FindFunc(const char *funcName)
{
SCM funcSymbol = scm_c_lookup(funcName);
if (!funcSymbol)
// undefined symbol
return 0;
return scm_variable_ref(funcSymbol);
}
Regards,
Thomas
On Feb 17, 2010, at 7:25 PM, Paul Emsley wrote
Thomas Thiriez wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> Here is what you should use for xxx:
>
> SCM FindFunc(const char *funcName)
> {
>SCM funcSymbol = scm_c_lookup(funcName);
>
>if (!funcSymbol)
> // undefined symbol
> return 0;
>
>return scm_variable_ref(funcSymbol);
> }
Oi!
Hi,
On Wed 17 Feb 2010 20:03, Thomas Thiriez writes:
> Here is what you should use for xxx:
Hm, not quite :)
> SCM FindFunc(const char *funcName)
> {
>SCM funcSymbol = scm_c_lookup(funcName);
scm_c_lookup gives you a variable object, as you note below; better to
call it `funcVar' (or `fun
On Wed 17 Feb 2010 19:26, "Tomas By" writes:
> I think the "file not found" message is just the general dynamic-link-
> anything error.
Yes, it is a libltdl bug. See
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool/2009-12/msg00057.html
More than that, it's tough to say; I'm mercury-ignorant.
A
--
h
On Wed, February 17, 2010 21:12, Andy Wingo wrote:
> On Wed 17 Feb 2010 19:26, "Tomas By" writes:
> More than that, it's tough to say; I'm mercury-ignorant.
Well, since the `vepstas' binary works, the Mercury bit seems ok.
Do you have any suggestions for how to debug it?
Is there anything I can
() "Tomas By"
() Wed, 17 Feb 2010 21:21:43 +0100
ldd doesn't seem to report anything wrong, but is there any
other test available from the shell?
If you have strace(1), you can use the script (i call it ~/bin/st):
#!/bin/sh
exec strace -f -e open "$@" 2>&1 | grep -v o.such.file
to find
